MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:I said 2 months ago the Crows were looking seriously at this.
And TBH why wouldn't they. Why persist in a league where the majority (except for the bean counters) clearly don't want you there.
Hey I'm all for it...go
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:12 am
MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:I said 2 months ago the Crows were looking seriously at this.
And TBH why wouldn't they. Why persist in a league where the majority (except for the bean counters) clearly don't want you there.
by MW » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:12 am
Dutchy wrote:“The SANFL competition is particularly strong and the evenness provides for great competition for all participating teams week-in and week- out. ”
Yep, Westies just had their first win for 364 days, pretty even comp there![]()
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:14 am
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:Part of that is true, but there needs to be greater incentive for Div 1 Ammo's and top country players to play SANFL, my point is there are plenty that have the skill and ability to play the level, there is not a lack on talent out there to have a robust strong top quality 2nd tier comp that is not reliant on 2 AFL teams. Keeping them at SANFL level is the key.
Conversely there are plenty of SANFL league players that come back to grassroots footy and struggle, that convinces me the gap is not that great.
Incentive = $$'s. From where?
by MW » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:26 am
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:Part of that is true, but there needs to be greater incentive for Div 1 Ammo's and top country players to play SANFL, my point is there are plenty that have the skill and ability to play the level, there is not a lack on talent out there to have a robust strong top quality 2nd tier comp that is not reliant on 2 AFL teams. Keeping them at SANFL level is the key.
Conversely there are plenty of SANFL league players that come back to grassroots footy and struggle, that convinces me the gap is not that great.
Incentive = $$'s. From where?
Not all incentive is dollar based, make it a competition that these players want to be involved in, currently it's not that.
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:34 am
MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:“The SANFL competition is particularly strong and the evenness provides for great competition for all participating teams week-in and week- out. ”
Yep, Westies just had their first win for 364 days, pretty even comp there![]()
Surely you are not blaming the Crows for Westies demise?
by Pseudo » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:38 am
MW wrote:ADELAIDE denies it is investigating moving its reserves team into the VFL and says its 15-year commitment to the SANFL is unchanged.
by Pseudo » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:43 am
MW wrote:“The SANFL enters into agreements with every intention to honour them."
by Jim05 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:13 am
am Bays wrote:heater31 wrote:Page 75 of today's fish wrap.....Crows deny costing study into VFL move.
Just like they have denied everything else in this shit sandwich
Course they've costed it, that's why they're happy with the current arrangement - it's cheaper than playing 20 games in Victoria because there's no way the Vicitorian based VFL clubs want to pay for travel over here - not even for one game a year.
by saintal » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:09 pm
MW wrote:
Port Adelaide plays home games at Alberton but the Crows agreed to play all their games away, however last year hosted Sturt in one game at Thebarton Oval which drew a crowd of 3123 people.
Other grounds that may be considered for a base include Norwood and Noarlunga which hosted a Crows’ pre-season games. The major tenant at Thebarton Oval is the Adelaide Footy League and its chief executive John Kernahan said he was not aware of any plans by the Crows to bring more games there.
by another grub » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:24 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:I would rather have a Norwood win with a comfortable margin than a win with a "nail biting" winning margin but would be happy with a win no matter what the margin.
by Pseudo » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:47 pm
saintal wrote: The Ravens are a waste of time/money for all concerned.
by StrayDog » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:38 pm
MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:I said 2 months ago the Crows were looking seriously at this.
And TBH why wouldn't they. Why persist in a league where the majority (except for the bean counters) clearly don't want you there.
by matt35 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:13 pm
by zipzap » Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:37 pm
Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:“The SANFL competition is particularly strong and the evenness provides for great competition for all participating teams week-in and week- out. ”
Yep, Westies just had their first win for 364 days, pretty even comp there![]()
Surely you are not blaming the Crows for Westies demise?
Not at all, this shows how disconnect the SANFL admin are, spruking the comp is so even, yet West don't have a win for a year?
Maybe if it was the Crows who hadn't won for a year it wouldn't have been said.
by Booney » Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:46 am
saintal wrote:MW wrote:
Port Adelaide plays home games at Alberton but the Crows agreed to play all their games away, however last year hosted Sturt in one game at Thebarton Oval which drew a crowd of 3123 people.
Other grounds that may be considered for a base include Norwood and Noarlunga which hosted a Crows’ pre-season games. The major tenant at Thebarton Oval is the Adelaide Footy League and its chief executive John Kernahan said he was not aware of any plans by the Crows to bring more games there.
Interesting that the article overlooks the Ravens "home" game this year at Woodville, a game against bitter rivals the Power reserves that drew a meagre 1348 viewers. The Ravens hosting games is a waste of time/money for all concerned.
by MW » Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:52 am
StrayDog wrote:MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:I said 2 months ago the Crows were looking seriously at this.
And TBH why wouldn't they. Why persist in a league where the majority (except for the bean counters) clearly don't want you there.
If that's the reason, then why push for the current arrangement in the first place?
If being so unloved in the SANFL is any surprise to them to this point, then they've had their heads further up their clackers than anyone has given them credit for.
by cennals05 » Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:21 am
MW wrote:StrayDog wrote:MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:I said 2 months ago the Crows were looking seriously at this.
And TBH why wouldn't they. Why persist in a league where the majority (except for the bean counters) clearly don't want you there.
If that's the reason, then why push for the current arrangement in the first place?
If being so unloved in the SANFL is any surprise to them to this point, then they've had their heads further up their clackers than anyone has given them credit for.
It was the best option at the time. Far better than allowing pleb coaches at SANFL level to control where and how your development players are playing.
by Jim05 » Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:24 am
MW wrote:StrayDog wrote:MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:I said 2 months ago the Crows were looking seriously at this.
And TBH why wouldn't they. Why persist in a league where the majority (except for the bean counters) clearly don't want you there.
If that's the reason, then why push for the current arrangement in the first place?
If being so unloved in the SANFL is any surprise to them to this point, then they've had their heads further up their clackers than anyone has given them credit for.
It was the best option at the time. Far better than allowing pleb coaches at SANFL level to control where and how your development players are playing.
by PhilH » Wed Jul 12, 2017 7:01 pm
by stan » Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:14 pm
PhilH wrote:AFLSA .... it's coming ... once WA folds it would not be long.
https://thewest.com.au/news/perth/wa-footy-mulls-afl-tie-for-stadium-cash-ng-b88533851z
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |