buckley05 wrote:i hear sailsbury west are recruiting already for next year a mate of mine said he is thinking about going to westies after being asked to consider the move to westies
is he any good though?

by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Mar 30, 2010 4:59 pm
buckley05 wrote:i hear sailsbury west are recruiting already for next year a mate of mine said he is thinking about going to westies after being asked to consider the move to westies
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:34 am
buckley05 wrote:i hear sailsbury west are recruiting already for next year a mate of mine said he is thinking about going to westies after being asked to consider the move to westies
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:26 am
buckley05 wrote:i hear sailsbury west are recruiting already for next year a mate of mine said he is thinking about going to westies after being asked to consider the move to westies
by rainbow warrior » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:39 am
Wizard of Oz wrote:buckley05 wrote:i hear sailsbury west are recruiting already for next year a mate of mine said he is thinking about going to westies after being asked to consider the move to westies
Port District hey ? Is that Coop you are talking about ? He aint going anywhere !
by custardarm » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:52 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:custardarm wrote:just a thought for the wizard of oz , surely salisbury west considered having joint premiers as the game was a draw as i believe in the past that a similar situation resulted in an extraordinary meeting of pdca officials to see the rules amended so as to ensure a joint premiership, im sorry but with R&C's stellar day one performance it would have been good to see sw do the right thing and offer to share the spoils with R&C who were forced to in ridiculous circumstances previously , just a thought
spot on
Well maybe South Australia should offer Western Australia the 1995/96 Sheffield Shield too ?
by saveyourlegs » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:31 pm
custardarm wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:custardarm wrote:just a thought for the wizard of oz , surely salisbury west considered having joint premiers as the game was a draw as i believe in the past that a similar situation resulted in an extraordinary meeting of pdca officials to see the rules amended so as to ensure a joint premiership, im sorry but with R&C's stellar day one performance it would have been good to see sw do the right thing and offer to share the spoils with R&C who were forced to in ridiculous circumstances previously , just a thought
spot on
Well maybe South Australia should offer Western Australia the 1995/96 Sheffield Shield too ?
well explain how you guys claimed a premiership when you finished below R&C and tied the grand final maybe australia should share the world cup with south africa
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:46 pm
custardarm wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:custardarm wrote:just a thought for the wizard of oz , surely salisbury west considered having joint premiers as the game was a draw as i believe in the past that a similar situation resulted in an extraordinary meeting of pdca officials to see the rules amended so as to ensure a joint premiership, im sorry but with R&C's stellar day one performance it would have been good to see sw do the right thing and offer to share the spoils with R&C who were forced to in ridiculous circumstances previously , just a thought
spot on
Well maybe South Australia should offer Western Australia the 1995/96 Sheffield Shield too ?
well explain how you guys claimed a premiership when you finished below R&C and tied the grand final maybe australia should share the world cup with south africa
by saveyourlegs » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:24 pm
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:07 pm
saveyourlegs wrote:Well if that grand final that year was a semi final who would went through?
by catchit » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:39 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:saveyourlegs wrote:Well if that grand final that year was a semi final who would went through?
Come on dude....too many hypotheticals.
by catchit » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:43 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:buckley05 wrote:i hear sailsbury west are recruiting already for next year a mate of mine said he is thinking about going to westies after being asked to consider the move to westies
Port District hey ? Is that Coop you are talking about ? He aint going anywhere !
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:33 pm
catchit wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:saveyourlegs wrote:Well if that grand final that year was a semi final who would went through?
Come on dude....too many hypotheticals.
thats a far question though... how can the rule be diff from a semi?? fair enough it rains it rains and the rule is the same but a tie is diff... where is the advantage in that of being the best side all year??
by Wizard of Oz » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:34 pm
catchit wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:buckley05 wrote:i hear sailsbury west are recruiting already for next year a mate of mine said he is thinking about going to westies after being asked to consider the move to westies
Port District hey ? Is that Coop you are talking about ? He aint going anywhere !
bloody hell its a good job shane watson signed a new deal... surely cant be talking to these players without a little carrot waving going on??
by SmithyOTH » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:33 pm
by saveyourlegs » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:36 pm
SmithyOTH wrote:Congrats to figgs on winning the div1 player of the year. very well deserved and steered his team from relegation last year to the grand final this year.
by cricket1012010 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:47 pm
saveyourlegs wrote:SmithyOTH wrote:Congrats to figgs on winning the div1 player of the year. very well deserved and steered his team from relegation last year to the grand final this year.
yes congrats noel, could of been a premiership too
by cricket1012010 » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:54 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:catchit wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:saveyourlegs wrote:Well if that grand final that year was a semi final who would went through?
Come on dude....too many hypotheticals.
thats a far question though... how can the rule be diff from a semi?? fair enough it rains it rains and the rule is the same but a tie is diff... where is the advantage in that of being the best side all year??
Thats all well and good....but dont blame Salisbury West for that. Russ should've just tickled one off the pads for one
by Wizard of Oz » Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:17 am
by Browny25 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:30 am
by saveyourlegs » Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:43 am
Browny25 wrote:The tied GF had a result as such, but a rained out match is a no result...
You arent awarded the points during the year for a rained / heat rule game, so why should it be different in a final.
However, what do you do? Play on the Mnday? Next weekend? Just couldnt happen so the rules are there to award the higher placed team...
Wont change people.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |