
by Bradman » Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:50 pm
by Executive Member » Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:55 pm
Bradman wrote:With Brahma Lodge Smithfield and Elizabeth all vying for top 3 and all wont lose a game its a wonder a motion for the CDFA to be brought back has not come up.All teams from the North all Powerhouses again
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:56 pm
Bradman wrote:With Brahma Lodge Smithfield and Elizabeth all vying for top 3 and all wont lose a game its a wonder a motion for the CDFA to be brought back has not come up.All teams from the North all Powerhouses again
by Bradman » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:00 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:02 pm
Bradman wrote:wont know anything after round 1!
as for top 3 just going by 3 months of reading thats all
by Executive Member » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:02 pm
Bradman wrote:wont know anything after round 1!
as for top 3 just going by 3 months of reading thats all
by Bradman » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:05 pm
by zedman » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:20 pm
Bradman wrote:With Brahma Lodge Smithfield and Elizabeth all vying for top 3 and all wont lose a game its a wonder a motion for the CDFA to be brought back has not come up.All teams from the North all Powerhouses again
by sprinttospace » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:06 pm
by Iron Fist » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:07 pm
Bradman wrote:May aswell not!
But unless you can get a message to Isurava i wont have clue
by Purple Cobra's » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:28 pm
Iron Fist wrote:Bradman wrote:May aswell not!
But unless you can get a message to Isurava i wont have clue
How come u didnt play in the trial friday night bradman??
by Executive Member » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:29 pm
sprinttospace wrote:no stressing browny i just thought it was interesting reading.
it provided 2.5 pages of posts in one afternoon so it got some attention.
everyone loves an underdog.
zedman - no parish, no finals - part 1 correct but i hope you're part 2 prediction is off. its a big hit for us though.
by sprinttospace » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:35 pm
Executive Member wrote:sprinttospace wrote:no stressing browny i just thought it was interesting reading.
it provided 2.5 pages of posts in one afternoon so it got some attention.
everyone loves an underdog.
zedman - no parish, no finals - part 1 correct but i hope you're part 2 prediction is off. its a big hit for us though.
my work here is done
by Footy Chick » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:38 pm
Purple Cobra's wrote:Iron Fist wrote:Bradman wrote:May aswell not!
But unless you can get a message to Isurava i wont have clue
How come u didnt play in the trial friday night bradman??
I heard he is not playing until he gets back from Kokoda, any truth to this Bradman?
by Executive Member » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:39 pm
sprinttospace wrote:Executive Member wrote:sprinttospace wrote:no stressing browny i just thought it was interesting reading.
it provided 2.5 pages of posts in one afternoon so it got some attention.
everyone loves an underdog.
zedman - no parish, no finals - part 1 correct but i hope you're part 2 prediction is off. its a big hit for us though.
my work here is done
you were one of us back in the day but put us at the bottom of the tote ... bad memories EM
by Footy Chick » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:40 pm
by Executive Member » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:44 pm
Footy Chick wrote:and he probably didnt want to stick Heccies at the bottom for risk of looking like a sore loser![]()
by Executive Member » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:45 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |