trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Post by **GWW** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:21 am

Sounds like a massive Rucci beat-up to me.

Gingernuts · Post by **Gingernuts** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:22 am

Pidge wrote:
G wrote:Cant believe so many people are giving Tambling a rap as he is an over-rated DUD
Thats 2 trades in the past 12 months that are NO GOOD [Schmidt and now Tambling] and Adelaide wonder why they are struggling when BUMS like this will play fairly regularly

As for Gold Coast playing finals in 2011, please leave it alone or you'll go blind !!!!

Schmidt is good...

He also wasn't even traded. He was delisted by Brisbane and picked up by Adelaide in the pre-season draft.

Get back under your rock G. :roll:

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:24 am

the big bang wrote:
Booney wrote:
The Riddler wrote:
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?

Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.

There's your answer right there

Yep, there are heaps of Father-Son combos with 5 Magarey's between them...

and BRAD contributed how many........?

He was illuding to the Ebert part of the name, not the Brad / Brett part....

Post by **GWW** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:26 am

I think Schmidt was a rookie selection by the Crows.

the big bang · Post by **the big bang** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:30 am

sorry mate.

i see jarred brennan and josh fraser are now with the suns.

Media Park · Post by **Media Park** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:32 am

Media Park wrote:
sound4 wrote:Brennan and Fraser both going to the Suns.

Josh Fraser is not even a has-been... He's a never-was.

the big bang wrote:sorry mate.

i see jarred brennan and josh fraser are now with the suns.

Yup. And Brennan now becomes their best after Ablett player.

whufc · Post by **whufc** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:38 am

Media Park wrote:
Media Park wrote:
sound4 wrote:Brennan and Fraser both going to the Suns.

Josh Fraser is not even a has-been... He's a never-was.

the big bang wrote:sorry mate.

i see jarred brennan and josh fraser are now with the suns.

Yup. And Brennan now becomes their best after Ablett player.

At this stage

Drop Bear · Post by **Drop Bear** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:48 am

whufc wrote:
Media Park wrote:
Media Park wrote:
sound4 wrote:Brennan and Fraser both going to the Suns.

Josh Fraser is not even a has-been... He's a never-was.

the big bang wrote:sorry mate.

i see jarred brennan and josh fraser are now with the suns.

Yup. And Brennan now becomes their best after Ablett player.

At this stage

Brennan is far too inconsistant, I rate Rischetelli above Brennan easily.

Bum Crack · Post by **Bum Crack** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:01 am

Exactly and everyone can now see why AFC chose Dangerfield. Ebert will play 150-200 AFL games but wont be a game breaker or topline midfielder[/quote]
Neither is Dangerfield at this stage[/quote]
Exactly.[/quote]

please tell me where i said 'Dangerfield is a topline midfielder' there is no doubt he has the potential to be but he has been a game breaker and won a few games already for us with a few bags up forward[/quote]
He's also lost a few for you as well.

cossi11 · Post by **cossi11** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:05 am

Houli Quits Essendon and demands a trade a Richmond.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Strawb · Post by **Strawb** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:10 am

cossi11 wrote:Houli Quits Essendon and demands a trade a Richmond.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

he will ask for a one year deal and go to GWS

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:10 am

Mr Beefy wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?

Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.

Exactly and everyone can now see why AFC chose Dangerfield. Ebert will play 150-200 AFL games but wont be a game breaker or topline midfielder

Neither is Dangerfield at this stage

Only thing he will break is himself. Admirable? Perhaps. Perfect for the team? No way.

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:10 am

Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?

Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.

Good call Booney, Ebert turns it over something shocking. However, it might be of some comfort to know that many of his Eagle team mates *insert Cletus accent* 'share a common infirmity'. So this means perhaps this is something that Port can work on and he might prove to be valuable after all.

regards,

REB

The Riddler · Post by **The Riddler** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:18 am

the big bang wrote:sorry mate.

i see jarred brennan and josh fraser are now with the suns.

According to Caro Wilson there was nearly a dust up between Guy McKenna & Scott Clayton about selecting him and the CEO had to step in and calm things down....McKenna wanted Fraser & Clayton wanted Will Minson.

Media Park · Post by **Media Park** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:19 am

I think Clayton had the brains there.

Post by **Dutchy** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:21 am

Am staggered that the Hawks and Demons are fighting over Hale, good for the Roos as we will get a good result either way for a guy that was going to get delisted anyway. After being a top 10 pick in the 2001 "Super Draft" (Hodge, Ball, Judd, Bartel, Montagna, Johnson, Brown, Mitchell, Swan) I think he is still living off the back of that.

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:25 am

Dutchy wrote:Am staggered that the Hawks and Demons are fighting over Hale, good for the Roos as we will get a good result either way for a guy that was going to get delisted anyway. After being a top 10 pick in the 2001 "Super Draft" (Hodge, Ball, Judd, Bartel, Montagna, Johnson, Brown, Mitchell, Swan) I think he is still living off the back of that.

You guys have McIntosh and Goldstein and perhaps Petrie if you didn't break him for good last season. Hale is a ruckman so this is why he was going to be delisted. Hawthorn have Taylor and Renouf LOL. Melbourne have Jamar who went OK last year but the back up is Johnson who is ordinary. This is what trade week is all about but yeah a good result for the Roos for sure.

regards,

REB

Media Park · Post by **Media Park** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:27 am

Dr REB. Why don't the Cats go after Hale then?

Because the only thing more embarrassing than Blake is Simpson and West.

Pup · Post by **Pup** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:30 am

cossi11 wrote:Houli Quits Essendon and demands a trade a Richmond.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Thought he was contracted?

Clearly not.

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:34 am

Media Park wrote:Dr REB. Why don't the Cats go after Hale then?

Because the only thing more embarrassing than Blake is Simpson and West.

Bit harsh. While it is getting harder and harder to make a case for Blake as the years go by I thought West and Simpson both showed something when they were given the opportunities. West showed he could haul down a contested mark against North at Cat park and Simpson didn't look out of place at Subiaco against Lurch no less.

Simpson is very raw and West is not that far off it. I was wondering if we might go for Hale especially as that big sook Blake is after a trade.

regards,

REB

trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

.

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

.

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Re: trade week 2010 Oct 5-11

Who is online