Gowser wrote:wycbloods wrote:Section 1 SF umpires.
Keswick Vs Coromandel at Marymount Graeme Gow and Ray Thatcher
fantastic.
Don't get hit on the pads

by wycbloods » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:12 pm
Gowser wrote:wycbloods wrote:Section 1 SF umpires.
Keswick Vs Coromandel at Marymount Graeme Gow and Ray Thatcher
fantastic.
by The Crunch » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:26 pm
OSB RD. wrote:wycbloods wrote:Tight_Lines wrote:Will Defiantly be a good finals run and although Coro have a very good bowling attack they will struggle to contain or chase whatever Keswick hit as Coro's batting didnt look the greatest outside of Cheek from what I saw but they are certainly the form side going in.
Also although we had a shocking last few games had we won our last 2 we could had been playing finals yet we lose and we finish 10th shows how even the comp was this year hopefully it stays that way for a while.
I think Sheidow Pk will benefit from the amount game time you have given to younger kids in the years to come as will Nth Haven.
South Road, Plympton and WOS have the most concerns i feel as they didn't seem to have young sides.
I think Plympton have juniors though so they should be right over the next few years.
I wouldn't think age is a problem at sth road with our top 4 being 20, 23, 21 and 20. And we've also had a number of players throughout the year play aged from 19 to mid twenties, Which I wouldn't think is too old for this standard. Getting them to commit to an entire season is a problem tho.
by Jabber » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:08 am
wycbloods wrote:Bulldogs007 wrote:
ARE YOU SURE.....Plympton all season have had a yound side....people over 30 that have played this season are Giersch, Patterson, Habib and Naismith, and only Giersch played all season next oldest player after that is Jadd Brooker at 27......Very old side i must say
Maybe a few just look older then. Could have sworn a few of the guys who played against us were the wrong side of 30.
by someguy1 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:02 am
by Booney » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:28 am
wycbloods wrote:bazza1 wrote:Dont run in front of the umpire either Bloods
Funny you say that i brought that up last night.
So as of next season there will be strict measurement checks on all umpires to ensure both me and them can fit on the same pitch![]()
they know i won't be changing down so it has to be them. Bloody umpires costing me wickets
![]()
.
by wycbloods » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:03 am
Jabber wrote:wycbloods wrote:Bulldogs007 wrote:
ARE YOU SURE.....Plympton all season have had a yound side....people over 30 that have played this season are Giersch, Patterson, Habib and Naismith, and only Giersch played all season next oldest player after that is Jadd Brooker at 27......Very old side i must say
Maybe a few just look older then. Could have sworn a few of the guys who played against us were the wrong side of 30.
My guts looks like it's over 30
by wycbloods » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:06 am
Booney wrote:wycbloods wrote:bazza1 wrote:Dont run in front of the umpire either Bloods
Funny you say that i brought that up last night.
So as of next season there will be strict measurement checks on all umpires to ensure both me and them can fit on the same pitchthey know i won't be changing down so it has to be them. Bloody umpires costing me wickets
![]()
.
The ICC introducing new pitch dimensions?
by Booney » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:31 am
by bazza1 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:50 pm
someguy1 wrote:After no showing the meeting last night we should have a new bottom side in Section 1, congratulations South Road.
by wycbloods » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:17 pm
bazza1 wrote:someguy1 wrote:After no showing the meeting last night we should have a new bottom side in Section 1, congratulations South Road.
???
by Roseboy » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:35 pm
wycbloods wrote:bazza1 wrote:someguy1 wrote:After no showing the meeting last night we should have a new bottom side in Section 1, congratulations South Road.
???
I think SG would be referring to the rule that if you miss 3 meetings you lose 6 match points from all grades.
by wycbloods » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:42 pm
Roseboy wrote:wycbloods wrote:bazza1 wrote:someguy1 wrote:After no showing the meeting last night we should have a new bottom side in Section 1, congratulations South Road.
???
I think SG would be referring to the rule that if you miss 3 meetings you lose 6 match points from all grades.
Interesting... will this likely be enforced Bloods?
by Westsider » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:07 pm
by OSB RD. » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:29 pm
someguy1 wrote:After no showing the meeting last night we should have a new bottom side in Section 1, congratulations South Road.
by wycbloods » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:30 pm
OSB RD. wrote:someguy1 wrote:After no showing the meeting last night we should have a new bottom side in Section 1, congratulations South Road.
Spoken to a comittee member and they r positive that is only the second meeting we have missed.
by The Dark Knight » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:41 pm
CoverKing wrote:NH have had players under 30 and above this year. I think they have had a good mixture of youth. young Quirk is 16/17, Brad Christie 18, elder Quirk 21, The Dark Night is around 20 i would think, Recizsen is a young fella, along with their captain Potts who is 27 (?), Lipson is only 23 or so, along with the keeper that made runs against us, Ellis who is mid twenties i would think. Some good youth in that side!
SR, when we played them were extremely old, pretty average in the field and extremely slow. Peterson, Williams x 2, Hutchy, the other opener and also Adam hartlettt, who although young, will not finish the year off at all due to football committments. WOS and Morphys, with age have bigger problems though i do believe
by The Dark Knight » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:42 pm
CoverKing wrote:wycbloods wrote:Well he umpired us in round 3 against South Rd.
Mick Dibben did that game ya peanut. Harvey with the ridiculous LBW that he got for the last wicket?
by The Dark Knight » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:44 pm
bazza1 wrote:someguy1 wrote:After no showing the meeting last night we should have a new bottom side in Section 1, congratulations South Road.
???
by The Dark Knight » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:47 pm
bazza1 wrote:First game of the year we had Mick Dibben, our number 11 was batting smashed it on to his pads and he gave it out. Found out later that he said " He wasnt going to win them the game, so I gave it out"![]()
If either side is bowled out early on saturday, make sure John Zadow takes the ball homeNot convinced Alan is up to a Section 1 semi final yet, made a few mistakes and wasnt entirely certain on some rules.
by wycbloods » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:54 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:CoverKing wrote:wycbloods wrote:Well he umpired us in round 3 against South Rd.
Mick Dibben did that game ya peanut. Harvey with the ridiculous LBW that he got for the last wicket?
Brotherly love
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |