Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby smac » Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:01 pm

Very big on labelling people, aren't you Shrek? Some people can have opinions on things without acquiring an allegiance or fitting a mould.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13087
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby The Big Shrek » Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:07 pm

smac wrote:Very big on labelling people, aren't you Shrek? Some people can have opinions on things without acquiring an allegiance or fitting a mould.


Very big on taking things too seriously smac. Psyber labelled a group of people so I labelled him. It would take quite a while to describe all the nuances of someone's character in a post, so I'll stick to labels thanks.
The Big Shrek
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4464
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 368 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby redandblack » Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:28 pm

smac wrote:Very big on labelling people, aren't you Shrek? Some people can have opinions on things without acquiring an allegiance or fitting a mould.


You mean labels, rarely used on here, such as 'bleeding hearts', 'champagne socialists', 'chardonnay set', etc, etc, etc......
redandblack
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby The Big Shrek » Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:48 pm

Don't worry redandblack, smac was just looking for an excuse to have a go at me. He obviously doesn't have a problem with the issue itself as your post demonstrates.

I thought I had done well to coin the phrase post modern facist. All I've got to do now is define the classical and modern epoques.
The Big Shrek
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4464
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 368 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Drop Bear » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:10 pm

The Big Shrek wrote:Do you think refugees have bottomless pockets to pay for lawyers?


No, but apparently the Australian tax payers do.
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Psyber » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:22 pm

The Big Shrek wrote:..What a load of crap Psyber. Do you think refugees have bottomless pockets to pay for lawyers? Maybe there wouldn't be such a need for 'champions of the downtrodden' if the post-modern facists such as yourself weren't so intent on treading on them.
Are you really dense, Shrek, or is it just the dissembling game you play?
I didn't suggest the the alleged refugees had unlimited money, though some have had enough to get here. What the lawyers get is called "publicity" - a form of advertising, which generates money from other disssident do-gooder groups, and support from people who donate to the "cause".

Do you really think they are totally altruistic?

If you didn't rush into abusing people you diasagree with so quickly you may be able to work out what they are saying!
Last edited by Psyber on Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12224
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 395 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Psyber » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:24 pm

Quichey wrote:
Psyber wrote:We can't be "nice" to all and assume all alleged refugees are genuine - illegal arrival has benefits for agents of governments or of criminal organisations, by-passing security checks, and for the simply impatient who will not wait to apply and be assessed in the normal way. Only a firm line will inhibit this.


Think about it Psyber. One does not by-pass security checks without having valid papers. There has never been any evidence that those arriving by these channels are terrorists. Agents of governments or criminal organisations would have valid papers and probably fly first-class.
I would have thought they would want to not look like they were on expense accounts and have our people wonder where the money comes from...
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12224
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 395 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Psyber » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:26 pm

The Big Shrek wrote:... post-modern facists such as yourself weren't so intent on treading on them.
Hmm, maybe I need a lawyer. That sounds like slander to me!
On the other hand I didn't label anyone, contrary to your assertion. I just said terrorists or criminals may try to infiltrate among genuine refugees.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12224
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 395 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby mick » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:31 pm

The Big Shrek wrote:Ha ha, did you like that post modern facist remark mick?


You should learn to spell fascist first, perhaps you could identify one accurately then :roll:
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby The Big Shrek » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:39 pm

Psyber wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:... post-modern facists such as yourself weren't so intent on treading on them.
Hmm, maybe I need a lawyer. That sounds like slander to me!
On the other hand I didn't label anyone, contrary to your assertion. I just said terrorists or criminals may try to infiltrate among genuine refugees.


You did label lawyers as money hungry. Most probably are but not the ones representing refugees.
The Big Shrek
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4464
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 368 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby The Big Shrek » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:40 pm

mick wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:Ha ha, did you like that post modern facist remark mick?


You should learn to spell fascist first, perhaps you could identify one accurately then :roll:


Ah the old incorrect spelling comeback mick! Very imaginative!
The Big Shrek
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4464
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 368 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Psyber » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:44 pm

The Big Shrek wrote:
mick wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:Ha ha, did you like that post modern facist remark mick?
You should learn to spell fascist first, perhaps you could identify one accurately then :roll:
Ah the old incorrect spelling comeback mick! Very imaginative!
On par with being abusive then? :lol:
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12224
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 395 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby The Big Shrek » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:54 pm

Psyber wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:
mick wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:Ha ha, did you like that post modern facist remark mick?
You should learn to spell fascist first, perhaps you could identify one accurately then :roll:
Ah the old incorrect spelling comeback mick! Very imaginative!
On par with being abusive then? :lol:


Are you implying I was being abusive Psyber?
The Big Shrek
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4464
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 368 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby redandblack » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:00 pm

Add 'do-gooders' to the list ;)

(Does that mean you're against people who do good things, or are the opposite people 'do-badders').
redandblack
 

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby mick » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:13 pm

The Big Shrek wrote:
Psyber wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:... post-modern facists such as yourself weren't so intent on treading on them.
Hmm, maybe I need a lawyer. That sounds like slander to me!
On the other hand I didn't label anyone, contrary to your assertion. I just said terrorists or criminals may try to infiltrate among genuine refugees.


You did label lawyers as money hungry. Most probably are but not the ones representing refugees.


You really do live in La La Land. :roll:
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby The Big Shrek » Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:21 pm

mick wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:
Psyber wrote:
The Big Shrek wrote:... post-modern facists such as yourself weren't so intent on treading on them.
Hmm, maybe I need a lawyer. That sounds like slander to me!
On the other hand I didn't label anyone, contrary to your assertion. I just said terrorists or criminals may try to infiltrate among genuine refugees.


You did label lawyers as money hungry. Most probably are but not the ones representing refugees.


You really do live in La La Land. :roll:


Do you even know who represents asylum seekers in administrative detention?
The Big Shrek
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4464
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 368 times

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby mick » Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:38 pm

Illegal immigrants not asylum seekers, name one person in the current government who would publically endorse your fanciful notions. What has really changed since Howard in real terms?chipping around the edges like the changes to work choices.
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby smac » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:52 am

redandblack wrote:
smac wrote:Very big on labelling people, aren't you Shrek? Some people can have opinions on things without acquiring an allegiance or fitting a mould.


You mean labels, rarely used on here, such as 'bleeding hearts', 'champagne socialists', 'chardonnay set', etc, etc, etc......

Yes, all labels are overused, but TBS has admitted to trying to invent one of his own, that puts him one step ahead of the pack. ;)
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13087
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Q. » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:09 am

mick wrote:Illegal immigrants not asylum seekers, name one person in the current government who would publically endorse your fanciful notions. What has really changed since Howard in real terms?chipping around the edges like the changes to work choices.


Wrong. 97% of applicants from Iraq and 93% of applicants from Afghanistan seeking asylum without valid visas in Australia in 1999 were recognised as genuine refugees. Under Australian law they were found to be eligible to stay in Australia. Generally, 84% of all asylum seekers are found to be legitimate refugees and are able to stay in Australia.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Navy intercepts seventh boat of asylum-seekers in two months

Postby Q. » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:14 am

Psyber wrote:
Quichey wrote:
Psyber wrote:We can't be "nice" to all and assume all alleged refugees are genuine - illegal arrival has benefits for agents of governments or of criminal organisations, by-passing security checks, and for the simply impatient who will not wait to apply and be assessed in the normal way. Only a firm line will inhibit this.


Think about it Psyber. One does not by-pass security checks without having valid papers. There has never been any evidence that those arriving by these channels are terrorists. Agents of governments or criminal organisations would have valid papers and probably fly first-class.
I would have thought they would want to not look like they were on expense accounts and have our people wonder where the money comes from...


I don't believe you actually think that government agents or terrorists enter this country on rickety 'people smuggling' boats.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |