wristwatcher wrote:As for a Macho Man cameo......OOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHH YYYYYYYYYYEEEEAAAAAHHHHH......DIG IT!!!!
Don't see it happening. His recent work with the WWE video-game was not done with WWE but with the video-game company. The bad blood between Savage and WWE means we may never see a return.
He also did some work with there toy company who is bringing back his action figure into production, also the wwe has to say yes to both the video game company and the toy company to use him. Also Vince has bad blood with everyone (well nearly) over the years and alot of them have come back into the fold for a short time and Vince has stated plenty of times, he will do things if they are good for business. It would be nice to see a Macho camo at the rumble but I wont suprised if it dont happen also I can see them putting him into the H.O.F. just to annoy Hulk Hogan. Just a point if raven did that and Vince took him back then Vince can take back Macho Man.
That's right, it was the toy company not a video-game company. Due to the fact that Savage had nothing to do with his DVD, and has not even been considered for the HOF, I don't think we'll ever see him return. I haven't heard about the Raven incident (maybe Steph was older then).
Actually it was both
The problem with Barcelona is that I like fish and chips but they had to turn it into calamari and patatas
Media Park wrote:In completely unrelated news, Kevin Nash was spotted flying into Boston with freshly dyed hair...
Unfortunately the news in Kevin Nash has agreed to be part of the Royal Rumble. During January 2011, talks between Nash and TNA over a proposed return to the company broke down and on January 29 it was confirmed that he would had agreed a deal with WWE to appear in the 2011 Royal Rumble
Media Park wrote:In completely unrelated news, Kevin Nash was spotted flying into Boston with freshly dyed hair...
Unfortunately the news in Kevin Nash has agreed to be part of the Royal Rumble. During January 2011, talks between Nash and TNA over a proposed return to the company broke down and on January 29 it was confirmed that he would had agreed a deal with WWE to appear in the 2011 Royal Rumble
Mic wrote:This will make TNA even more keen to re-sign him.
Unfortunately for the fans of TNA you are correct there Mic. The Fact that TNA throws good money at wrestlers past their prime and willing to hold on to the spot light is pissing me off. TNA should be called Total Nostalgia Action.
Mic wrote:This will make TNA even more keen to re-sign him.
Unfortunately for the fans of TNA you are correct there Mic. The Fact that TNA throws good money at wrestlers past their prime and willing to hold on to the spot light is pissing me off. TNA should be called Total Nostalgia Action.
Totally Non-stop Annoying (and WWE is We Won't Entertain).
Mic wrote:This will make TNA even more keen to re-sign him.
Unfortunately for the fans of TNA you are correct there Mic. The Fact that TNA throws good money at wrestlers past their prime and willing to hold on to the spot light is pissing me off. TNA should be called Total Nostalgia Action.
Totally Non-stop Annoying (and WWE is We Won't Entertain).
The only issue I have is if we have potentially four surprise "headliners" go into the rumble, plus Cena, then we're going to have a situation where up to four are going to be there for no reason...
You don't exactly "bring back" a Kevin Nash only for a five minute stint and "seeya later" but if the other news is to be believed, it would likely pan out that way...
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
I just squizzed the footage off the TNA website, and you'd say for now you've got Angle (leader), Steiner, Matt Morgan, Crimson (who?), and you'd assume Sting...
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
