by silent hour » Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:13 pm
by Newman » Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:19 pm
piccachu wrote:can anyone from seaton comment on how fenneys tribuneral hearing went last night,
godfrey from portland and wylde from mitcham both got off whilst bird didnt contest his 1 much ban
by Felch » Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:25 pm
Newman wrote:piccachu wrote:can anyone from seaton comment on how fenneys tribuneral hearing went last night,
godfrey from portland and wylde from mitcham both got off whilst bird didnt contest his 1 much ban
He got off mate
by stretch » Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:43 pm
by Newman » Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:04 pm
Felch wrote:Newman wrote:piccachu wrote:can anyone from seaton comment on how fenneys tribuneral hearing went last night,
godfrey from portland and wylde from mitcham both got off whilst bird didnt contest his 1 much ban
He got off mate
That must be some kind of record - 4 reports up there, 3 not guilty, and 1 getting a game !
by Felch » Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:21 pm
Newman wrote:Felch wrote:Newman wrote:piccachu wrote:can anyone from seaton comment on how fenneys tribuneral hearing went last night,
godfrey from portland and wylde from mitcham both got off whilst bird didnt contest his 1 much ban
He got off mate
That must be some kind of record - 4 reports up there, 3 not guilty, and 1 getting a game !
From what ive heard mate tribunal is a basket case at the moment too many egos trying to run the show with not much common sense. Good to hear Gods got off, good lad and a fair player very surprised to hear him on report
by simmos » Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:04 pm
Felch wrote:Newman wrote:piccachu wrote:can anyone from seaton comment on how fenneys tribuneral hearing went last night,
godfrey from portland and wylde from mitcham both got off whilst bird didnt contest his 1 much ban
He got off mate
That must be some kind of record - 4 reports up there, 3 not guilty, and 1 getting a game !
by HawkieRanger » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:39 am
by RHM 17 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:42 am
by schimma » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:00 am
by One Eyed » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:13 am
by Top End » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:06 am
by Footy Chick » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:32 am
by Hardy Hit » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:43 am
by Felch » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:45 am
Hardy Hit wrote:If anything i reckon PAC and Seaton are the only teams to prove that they might be top of the order teams. They've played opponents - who according to the lies and rubbish gossip talked on this forum- are the teams to beat. Mitcham and CBC have both played teams who are not taken too seriously - so they have more to prove in the next couple of weeks before people start looking at them as serious final contenders. Old Iggies and SMOSH are in the same boat. Para Hills are off to a shocking start but their reputation and performance last year still have people thinking they're top 4 stuff. Portland and Scotch are both goood sides who wont be going down to div 4 easily! and then theres poor kilburn...
I'd say... remembering we're only 2 rounds in! still heaps of time for clubs to turn their seasons around.. or turn to ****! but
sides playng finals
Seaton
PAC
sides fighting for finals/9th spot- no particular order
SMOSH
Mitcham
Iggies
CBC
Portland
Parahills
Scotch
Relegated
Kilburn
by X Runna » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:54 am
Felch wrote:Hardy Hit wrote:If anything i reckon PAC and Seaton are the only teams to prove that they might be top of the order teams. They've played opponents - who according to the lies and rubbish gossip talked on this forum- are the teams to beat. Mitcham and CBC have both played teams who are not taken too seriously - so they have more to prove in the next couple of weeks before people start looking at them as serious final contenders. Old Iggies and SMOSH are in the same boat. Para Hills are off to a shocking start but their reputation and performance last year still have people thinking they're top 4 stuff. Portland and Scotch are both goood sides who wont be going down to div 4 easily! and then theres poor kilburn...
I'd say... remembering we're only 2 rounds in! still heaps of time for clubs to turn their seasons around.. or turn to ****! but
sides playng finals
Seaton
PAC
sides fighting for finals/9th spot- no particular order
SMOSH
Mitcham
Iggies
CBC
Portland
Parahills
Scotch
Relegated
Kilburn
This worrying me HH, i actually agree with you !
by Felch » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:00 pm
X Runna wrote:Felch wrote:Hardy Hit wrote:If anything i reckon PAC and Seaton are the only teams to prove that they might be top of the order teams. They've played opponents - who according to the lies and rubbish gossip talked on this forum- are the teams to beat. Mitcham and CBC have both played teams who are not taken too seriously - so they have more to prove in the next couple of weeks before people start looking at them as serious final contenders. Old Iggies and SMOSH are in the same boat. Para Hills are off to a shocking start but their reputation and performance last year still have people thinking they're top 4 stuff. Portland and Scotch are both goood sides who wont be going down to div 4 easily! and then theres poor kilburn...
I'd say... remembering we're only 2 rounds in! still heaps of time for clubs to turn their seasons around.. or turn to ****! but
sides playng finals
Seaton
PAC
sides fighting for finals/9th spot- no particular order
SMOSH
Mitcham
Iggies
CBC
Portland
Parahills
Scotch
Relegated
Kilburn
This worrying me HH, i actually agree with you !
Be wary of CBCOC - they are a VERY GOOD side.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |