scottroo wrote:maccy beat kangys by 4 goals
Did the 2 Fizz brothers play? if so how did they go for there new club Maccy
by shoe boy » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:57 pm
scottroo wrote:maccy beat kangys by 4 goals
by benchmark » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:21 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
So basically they are just genuine thugs who continually do things to get suspended as opposed to possibly doing one stupid thing in an otherwise clean career.
by benchmark » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:24 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:34 pm
benchmark wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
So they are deregistered with saafl who are not affiliated with sanfl ?? Be interesting to speak to YP League ask why they were not allowed to play in that comp this year.
by Off The Wall » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:39 pm
shoe boy wrote:scottroo wrote:maccy beat kangys by 4 goals
Did the 2 Fizz brothers play? if so how did they go for there new club Maccy
by Brodlach » Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:05 pm
benchmark wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
So basically they are just genuine thugs who continually do things to get suspended as opposed to possibly doing one stupid thing in an otherwise clean career.
It is a concern that these guys are allowed to play. I wonder what will happen when they hit someone behind the play or break a jaw or an eye socket ,some teams have young kids playing and there is a duty of care for clubs. I would imagine when it happens it will create a large can of worms for the club and the league. It cant be good for the comp to have these guys running around.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by watchdog » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:10 pm
by the dentist » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:15 pm
by aceman » Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:24 am
benchmark wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
So they are deregistered with saafl who are not affiliated with sanfl ?? Be interesting to speak to YP League ask why they were not allowed to play in that comp this year.
by aceman » Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:28 am
the dentist wrote:how can clubs register players whove known drug issues?
by HB_Flanker » Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:26 am
benchmark wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
So basically they are just genuine thugs who continually do things to get suspended as opposed to possibly doing one stupid thing in an otherwise clean career.
It is a concern that these guys are allowed to play. I wonder what will happen when they hit someone behind the play or break a jaw or an eye socket ,some teams have young kids playing and there is a duty of care for clubs. I would imagine when it happens it will create a large can of worms for the club and the league. It cant be good for the comp to have these guys running around.
by 1250express » Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:07 pm
HB_Flanker wrote:
I think you need to take a pill and have a good lie down. Judge teams and players on what actually happens each week not on some wierdly biased view based on supposition. In which games last saturday did all the jaw breaking and socket crunching take place?
We all love "country" footy and the way its played compared to the SAAFL (which is why they need the 12 game rule and Hills doesnt). No Hills club is ever going to encourage or condone violence on the field. In fact many of the "thugs and ferrals" that seem to have you throwing your skirt over your head about have come up to the hills to get away from the undue aggression of city footy. Yes they are hard nuts and they will retaliate if pushed too far but its not what they want. If they do do something wrong and if based on facts they do desrve it throw the book at them taking in to account their past history. But until then trust the clubs to make the right decisions about the players they play
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:14 pm
watchdog wrote:How did TV play on the weekend?? See they were quite a few goals down early. Any players to come back into the side or were they full strength??
by 1250express » Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:26 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:watchdog wrote:How did TV play on the weekend?? See they were quite a few goals down early. Any players to come back into the side or were they full strength??
I think the Byrners were in Sydney for a pi$$up, sorry, wedding
by the big fella » Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:50 pm
by GWW » Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:03 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:25 pm
1250express wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:watchdog wrote:How did TV play on the weekend?? See they were quite a few goals down early. Any players to come back into the side or were they full strength??
I think the Byrners were in Sydney for a pi$$up, sorry, wedding
are they the kind of emo looking ones?
by benchmark » Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:20 pm
1250express wrote:HB_Flanker wrote:
I think you need to take a pill and have a good lie down. Judge teams and players on what actually happens each week not on some wierdly biased view based on supposition. In which games last saturday did all the jaw breaking and socket crunching take place?
We all love "country" footy and the way its played compared to the SAAFL (which is why they need the 12 game rule and Hills doesnt). No Hills club is ever going to encourage or condone violence on the field. In fact many of the "thugs and ferrals" that seem to have you throwing your skirt over your head about have come up to the hills to get away from the undue aggression of city footy. Yes they are hard nuts and they will retaliate if pushed too far but its not what they want. If they do do something wrong and if based on facts they do desrve it throw the book at them taking in to account their past history. But until then trust the clubs to make the right decisions about the players they play
now thats a comment that has some merit!
by fruit_box » Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:43 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:1250express wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:watchdog wrote:How did TV play on the weekend?? See they were quite a few goals down early. Any players to come back into the side or were they full strength??
I think the Byrners were in Sydney for a pi$$up, sorry, wedding
are they the kind of emo looking ones?
No - very normal
by the breezer » Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:29 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |