by Q. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:31 am
by southee » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:50 am
by fish » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:23 am
by Bully » Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:46 pm
Quichey wrote:If individuals gave a **** about their ecological footprint they could save $16 a week by being more energy conscious.
by Bully » Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:49 pm
SJABC wrote:Quichey wrote:Get up at 4AM and walk the 20km to work...
I need my car for work, and besides my fuel for my job is paid for by my company, so next suggestion ?
by Psyber » Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:36 pm
by redandblack » Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:03 pm
by Psyber » Sat Apr 23, 2011 3:36 pm
by redandblack » Sat Apr 23, 2011 5:17 pm
by whufc » Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:22 pm
Psyber wrote:What is wrong with option 3 - announcing a fully thought through plan, and still offering to take submissions on the whole package, and consider them?
That approach would enable full consultation, and not leave room for speculation about whether they have no idea or what they have to hide.
by redandblack » Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:12 am
by redandblack » Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:27 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |