SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

LMA · Post by **LMA** » Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:55 pm

If they pull out prior to the season and give enough time to redraw you'll have no byes at all, but you'll probably end up playing a couple of teams 4 times

catchisthecry · Post by **catchisthecry** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:22 am

Is there some chance Wingfield Royals could pull out?
Have they had a team in C grades recently?

finn · Post by **finn** » Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:17 am

wingfield played c2 last year but did have some forfeits.

catchisthecry · Post by **catchisthecry** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:27 am

Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury

At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!

Pag · Post by **Pag** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:38 am

catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury

At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!

They didn't win the flag...

dee man · Post by **dee man** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:02 am

any news on wingfield yet

rubbers0ul · Post by **rubbers0ul** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:54 pm

I think you'll find this C4 Adelaide Uni team is actually the Scum who finished middle of the table in C6 last year

TEX07 · Post by **TEX07** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:12 pm

Pag wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury

At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!
They didn't win the flag...

No they didnt, and they dropped more than one game, we beat them twice and they beat us twice during the year. If it is the same side they might do well though, they have been around the mark for the last three years, with only us and PAC causing them any grief, maybe its thier turn. From last year I would say that if Fitzroy and Salisbury keep on the way they were they are the two sides that may stand in thier way.

rubbers0ul · Post by **rubbers0ul** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:37 pm

TEX07 wrote:
Pag wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury

At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!
They didn't win the flag...

No they didnt, and they dropped more than one game, we beat them twice and they beat us twice during the year. If it is the same side they might do well though, they have been around the mark for the last three years, with only us and PAC causing them any grief, maybe its thier turn. From last year I would say that if Fitzroy and Salisbury keep on the way they were they are the two sides that may stand in thier way.

As i just mentioned this team you are referring to are now in the C2 comp. The Adelaide Uni team here is actually the lowest rank Uni team which was in the C6 comp last year finishing 5th for memory

Punk Rooster · Post by **Punk Rooster** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:00 pm

catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury

At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!

Poll updated to reflect this

finn · Post by **finn** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:52 am

are winfield royals the 4, 8 or 16 mg cigarettes?

catchisthecry · Post by **catchisthecry** » Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:03 pm

Heard from someone wingfield have officially pulled out. Can anyone confirm?
Would an 8 team comp mean 4 byes each?

beef · Post by **beef** » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:57 am

catchisthecry wrote:Heard from someone wingfield have officially pulled out. Can anyone confirm?
Would an 8 team comp mean 4 byes each?

Hopefully 8 teams with no byes would be the smart thing, may upset some triple headers though

finn · Post by **finn** » Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:05 am

beef wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:Heard from someone wingfield have officially pulled out. Can anyone confirm?
Would an 8 team comp mean 4 byes each?

Hopefully 8 teams with no byes would be the smart thing, may upset some triple headers though

according to the amateur league eight team competitions are too hard to program because of oval clashes with higher grades...

Roaring Lion! · Post by **Roaring Lion!** » Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:19 am

finn wrote:
beef wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:Heard from someone wingfield have officially pulled out. Can anyone confirm?
Would an 8 team comp mean 4 byes each?

Hopefully 8 teams with no byes would be the smart thing, may upset some triple headers though

according to the amateur league eight team competitions are too hard to program because of oval clashes with higher grades...

Great!!! sounds like another year of only a 14 game season with 4 x byes which worked sooo well last year :roll:

Hopefully the SAAFL pull their finger out & find a solution as no one want to see a repeat of last years draw in C4 :evil:

TEX07 · Post by **TEX07** » Fri Mar 18, 2011 11:43 am

8 team comp with 4 byes sucked the big one last year! surely they can get each grade to agree that when they have a bye they will play the other team with the bye at that point, if it means that you play certain sides more than others then so be it, some sides will get a better draw than others. This should not change the double headers for sides so that keeps them happy.

Roaring Lion! · Post by **Roaring Lion!** » Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm

TEX07 wrote:8 team comp with 4 byes sucked the big one last year! surely they can get each grade to agree that when they have a bye they will play the other team with the bye at that point, if it means that you play certain sides more than others then so be it, some sides will get a better draw than others. This should not change the double headers for sides so that keeps them happy.

We tried to get that going last year but unfortunatlety other clubs were not interested so the league knocked it back at the time & even asked your club to play a non-points game mid way through the year around the long weekend as we both had a bye (2weeks off each) around it but the powers to be couldnt make it work.

Hopefully we dont get the same senario as last years draw with a stop start season mate. :roll:

TEX07 · Post by **TEX07** » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:26 pm

Roaring Lion! wrote:
TEX07 wrote:8 team comp with 4 byes sucked the big one last year! surely they can get each grade to agree that when they have a bye they will play the other team with the bye at that point, if it means that you play certain sides more than others then so be it, some sides will get a better draw than others. This should not change the double headers for sides so that keeps them happy.

We tried to get that going last year but unfortunatlety other clubs were not interested so the league knocked it back at the time & even asked your club to play a non-points game mid way through the year around the long weekend as we both had a bye (2weeks off each) around it but the powers to be couldnt make it work.

Hopefully we dont get the same senario as last years draw with a stop start season mate.

Agreed will be an ordinary div again if it is the case! Im pulling back this year and playing in the D grade, few more players my age there! We have a 9 side comp in C6 and having 2 byes in the year is great in that comp, our C grade are in C3 and have no byes, much better suited tio ours as we will have a young C grade side this year again.

Good luck with the season, if your late form from last year is anything to go by I would say you should be up there this year, you getting good numbers out?

Roaring Lion! · Post by **Roaring Lion!** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:21 pm

Yeah Tex numbers are on the improve as think we have had about 85 train all up over the Pre-Season & with cricket finishing should gain another 6-12 so numbers should be fine for 3 sides just hope we can keep everyone interested in C Grade as we have the Bye in Rd 1. Wingfiled or Bye in Rd 2. Unley Rd 3. then break for Easter so that will be 1 game in the first 4 weeks if Wingfield pull out & the league leaving the draw...

BenchedEagle · Post by **BenchedEagle** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:40 pm

Can anyone confirm this about Wingfield?
League still has them in the draw so it can't be official

SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Grand Finalists for 2011

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Re: SAAFL Div C4 (2011)

Who is online