SA Churches and Community Cricket Association 2009-10

[Phantom Gossiper]

lazy hundgee? .... $100.00

oh and a subway platter courtesty of PV major high roller billionare sponsor

[No1_Source]

you probably should have come to training obb people u have named arent even playing hahaha and it will be interesting if adelaide luthern have the same side that defeated brooklyn park few whispers

[Mr Miraculous]

Div 1:Para Vista(too much finals experience to lose this game and they wont..R Marshall BOG )
Div 2:Rose Park(B Reidy to make a ton,cant see WK 11 bowling attack getting this bloke out..he is a run machine!!!!
Div 3:Paralowie
Div 4:Adelaide Lutheran(i hate to say it but M Briene to have a day out in this game..a 5 for or even more but i would love to be proved wrong )
Div 5:Enfield(after having seen PV first hand this season i cant believe so many ppl are picking them..get there top 3 batsmen out cheaply and the game will be over assuming they have a pretty similar team last time we played them ...and with the likes of Ryan,Hill,Mcleod,Daniels etc we will fielding a very strong team i imagine who are proven to be finals performers so cant go past Enfield to win!!!!!!)

Best of luck to everyone playing in GF's tomorrow

And I believe that same Para Vista Div 5 side defeated our Div 5 side...

[auto]

you probably should have come to training obb people u have named arent even playing hahaha and it will be interesting if adelaide luthern have the same side that defeated brooklyn park few whispers :P

not sure if the stats on the website are correct, i assume they would be, but dont you have to play 3 games in a year to qualify for finals? And more games in the lower grade than the higher grade to qualify for the lower grade?

Good luck to all in the GF's cept ofcourse Para Vista in Div 1. Uuuuuu ROOooooyysss!

[No1_Source]

i thought the 3 games was a rule too but have been informed that if all teams make the finals this isnt the case you can select anyone? i found this weird..

[Ecky]

D-Grade Grand Final

Enfield all out for 150 off 62.1 overs. Mikey Johns batted all day to be the last batsman out for 78. Micah Briene took 6/22 off 21.1 overs.

All the Adelaide Lutheran players playing in this game are definitely eligible to play in the finals under the rules of the association.

[Phantom Gossiper]

A-Grade Granny scores- Para Vista won the toss and batted, all out for 207. Were in trouble early, (3/20) before Marshall (55), Smith, Bevan and Goedecke (all 30-odd) rallied to help the Herders toward a competitive total. For the Roys, Giglio, Bacon and Bourke all amongst the wickets. Should be an exciting Day 2 next week.

Whats the divvy 5 scores?

[spintwin]

A-Grade Granny scores- Para Vista won the toss and batted, all out for 207. Were in trouble early, (3/20) before Marshall (55), Smith, Bevan and Goedecke (all 30-odd) rallied to help the Herders toward a competitive total. For the Roys, Giglio, Bacon and Bourke all amongst the wickets. Should be an exciting Day 2 next week.

Whats the divvy 5 scores?

Enfield Made 205. Para Vista 1 for 8. Sgould be a tight game.

[Phantom Gossiper]

A-Grade Granny scores- Para Vista won the toss and batted, all out for 207. Were in trouble early, (3/20) before Marshall (55), Smith, Bevan and Goedecke (all 30-odd) rallied to help the Herders toward a competitive total. For the Roys, Giglio, Bacon and Bourke all amongst the wickets. Should be an exciting Day 2 next week.

Whats the divvy 5 scores?

Enfield Made 205. Para Vista 1 for 8. Sgould be a tight game.

come on Enfield.. i want Aces money lol

[bored]

D-Grade Grand Final

Enfield all out for 150 off 62.1 overs. Mikey Johns batted all day to be the last batsman out for 78. Micah Briene took 6/22 off 21.1 overs.

All the Adelaide Lutheran players playing in this game are definitely eligible to play in the finals under the rules of the association.

WTF is Micah doing in the D's? he will kill people down there

Go you Vistas, will be out cheering the A's on next week... Should I bring my whites in case you need a 12th man???

[Goat Herder]

Just to clarify this particular law of the game (ie; not a bylaw or C&CCA match rule) that just so happened to occur yesterday during the Div 1 GF ;

Law 2, Subsection 5. Fielder absent or leaving the field

If a fielder fails to take the field with his side at the start of the match or at any later time, or leaves the field during a session of play,

(a) the umpire shall be informed of the reason for his absence.

(b) he shall not thereafter come on to the field during a session of play without the consent of the umpire. See 6 below. The umpire shall give such consent as soon as is practicable.

(c) if he is absent for 15 minutes or longer, he shall not be permitted to bowl thereafter, subject to (i), (ii) or (iii) below, until he has been on the field for at least that length of playing time for which he was absent.


For the record, (i), (ii) and (iii) are irrelevant in this case, but are as follows ;

(i) Absence or penalty for time absent shall not be carried over into a new day's play.

(ii) If, in the case of a follow-on or forfeiture, a side fields for two consecutive innings, this restriction shall, subject to (i) above, continue as necessary into the second innings but shall not otherwise be carried over into a new innings.

(iii) The time lost for an unscheduled break in play shall be counted as time on the field for any fielder who comes on to the field at the resumption of play.


Just to elaborate a bit further, the LAWS of the game cannot be compromised unless altered as a bylaw in any such cricket Association. The basic rules of the game of cricket are the basis for which we play under each week unless stated otherwise. Two captains CANNOT make alternative 'agreements' that make a mockery of or bring the laws of cricket into disrepute, otherwise all manner of chaos could reign. Eg; One hand one bounce; automatic wicky; can't get out of the first ball, etc, etc..

So I don't know what modified law or rule Tommy Kennison reckons he was playing under recently, but Div 1 matches aren't governed by those Mickey Mouse rules..

[Rubbish Binny]

Re: Para District Cricket Association 2009-10
catchit wrote:
SS Minnow wrote:
catchit wrote:
speaking to a good mate today and it seems a player is playing under a false name in the churches league... former PDCA player who is a tosser... not going to drop the club but be very carefull when doing that s**t, thats if they know his real name which iam sure they would...
oz you remember that day at your oval when this certain player lost his cool and i told him to f**k off??

Paralowie got done last week for a player playing under a false name. They were going to win but the game got called off. This player in question is playing in the Grand Final. They rolled the other team for 90odd and they are 5 for 33.


so they got done and paul is still playing??

Correct I beleive. Paul is playing B grade. Its a joke. Like Paralowie dont know who he is.

For an interesting read this is what was on the PDCA site. Surely they are not that stupid to do it two games in a row. I’m guessing it is up to association to do something about this again. Perhaps they could ask to see everyone’s drives license to see who is who in the wild zoo.

[Rubbish Binny]

Whats the divvy 5 scores?[/quote]


Enfield Made 205. Para Vista 1 for 8. Sgould be a tight game.[/quote]

come on Enfield.. i want Aces money lol [/quote]
Phantom, i don't think you realise just how much influence Ace will have over whether you get his money or not...[/quote]

[Mythbuster]

Just to clarify this particular law of the game (ie; not a bylaw or C&CCA match rule) that just so happened to occur yesterday during the Div 1 GF ;

Law 2, Subsection 5. Fielder absent or leaving the field

If a fielder fails to take the field with his side at the start of the match or at any later time, or leaves the field during a session of play,

(a) the umpire shall be informed of the reason for his absence.

(b) he shall not thereafter come on to the field during a session of play without the consent of the umpire. See 6 below. The umpire shall give such consent as soon as is practicable.

(c) if he is absent for 15 minutes or longer, he shall not be permitted to bowl thereafter, subject to (i), (ii) or (iii) below, until he has been on the field for at least that length of playing time for which he was absent.


For the record, (i), (ii) and (iii) are irrelevant in this case, but are as follows ;

(i) Absence or penalty for time absent shall not be carried over into a new day's play.

(ii) If, in the case of a follow-on or forfeiture, a side fields for two consecutive innings, this restriction shall, subject to (i) above, continue as necessary into the second innings but shall not otherwise be carried over into a new innings.

(iii) The time lost for an unscheduled break in play shall be counted as time on the field for any fielder who comes on to the field at the resumption of play.


Just to elaborate a bit further, the LAWS of the game cannot be compromised unless altered as a bylaw in any such cricket Association. The basic rules of the game of cricket are the basis for which we play under each week unless stated otherwise. Two captains CANNOT make alternative 'agreements' that make a mockery of or bring the laws of cricket into disrepute, otherwise all manner of chaos could reign. Eg; One hand one bounce; automatic wicky; can't get out of the first ball, etc, etc..

So I don't know what modified law or rule Tommy Kennison reckons he was playing under recently, but Div 1 matches aren't governed by those Mickey Mouse rules..

Herder, surely your not suggesting that we humble local cricketers should adhere to the basic rules of cricket!! That is absurd. TK is a world renown scolar and gentleman and his word is more than enough for me. Maybe you should sit next to him and score this week and be schooled in the art of social interactions........

[Goat Herder]

I've got some of my own social interactions planned next weekend, which is a shame.. I think it revolves around me, Baldo, my deck chair & my esky.

Not suggesting that it was done intentionally either, by the way, I think there was just a bit of confusion around the ruling. No harm done.

[carey]

A-Grade Granny scores- Para Vista won the toss and batted, all out for 207. Were in trouble early, (3/20) before Marshall (55), Smith, Bevan and Goedecke (all 30-odd) rallied to help the Herders toward a competitive total. For the Roys, Giglio, Bacon and Bourke all amongst the wickets. Should be an exciting Day 2 next week.

for sure it will be peoples thoughts on what way this will go?

for mine vista need the big 2 lochiel and the great man himself in gigs (not that iv stuck my neck out in saying that!) but for mine the game lays on there shoulders and it wont be an easy task in what is sure to be a slowish deck and against some very handy bowlers.

in a tricky target to get i would nearly post vista just favs as there runs are on the board still a toss of the coin tho.

$$$ vista $1.85
roy boys $2.05

[Mythbuster]

I've got some of my own social interactions planned next weekend, which is a shame.. I think it revolves around me, Baldo, my deck chair & my esky.

Not suggesting that it was done intentionally either, by the way, I think there was just a bit of confusion around the ruling. No harm done.

I think everyone at the ground was in no doubt at all that it WAS done intentionally.....Some may even say it's just bad sportsmanship! That simple, the whole thing was a joke.

[auto]

I've got some of my own social interactions planned next weekend, which is a shame.. I think it revolves around me, Baldo, my deck chair & my esky.

Not suggesting that it was done intentionally either, by the way, I think there was just a bit of confusion around the ruling. No harm done.

I think everyone at the ground was in no doubt at all that it WAS done intentionally.....Some may even say it's just bad sportsmanship! That simple, the whole thing was a joke.

Your just plain wrong mate....theirs no way Giggs would cheat....if he knew the rule he would quite reasonably assume you lads would know the rule and would never have taken the chance of playing against the rules in a GF in front of everyone present....to suggest he intentionally played against the rules when you dont know the man is plucking at straws....Giggs plays the game hard and very competitively and that can rub some people up the wrong way but dont mistake that for lack of integrity....he would have more of that in his little finger than most in this comp.

[Matty Thomas]

I've got some of my own social interactions planned next weekend, which is a shame.. I think it revolves around me, Baldo, my deck chair & my esky.

Not suggesting that it was done intentionally either, by the way, I think there was just a bit of confusion around the ruling. No harm done.

I think everyone at the ground was in no doubt at all that it WAS done intentionally.....Some may even say it's just bad sportsmanship! That simple, the whole thing was a joke.

Your just plain wrong mate....theirs no way Giggs would cheat....if he knew the rule he would quite reasonably assume you lads would know the rule and would never have taken the chance of playing against the rules in a GF in front of everyone present....to suggest he intentionally played against the rules when you dont know the man is plucking at straws....Giggs plays the game hard and very competitively and that can rub some people up the wrong way but dont mistake that for lack of integrity....he would have more of that in his little finger than most in this comp.

I agree with you 100% on this Auto, Gigs plays it hard and has in your face style but certainly doesnt cheat, anyone who knows him knows this. The previous week Gigs was told by the umpire that it was perfectly OK to do exactly what he did on saturday so as captain surely he cant of expected the rules changed over the course of one week.
I can see from earlier post that the rule does indeed exist but this is for the umpires to inforce becuase they should have been aware of it not let the bowler get to the top of his mark and have the opposition skipper come trolling out, this just causes angst between the two playing groups
I suggest you stick your conspiracy theory's elsewhere.......consider this mythbusted !

[Magpies96]

Mythbuster how do you suggest this is bad sportsmanship? I could point out two other things on the day far worse, but hey Thats cricket.

Bring on Saturday, it's going to be a cracker.