by zedman » Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:37 pm
by Demon Juke » Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:56 pm
by The Real Number 3 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:59 am
by Old Dog 13 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:23 am
by Lance's brother » Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:40 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:43 am
by cossi11 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:01 am
by BenchedEagle » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:22 am
by fido bedow » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:37 am
Lance's brother wrote:BOSFC v North Haven - Don’t know much about North Haven, but loss of Milikan and Parish for BOS worries me.
Hectorville v Adelaide Lutheran - Have heard Lutheran have recruited nicely.
Brahma Lodge v Rosewater - Brahma with a few quality Ins, Rosewater without Horshell.
Plympton v Elizabeth - Both teams with some good recruits, but Plympton missing Jimmy first up I believe and Elizabeth start well.
Hope Valley v Smithfield - Like what I hear out of Smithfield, but HV at home.
by Executive Member » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:42 am
fido bedow wrote:Lance's brother wrote:BOSFC v North Haven - Don’t know much about North Haven, but loss of Milikan and Parish for BOS worries me.
Hectorville v Adelaide Lutheran - Have heard Lutheran have recruited nicely.
Brahma Lodge v Rosewater - Brahma with a few quality Ins, Rosewater without Horshell.
Plympton v Elizabeth - Both teams with some good recruits, but Plympton missing Jimmy first up I believe and Elizabeth start well.
Hope Valley v Smithfield - Like what I hear out of Smithfield, but HV at home.
Jimmy or no jimmy plympton will win and win easy forward line will be best in the comp!
by zedman » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:47 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:56 am
The Real Number 3 wrote:What did you think of last nights game LM?
by Robran » Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:08 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:BOSFC v North Haven @ Klemzig
Hectorville v Adelaide Lutheran @ Daly
Brahma Lodge v Rosewater @ Brahma Lodge
Plympton v Elizabeth @ Plympton
Hope Valley v Smithfield @ Hope Valley
by Robran » Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:12 pm
custardarm wrote:Jabber wrote:custardarm wrote:Jabber wrote:
No, not your idea as silly, just the exercise of clubs, or club representatives, self tyre pumping about the fact that they do not pay players, like its some sort of 'off field victory' that they can put a great side on the park and not pay them. Its insane. Time wasting a plenty. Especially if it turns out that they are paying them, by way of sponsors. In my opinion if you have money in the budget for it, then responsibly go and do it. No big deal.
i think u will find that those stating non payment (LM, duncs and myself) were merely responding to implications they were and it seems people like to throw it out there early just in case you have a good year so the old so how much did that flag cost ya can come out proudly hehe ,for what its worth teams without juniors have to i think to progress up the div's and i dont see a problem whether you do or dont pay as long as you have a club structure that can support it and not destroy clubs as we have all seen in the past
Fair call. I just think it would be refreshing to hear a club say 'yeah we pay players, big deal'. Instead of all this garbage that we read on here and hear throught he grape vine.
The most important point here i think is the reason that most people don't believe there are clubs that aren't paying, is because there are definately clubs that are paying and they are saying that they are not. Makes it hard for those that actually don't pay to say they don't. having said that, does it make the club a better club if they don't pay? or for that matter if they do pay?
There are arguments for each. But my opinion is who cares! Whatever your doing, just do it, but DONT LIE ABOUT IT
IMO idont care if anyone pays or not and i damn well hope we (elizabeth) aren't paying anyone cos in my 17th year of playing now i havent seen a cent haha they better pay retrospectively i'd be up for a bit of coin
by Executive Member » Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:17 pm
Robran wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:BOSFC v North Haven @ Klemzig
Hectorville v Adelaide Lutheran @ Daly
Brahma Lodge v Rosewater @ Brahma Lodge
Plympton v Elizabeth @ Plympton
Hope Valley v Smithfield @ Hope Valley
heccies vs a lutheran, lutheran by 5 goals
bosfc vs haven, bosfc by 12 goals
lodge vs rosewater draw
plympton vs elizabeth eagles by under 2 goals
valley vs smithfield panthers by 4 goals
by unknown source » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:23 pm
by unknown source » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:30 pm
zedman wrote:BOSFC v North Haven @ Klemzig
Hectorville v Adelaide Lutheran @ Daly
Brahma Lodge v Rosewater @ Brahma Lodge
Plympton v Elizabeth @ Plympton
Hope Valley v Smithfield @ Hope Valley
by The Dark Knight » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:33 pm
LMA wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:sprinttospace wrote:i know its still 15 days until the first bounce, but i thought some tipping may be in order to create some interest in the games.
LM, time to drag out your tipping spreadsheet from '09 if you wouldn't mind.
BOSFC v North Haven @ Klemzig
Hectorville v Adelaide Lutheran @ Daly
Brahma Lodge v Rosewater @ Brahma Lodge
Plympton v Elizabeth @ Plympton - match of the round IMO
Hope Valley v Smithfield @ Hope Valley
I'll go with,
Us over BF-It will be nice to play at Klemzig, our coach from last year SOD, who coaches Gaza's Reserves might come and have a look after their game. I so wanna see him again, not![]()
Lutheran over Hectoville
The Blodge over Rosewater
Elizabeth over plympton
Smithfield over Hope Valley
Triple Header that day TDK our C grade are playing Gaza after your A's.
by The Dark Knight » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:41 pm
Lance's brother wrote:BOSFC v [b]North Haven - Don’t know much about North Haven, but loss of Milikan and Parish for BOS worries me.[/b]Hectorville v Adelaide Lutheran - Have heard Lutheran have recruited nicely.
Brahma Lodge v Rosewater - Brahma with a few quality Ins, Rosewater without Horshell.
Plympton v [b]Elizabeth - Both teams with some good recruits, but Plympton missing Jimmy first up I believe and Elizabeth start well.[/b]Hope Valley v Smithfield - Like what I hear out of Smithfield, but HV at home.
by jointman » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:45 pm
S Demon wrote:Why don't all the clubs across the whole amateur league sign some kind of treaty that states no club will pay players and any club caught doing so will be banned from the league for 12 months or something like that. That way we can weed out all the greedy "shop themselves around" players, the smaller struggling clubs will still be here in 10 years time and we can return to what this competion is actually called - South Australia AMATEUR Football League.
Imagine how much money could be saved across all the divisions and spent on other things around the clubs? It's not like we win prizemoney for winning flags, so why invest so much?
Just a thought...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |