Rik E Boy wrote:X Runna wrote:I don't think there were too many candidates left. No disrespect to Scott, but who else was available who hadn't been categorically rejected already?
Sanderson and Hinkley just to name two.
Are you suggesting that we selected Scott because no one else was available?
regards,
REB
Yes and no..........the Cats obviously know plenty about both Sanderson & Hinkley and had ample time and opportunity to see whether they were up to it. Apparently, they weren't, or one of them would have landed the job.
The other available experienced coaches, Laidley & Williams - neither the right fit there. So then they would have looked at assistant coaches, a bit like a tornado and once it had all settled down........what respected assistant coaches who had been interviewed for senior jobs, missed out and then
stayed at their current club were there aside from Scott & Sanderson? Lots of brand new contracts with the assistant coaches, and this early into them, would be very hard to break.
Apparently Scott came close to getting the Port job (far more well considered than Sanderson), so he must be well regarded by other clubs too now & then one last spot came up - bingo. Nobody else of note who would fit the bill was available....
So, not saying there was nobody else, but I am saying everybody else (barring Sanderson & Hinkley) had been interviewed for every other job going, and missed out on them, so maybe none of them were up to it. The shortlisting process had been done for the Cats by the other clubs and by the assistant coach merry-go-round. I'm sure the process would have been a lot longer and probably with a different result if Bomber had made his intentions clear a few weeks earlier.
See where I'm coming from now REB?