by JAS » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:05 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:08 pm
by am Bays » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:08 pm
by bloods08 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:11 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:13 pm
by UKPanther » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:13 pm
by whufc » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:15 pm
by gadj1976 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:18 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:20 pm
by Columbo » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:22 pm
by hot dogs » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:24 pm
by JAS » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:30 pm
by NFC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:40 pm
by whufc » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:42 pm
NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:44 pm
whufc wrote:NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
Sorry mate but the signs are never good when you lose to South at home, that kind of mentality will keep Norwood at the bottom for a very long time.
by NFC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:45 pm
whufc wrote:NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
Sorry mate but the signs are never good when you lose to South at home, that kind of mentality will keep Norwood at the bottom for a very long time.
by NFC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:46 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
Sorry mate but the signs are never good when you lose to South at home, that kind of mentality will keep Norwood at the bottom for a very long time.
Blaming the umpires too?
by Mickyj » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:50 pm
by DOC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:53 pm
NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
by NFC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:55 pm
DOC wrote:NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
Just home. I think we got a number of decisions in the third which certainly did not hurt.
I thought the game was very enjoyable to watch. Very fast.
New lights are excellent. Norwood looked quite capable moving the ball up the ground. Doyle injured again in what I think is the first time he has played against us.
Don't know that the physical off the ball stuff suited Norwood. I think the two targetted players (Warren and Crabb) did very well to remain focused and were amongst the better players. Cockshell very dominant.
Rodan looked very good, pacy, accurate and broke quite a number of tackles. Mckernan for South looked out of sorts. Talia finding the step up a big one.
Pretty happy.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |