Warren Partland Article

[redandblack]

With respect,

1 Centrals

2 Your faith is misplaced.

3 Norwood

4 As nickname said, that's opinion

5 I can think of many topics vastly more boring, but that's just my opinion too.

6 If you think it's boring, why read it or post?

[Barto]

6 If you think it's boring, why read it or post?

Boredom?

[Dutchy]

With respect,

1 Centrals

2 Your faith is misplaced.

3 Norwood

4 As nickname said, that's opinion

5 I can think of many topics vastly more boring, but that's just my opinion too.

6 If you think it's boring, why read it or post?

So centrals have won a flag by being over the significantly over the cap - fact or heresay?

So they dont audit the clubs?

Where did Norwood benefit from their indiscretion?

to moderate the thread if necessary, history shows salary cap threads need a close eye on them

[redandblack]

1 Yes, Centrals did. You've now added the word 'significantly' and it wasn't significant. I was answering your original point.

2 Yes, they do audit the clubs. No-one would pretend it's a full and foolproof audit.

3 Norwood signed several ex-Sydney Swans players, among others, and won games because of it. They're now paying a heavy price and IMO would consider themselves no orphans in the action they took.

4 By all means we should keep an eye on salary cap threads, but there has been no problem with this legitimate discussion following the recent news about North's breach. Why act now?

Surely the forum can withstand a reasonable discussion about a relevant important football matter without posting that it's boring?

With great respect, there are many boring topics on any forum. I'm not sure that it helps, or is necessary, if we post that we think they're boring?

[Dutchy]

just my opinion that its boring, play on

[Mr Irate]

1 Yes, Centrals did. You've now added the word 'significantly' and it wasn't significant. I was answering your original point.

2 Yes, they do audit the clubs. No-one would pretend it's a full and foolproof audit.

3 Norwood signed several ex-Sydney Swans players, among others, and won games because of it. They're now paying a heavy price and IMO would consider themselves no orphans in the action they took.

4 By all means we should keep an eye on salary cap threads, but there has been no problem with this legitimate discussion following the recent news about North's breach. Why act now?

Surely the forum can withstand a reasonable discussion about a relevant important football matter without posting that it's boring?

With great respect, there are many boring topics on any forum. I'm not sure that it helps, or is necessary, if we post that we think they're boring?

Actually Centrals went over the cap AFTER they won the flag when they gave each player a video of our first premiership triumph, and a player to watch it on.

[whufc]

1 Yes, Centrals did. You've now added the word 'significantly' and it wasn't significant. I was answering your original point.

2 Yes, they do audit the clubs. No-one would pretend it's a full and foolproof audit.

3 Norwood signed several ex-Sydney Swans players, among others, and won games because of it. They're now paying a heavy price and IMO would consider themselves no orphans in the action they took.

4 By all means we should keep an eye on salary cap threads, but there has been no problem with this legitimate discussion following the recent news about North's breach. Why act now?

Surely the forum can withstand a reasonable discussion about a relevant important football matter without posting that it's boring?

With great respect, there are many boring topics on any forum. I'm not sure that it helps, or is necessary, if we post that we think they're boring?

Actually Centrals went over the cap AFTER they won the flag when they gave each player a video of our first premiership triumph, and a player to watch it on.

Oh geez now you have came in a added fact to the topic shame on you.