Stokes charges dropped

[Psyber]

Let's see what time brings - glossing over things never makes them go away.

[Bum Crack]

Shhh

It's Geelong, apparently they have dealt with it ( ) and we can all move on.

Now to go and check the double standards....

You're just dirty because we'll beat you by 130 points when he is back in the team.

[Rik E Boy]

Let's see what time brings - glossing over things never makes them go away.

Gloss or goss? So what exactly has Geelong covered up?

regards,

REB

[Rik E Boy]

Shhh

It's Geelong, apparently they have dealt with it ( ) and we can all move on.

Now to go and check the double standards....

...as long as we don't have to go through the West Parklands then we should be right.

regards,

REB

[Drop Bear]

Bit more justice than Malthouse, but still just a slap on the wrist.

[Booney]

Shhh

It's Geelong, apparently they have dealt with it ( ) and we can all move on.

Now to go and check the double standards....

...as long as we don't have to go through the West Parklands then we should be right.

regards,

REB

I think Stokes has actually been charged with drug possesion, actual charges laid, right? So why would it not be considered a double standard if a bloke who has been charged with drug possesion get less punishment than a bloke who was never charged by police with anything to do with drugs?

I think Dimwitriou is confusing Collingwood with Geelong on this one. Piss weak.

[Rik E Boy]

One off clanger vs. Consistent stupidity. Therein lies the difference IMO. I wonder if anyone has asked Vlad that very question though Boon.

regards,

REB

[Booney]

One off clanger vs. Consistent stupidity. Therein lies the difference IMO. I wonder if anyone has asked Vlad that very question though Boon.

regards,

REB

The AFL's silence on the matter in deafening.

[Rik E Boy]

One off clanger vs. Consistent stupidity. Therein lies the difference IMO. I wonder if anyone has asked Vlad that very question though Boon.

regards,

REB

The AFL's silence on the matter in deafening.

As it is about the salary cap. Speaking of double standards, I wonder if you or I would be the subject of all this bollocks for a gram of whatever? Yep - role models I know.

regards,

REB

[Dogwatcher]

I'm guessing I wouldn't be dragged through the media, but I'm certain I'd be sacked if I was faced with the same charges, downgraded charge or not.

[nuggety goodness]

One off clanger vs. Consistent stupidity. Therein lies the difference IMO. I wonder if anyone has asked Vlad that very question though Boon.

regards,

REB

The AFL's silence on the matter in deafening.

As it is about the salary cap. Speaking of double standards, I wonder if you or I would be the subject of all this bollocks for a gram of whatever? Yep - role models I know.

regards,

REB

and you really think it was a once off...?!? highly doubt it, he just got caught this time!

[Rik E Boy]

One off clanger vs. Consistent stupidity. Therein lies the difference IMO. I wonder if anyone has asked Vlad that very question though Boon.

regards,

REB

The AFL's silence on the matter in deafening.

As it is about the salary cap. Speaking of double standards, I wonder if you or I would be the subject of all this bollocks for a gram of whatever? Yep - role models I know.

regards,

REB

and you really think it was a once off...?!? highly doubt it, he just got caught this time!

Which is exactly what the 'three strikes' policy leads to but yes, I think it was a once off.

regards,

REB

[westcoastpanther]

Once off.........

Most people if they have dabbled with drugs had their once off at about 16-18 Reb.

Take the rose coloured glasses off, this is simply the first time he's been caught.

[Rik E Boy]

Once off.........

Most people if they have dabbled with drugs had their once off at about 16-18 Reb.

Take the rose coloured glasses off, this is simply the first time he's been caught.

Shame on you all. In the AFL world you are innocent until proven guilty.................three times!

regards,

Ossie Ostrich

[Bum Crack]

and he still has three strikes to go, because he hasn't tested positive. It was just an unfortunate incident, which luckily is now in the past. Gee he's gunna be good in a couple of weeks when he returns to the senior team. Picked up a lazy 41 possessions on the weekend too. U little ripper.

[Booney]

and he still has three strikes to go, because he hasn't tested positive. It was just an unfortunate incident, which luckily is now in the past. Gee he's gunna be good in a couple of weeks when he returns to the senior team. Picked up a lazy 41 possessions on the weekend too. U little ripper.

Pleaded guilt but hasn't tested positive, a bloke who was not guilty nor tested positive gets given a year off.

[Bum Crack]

and he still has three strikes to go, because he hasn't tested positive. It was just an unfortunate incident, which luckily is now in the past. Gee he's gunna be good in a couple of weeks when he returns to the senior team. Picked up a lazy 41 possessions on the weekend too. U little ripper.

Pleaded guilt but hasn't tested positive, a bloke who was not guilty nor tested positive gets given a year off.

Go Stokesy.

[Leaping Lindner]

AFL Premiers....

2006 - West Coast *
2007 - Geelong *
2008 - Hawthorn *
2009 - Geelong *

[Dogwatcher]

Living the high life.

[tipper]

and he still has three strikes to go, because he hasn't tested positive. It was just an unfortunate incident, which luckily is now in the past. Gee he's gunna be good in a couple of weeks when he returns to the senior team. Picked up a lazy 41 possessions on the weekend too. U little ripper.

Pleaded guilt but hasn't tested positive, a bloke who was not guilty nor tested positive gets given a year off.

so what did he book himself into rehab for? caffeine addiction??