by Johno6 » Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:53 pm
by kickinit » Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:55 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:helicopterking wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:The future
There has been worse players then him for port.
Jake Neade 2 kicks, 2 handballs.
Gray 3 kicks, 3 handballs
Carlile.
Not really a night for talls.
None have that nickname though. Should have given it too wingard.
P. S. Perfect night for talls. Dry and not a zephyr of breeze.
by Dols » Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:55 pm
by helicopterking » Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:58 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:59 pm
by Brodlach » Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:01 pm
Jim05 wrote:Well the Cows and Flowers losing will make my week somewhat bearable now
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Johno6 » Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:03 pm
by kickinit » Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:07 pm
Johno6 wrote:Will minson another 57 hit outs. Crazy.
by Strawb » Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:19 am
by LMA » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:53 am
Strawb wrote:I was at the game what an event. Gold Coast took it to the cats and pushed them for three quarters. The Cats lifted in the last to get over the line. Ablett's goal in the last the whole crowd cheered that one. The Gold Coast forced Geelong into making errors and they were great on the rebound. That side will be up there in a few years providing they hold onto talent. I was proud the cats got the win and put in a decent effort for three quarters and the cats of old in the last.
by Bully » Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:10 am
Johno6 wrote:Port reality check 101.
How did this same side with the first 5.
Lucky to beat a div 7 side ATM.
by kickinit » Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:36 pm
Bully wrote:Johno6 wrote:Port reality check 101.
How did this same side with the first 5.
Lucky to beat a div 7 side ATM.
as I stated or posted, the first 5 games should have been won as they were average to poor teams, with GWS,GC and melb in those, plus a showdown which is really anyones game in any year, but I was shouted down and told port would play in the finals and be basically a top 2 side.........hmmmm
by whufc » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:18 pm
kickinit wrote:Bully wrote:Johno6 wrote:Port reality check 101.
How did this same side with the first 5.
Lucky to beat a div 7 side ATM.
as I stated or posted, the first 5 games should have been won as they were average to poor teams, with GWS,GC and melb in those, plus a showdown which is really anyones game in any year, but I was shouted down and told port would play in the finals and be basically a top 2 side.........hmmmm
our first 5 should of been won? a showdown which is anyones game? and no mention of at the time a flag favourite west coast? So in other words what your saying is 3 of our first 5 where a definite win and 1 was a 50/50 and the other one was lucky.
At the end of the day all we can do is improve on last year. I don't expect them to make finals this year, we still have a lot of learning and growing to do. I'd also like to see the quote where you where shouted down that port would play finals and finish top 2.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:39 pm
by NO-MERCY » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:45 pm
by kickinit » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:46 pm
whufc wrote:kickinit wrote:Bully wrote:Johno6 wrote:Port reality check 101.
How did this same side with the first 5.
Lucky to beat a div 7 side ATM.
as I stated or posted, the first 5 games should have been won as they were average to poor teams, with GWS,GC and melb in those, plus a showdown which is really anyones game in any year, but I was shouted down and told port would play in the finals and be basically a top 2 side.........hmmmm
our first 5 should of been won? a showdown which is anyones game? and no mention of at the time a flag favourite west coast? So in other words what your saying is 3 of our first 5 where a definite win and 1 was a 50/50 and the other one was lucky.
At the end of the day all we can do is improve on last year. I don't expect them to make finals this year, we still have a lot of learning and growing to do. I'd also like to see the quote where you where shouted down that port would play finals and finish top 2.
after you produce the one that says the AFL reserves is a done deal in the SANFL!
by whufc » Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:51 pm
kickinit wrote:whufc wrote:When people use their signature to help promote my 'NO AFL IN THE SANFL' stance.
it's pretty funny when people try to promote even though it's already a done deal.
by Jim05 » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:47 pm
by Johno6 » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:56 pm
by am Bays » Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |