by Rik E Boy » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:29 am
by NO-MERCY » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:52 am
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:13 am
by RustyCage » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:27 am
NO-MERCY wrote:Feel sorry for the players but not the club.
They seriously have to look at their work rate as far as trainings concerned. ( overload )
Craig & Co think their "ROBOTS", have a look at the injuries sustained since Craig's taken over.
I think the science has gone to his head.
by Pup » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:35 am
NO-MERCY wrote:Feel sorry for the players but not the club.
They seriously have to look at their work rate as far as trainings concerned. ( overload )
Craig & Co think their "ROBOTS", have a look at the injuries sustained since Craig's taken over.
I think the science has gone to his head.
by NO-MERCY » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:40 am
pafc1870 wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Feel sorry for the players but not the club.
They seriously have to look at their work rate as far as trainings concerned. ( overload )
Craig & Co think their "ROBOTS", have a look at the injuries sustained since Craig's taken over.
I think the science has gone to his head.
None of those injuries have anything to do with overload.
by Booney » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:57 pm
by locky801 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:52 pm
Pup wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Feel sorry for the players but not the club.
They seriously have to look at their work rate as far as trainings concerned. ( overload )
Craig & Co think their "ROBOTS", have a look at the injuries sustained since Craig's taken over.
I think the science has gone to his head.
Wrong Wrong and Wrong!
What do any of those injuries have to do with overload?
by NO-MERCY » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:43 pm
by Andy #24 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:57 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Thankyou locky801, pup doesn't think you can get injuries from over training.
by Footy Chick » Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:39 pm
by smac » Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:51 pm
by am Bays » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:04 pm
smac wrote:Also can be attributed to being 'top heavy' I believe - the arms/shoulders/pecs are too bulky for the knees to carry when doing the twisting you speak of FC.
by smac » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:16 pm
by Andy #24 » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:36 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:ACL's are NOT an overuse injury and not necessarily an impact injury either, although in those instances you will not only do an ACL but your medial ligament will go with it as well..
ACL injuries are most commonly caused by pivoting,twisting or extending your knee beyond it's normal range of movement or control. Usually due to poor muscle conditioning around the knee and/or also poor footwear for the sport you are playing can also contribute as well.
I could rabbit on because I've dealt with them so much but I won't. But I will leave you with this little fact.
ACL injuries are more prelevant in women than men. Especially at "that time of the month"... true story...
by rogernumber10 » Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:54 am
by Dog_ger » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:26 am
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:29 am
by Punk Rooster » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:22 am
add- councils, historical groups, minority groups, Adelaideans against Progress etc...CUTTERMAN wrote:That's right Dogger, TD is said to be really hard because of the concrete only half a metre underneath the playing field, what I don't understand is why people are talking about building a new stadium over the rail yards on Nth Tce where you'd have the same problem, they'll probably put a roof on it to stop the grass from growing also. If the residents allow it in the first place.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |