SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

[Pag]

brahma got up by a couple last night, good hit out with salisbury having some big boys and a young team

Watched last nights trial, if thats anything like Salisburys "A" grade team they will be in for a long year, I know its only a trial but they didnt show a lot.

We will be fine mate, had four new blokes in key positions that will take a few games to get used to, as well as missing a couple of key midfielders who bring a lot of leadership. Not worried at all about the score last night, nobody even kept it. But well played to The Lodge, their pace will trouble a lot of sides in Div 5.

[Boosh]

North Haven update for those interested. We play Smithfield at Smithfield next Thursday night, not sure what their lights are like but should be good regardless, I think its just a 6 quarter game with the grades mixed, we then play Paringa the next week at Paringa, we beat them by 40 goals a couple years ago but its fair to say we had a different team back then.

Only major ins thus far are Davis, Olcorn and Burridge from Districts with main losses being Mattew Mooney to Wagga and Wanganeen to West Lakes, so pretty much the same team as last year, so quite young.

Been getting between 30 and 45 on the track

Will definitely be fielding a C Grade this season

Don't see many teams playing a trial against teams they are going to play in the season.What about steven burns from angle vale , heard is training out at north haven.

I don't think so, I haven't seen him

[unknown source]

brahma got up by a couple last night, good hit out with salisbury having some big boys and a young team

Watched last nights trial, if thats anything like Salisburys "A" grade team they will be in for a long year, I know its only a trial but they didnt show a lot.

We will be fine mate, had four new blokes in key positions that will take a few games to get used to, as well as missing a couple of key midfielders who bring a lot of leadership. Not worried at all about the score last night, nobody even kept it. But well played to The Lodge, their pace will trouble a lot of sides in Div 5.

i agree with you pag you guys will be fine, i know the outs you guys had they are handy players.. we also have guys out but will never know who is the better side

para hills always find something bad to say against another side

[Robran]

yeah with you pags thought it was a good contest and i think both sides would have come away getting something out of the hit out. imo i thought your back 6 struggled a bit and against good forwards could get found out. good to see schults back up forward for you guys will make a big difference up there. best of luck to you guys for the season and hope you can get out there soon and make a impact.

[unknown source]

[quote="Robran"]yeah with you pags thought it was a good contest and i think both sides would have come away getting something out of the hit out. imo i thought your back 6 struggled a bit and against good forwards could get found out. good to see schults back up forward for you guys will make a big difference up there. best of luck to you guys for the season and hope you can get out there soon and make a impact.

number 20?

[Demon Juke]

North Haven update for those interested. We play Smithfield at Smithfield next Thursday night, not sure what their lights are like but should be good regardless, I think its just a 6 quarter game with the grades mixed, we then play Paringa the next week at Paringa, we beat them by 40 goals a couple years ago but its fair to say we had a different team back then.

Only major ins thus far are Davis, Olcorn and Burridge from Districts with main losses being Mattew Mooney to Wagga and Wanganeen to West Lakes, so pretty much the same team as last year, so quite young.

Been getting between 30 and 45 on the track

Will definitely be fielding a C Grade this season

Don't see many teams playing a trial against teams they are going to play in the season.What about steven burns from angle vale , heard is training out at north haven.

I don't think so, I haven't seen him

He told me himself he was playing at North Haven, also plays cricket out there.Not the best of trainers but it could be 4 clubs in three years - houghton,hope valley,angle vale and maybe north haven!

[blackcat]

brahma got up by a couple last night, good hit out with salisbury having some big boys and a young team

Watched last nights trial, if thats anything like Salisburys "A" grade team they will be in for a long year, I know its only a trial but they didnt show a lot.

We will be fine mate, had four new blokes in key positions that will take a few games to get used to, as well as missing a couple of key midfielders who bring a lot of leadership. Not worried at all about the score last night, nobody even kept it. But well played to The Lodge, their pace will trouble a lot of sides in Div 5.

i agree with you pag you guys will be fine, i know the outs you guys had they are handy players.. we also have guys out but will never know who is the better side

para hills always find something bad to say against another side

Just an observation, as i stated "IF THATS ANYTHING LIKE SALISBURYS "A" GRADE" without knowing ins or outs.

[bazza1]

Yes I can confirm Burnsy has been training at North Haven

[One Eyed]

Was a trial wasnt it.???

[zedman]

Was a trial wasnt it.???

[One Eyed]

Just checking

[Howgdizhe]

happened to watch your game closely on friday unknown! it was salisburys first hit out but what id seen they could be in for a long year! big nath kennedy got calved up by a bloke thats never played the game before! you guys also had 8 A Grade players out! happen to be standing next to a few stalkers from elizabeth! they sound very cockey down ther! bring on round 3!

yeah with you pags thought it was a good contest and i think both sides would have come away getting something out of the hit out. imo i thought your back 6 struggled a bit and against good forwards could get found out. good to see schults back up forward for you guys will make a big difference up there. best of luck to you guys for the season and hope you can get out there soon and make a impact.

number 20?

[catchisthecry]

!

[Pag]

happened to watch your game closely on friday unknown! it was salisburys first hit out but what id seen they could be in for a long year! big nath kennedy got calved up by a bloke thats never played the game before! you guys also had 8 A Grade players out! happen to be standing next to a few stalkers from elizabeth! they sound very cockey down ther! bring on round 3!

yeah with you pags thought it was a good contest and i think both sides would have come away getting something out of the hit out. imo i thought your back 6 struggled a bit and against good forwards could get found out. good to see schults back up forward for you guys will make a big difference up there. best of luck to you guys for the season and hope you can get out there soon and make a impact.

Well I may as well start a Div 5 - 2011 thread and put us in the poll.

I'm pretty sure when we won a Div 4 GF in 2007 we lost to Elizabeth in a trial, who ended up not making the finals in Div 5. But hey, if you say it, trial game form must be a good way to gauge sides.

[The Bartman]

happened to watch your game closely on friday unknown! it was salisburys first hit out but what id seen they could be in for a long year! big nath kennedy got calved up by a bloke thats never played the game before! you guys also had 8 A Grade players out! happen to be standing next to a few stalkers from elizabeth! they sound very cockey down ther! bring on round 3!

yeah with you pags thought it was a good contest and i think both sides would have come away getting something out of the hit out. imo i thought your back 6 struggled a bit and against good forwards could get found out. good to see schults back up forward for you guys will make a big difference up there. best of luck to you guys for the season and hope you can get out there soon and make a impact.

Well I may as well start a Div 5 - 2011 thread and put us in the poll.

I'm pretty sure when we won a Div 4 GF in 2007 we lost to Elizabeth in a trial, who ended up not making the finals in Div 5. But hey, if you say it, trial game form must be a good way to gauge sides.

I wouldn't be judging any sides on trial form, especially in the first week of March!

[Howgdizhe]

are you saying pag you take nothing away to work with from a trial game? why would you play them then? can only qoute on what i seen!!

happened to watch your game closely on friday unknown! it was salisburys first hit out but what id seen they could be in for a long year! big nath kennedy got calved up by a bloke thats never played the game before! you guys also had 8 A Grade players out! happen to be standing next to a few stalkers from elizabeth! they sound very cockey down ther! bring on round 3!

yeah with you pags thought it was a good contest and i think both sides would have come away getting something out of the hit out. imo i thought your back 6 struggled a bit and against good forwards could get found out. good to see schults back up forward for you guys will make a big difference up there. best of luck to you guys for the season and hope you can get out there soon and make a impact.

Well I may as well start a Div 5 - 2011 thread and put us in the poll.

I'm pretty sure when we won a Div 4 GF in 2007 we lost to Elizabeth in a trial, who ended up not making the finals in Div 5. But hey, if you say it, trial game form must be a good way to gauge sides.

[Pag]

are you saying pag you take nothing away to work with from a trial game? why would you play them then? can only qoute on what i seen!!

happened to watch your game closely on friday unknown! it was salisburys first hit out but what id seen they could be in for a long year! big nath kennedy got calved up by a bloke thats never played the game before! you guys also had 8 A Grade players out! happen to be standing next to a few stalkers from elizabeth! they sound very cockey down ther! bring on round 3!

yeah with you pags thought it was a good contest and i think both sides would have come away getting something out of the hit out. imo i thought your back 6 struggled a bit and against good forwards could get found out. good to see schults back up forward for you guys will make a big difference up there. best of luck to you guys for the season and hope you can get out there soon and make a impact.

Well I may as well start a Div 5 - 2011 thread and put us in the poll.

I'm pretty sure when we won a Div 4 GF in 2007 we lost to Elizabeth in a trial, who ended up not making the finals in Div 5. But hey, if you say it, trial game form must be a good way to gauge sides.

We took plenty away from it, as I'm sure Brahma Lodge did. You were the one who said we were in for a long season after our first hit-out of any kind, not me.

[Howgdizhe]

quote me if im wrong pag, i dont think i said you were in for a long year i cleary stated from what i seen you could be! like i said can only go on what was displayed!! clearly get ya facts right before biting back and whinging in div 4 forum!

[Pag]

quote me if im wrong pag, i dont think i said you were in for a long year i cleary stated from what i seen you could be! like i said can only go on what was displayed!! clearly get ya facts right before biting back and whinging in div 4 forum!

That's exactly my point, 'what was displayed' was a first trial game without an internal, with blokes playing in different positions and other blokes not playing. You sound like you expected us to belt you, and when it was a close-ish game, it means we must be ordinary for the rest of the year. I think if we were peaking in March we'd be worried, we expected to be rusty and we were.

Brahma Lodge played well, we didn't, but regardless of what was 'displayed', the game will have no bearing on either side's season.

[woodublieve12]

quote me if im wrong pag, i dont think i said you were in for a long year i cleary stated from what i seen you could be! like i said can only go on what was displayed!! clearly get ya facts right before biting back and whinging in div 4 forum!

That's exactly my point, 'what was displayed' was a first trial game without an internal, with blokes playing in different positions and other blokes not playing. You sound like you expected us to belt you, and when it was a close-ish game, it means we must be ordinary for the rest of the year. I think if we were peaking in March we'd be worried, we expected to be rusty and we were.

Brahma Lodge played well, we didn't, but regardless of what was 'displayed', the game will have no bearing on either side's season.

that is awesome.. bring on round 1