by Mr Miraculous » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:31 pm
by auto » Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:38 am
bloodybouncer wrote:typewriter wrote:automaticwicky wrote:been reliably informed from "farmers union" Kennison that we applied for second week points only not an outright. not sure how that worx. maybe we shoulda shut up and said nothing.
And thanx Spinny, hope we go alright too.
this is probably very easy for me to say - 'cause I play for Para Vista (!!!) - but i reckon you guys should've said something no matter the outcome.
reading through these pages, it seems that the general behaviour - on and off the field - of a couple of the Paralowie sides this season has been pretty disappointing, and it needs to be brought to the attention of the exec.
for the record, i'll be rooting for Tommy and his boys in their match on saturday too.
Well here i go again on the rules.............the conspiracy against Fitzroy continues....sorry Goat man!!!
The only points AWARDED, as per the LADDER, were 6 second innings points to Fitzroy....for the second innings win, as paralowie left the game. No where does it say you get 12 points for an outright, and if that is the case, fitzroy should get 12 also.
HOWEVER, Paravista C have been awarded 12 match points, cos Paralowie won the 1st innings
( but lost them because of the A grade forfeit), plus 6 points for fitzies second innings win. The exec feel the need to give the first innings match points that were NOT AWARDED to paralowie, to Paravista C. According to the LADDER, Paralowie has ZERO points, the first innings points were NOT AWARDED, and therefore cannot be given to Paravista C. Paravista C are entitled to 10 points, 6 for the match points (from fitzies second innings win) and 4 incentive points, as per the rules.
Lets just say, the people on the exec have received an email from me on this matter, and should treat my letter quite seriously.
by Ecky » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:30 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:34 pm
Ecky wrote:The (hopefully) final draw for the semi-finals is now available on the website.
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:48 pm
by Neville » Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:49 am
by Goat Herder » Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:39 pm
by playon » Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:41 pm
by bloodybouncer » Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:53 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:18 pm
playon wrote:what about div 2 and the other divs then?
by auto » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:34 pm
by lefty007 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:41 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:My drunken self opinionated thoughts on divvy 1 finals...
Probably have to say one of the most tightly contested ever, including last season.. toss a coin, make your tip and you truly are a 50% chance of getting it right..
NEK deserve to walk into this series as raging hot favorites, form over the season has been exceptional and with the big guns - Gorski, Balding, Atkins, Mills and even Placucci firing i see it hard for sides to get close if they hit top gear.
Lets not forget NEK have won the div 1 flag before, had a slump before being runners up in div 2 (drawn game with heat), then going runner up last season back in the top flight. Could this be the season of the knights?
Para Vista:- Well seasoned veterans of the finals, perennial front runners and reigning premiers, form has been indifferent this season and has honestly flown under the radar for most of the season, just doing what is required to secure wins and position themselves for the battle for the flag.
I struggle to write off PV, with a side littered with talent and experience i strongly believe PV will be the side to beat still..
Fitzroy:- Whinge, moan, complain.. still they seem to continue to pop up at this time every season and must be given every chance and respect to the club how it continues to conduct itself and perform on and off the field.
Unfortunately i dont see it happening for the 'roys this season, seem out of their depth unless the great man Giglio can wind back the clock...
Adel Luth:- WOW!! one word for it is WOW!! Massive over achievers this season, have really exceeded expectations and predictions thanks largely to Borgas & Blight piling on runs and giving them every chance. Need the older heads to fire for them to be any chance but my feeling is they have run their race for the season.
by the_lord1987 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:03 pm
by Mr Miraculous » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:09 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:playon wrote:what about div 2 and the other divs then?
Rose Park will hardly raise a sweat sweeping aside AC blues, expect the usuals to fire, Reidy has been almost unstoppable this year with the bat & the old bowling combo of Zuliamis and Clarke should get the job done.
The Western XI vs Seaton game i think is the toss of a coin, will come down to which ever side has players step up and not rely on the usual performers. For WXI thats Eddie Graham & Vassallo and for Seaton Domanski & Sajotovic.
IMO Domanski has shown he has another level come finals, my tip is Seaton
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:41 am
by auto » Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:52 pm
by Pidge » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:07 pm
typewriter wrote:Para Vista A posted 205 against Adelaide Lutheran A. Marshall made 90 odd, Cossens 39. Ecky from Adelaide Lutheran will probably be able to fill us in on the pick of the bowlers.
Para Vista B posted 117 against Paralowie. Brenton Starke made 45 not out. We all know that the mob from Elizabeth East are a rowdy bunch, and they play some weird cricket too... Surridge bowled 24 overs straight to claim 6/51, Lubcke bowled 19 straight from the other end to finish with 2/51. If I wanted a trundle in that team, I would've been pretty ticked - but I suppose these blokes were always going to continue the shenanigans they've got up to all year season to the semi finals. Paralowie are 0/15 in reply thereabouts.
Funny thing happened in our game. I was scoring and I asked for a new bowler's name. Some Paralowie supporter from behind us (in full view of Glennis from the Association) said "McHale, the bowler is McHale!" At that moment, the Paralowie players on the field yelled out "Bowler's name is McGinley." Glennis noted that McHale is not allowed to play in any CUSA competition because he had been barred from Para Districts or something. The supporter - who was adamant at first that it was McHale - quickly back-tracked and said "Oh, yeah, that's McGinley" and left the ground soon after. McGinley (or McHale?!?!?!) didn't trouble us with the ball, so we don't care, but it did sound weird!
As for Para Vista C, Auto's given us the update on them vs Fitzroy, thanks mate. Shaping up to be an interesting game next week, but here's to a couple of grand final berths for Vi$ta again!
But, good luck to everyone next week.
by auto » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:49 pm
by auto » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:51 pm
by Pidge » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:20 pm
automaticwicky wrote:Yeah Pidge, 6 overs is heaps hey......The way i look at it is 65 overs in a day divided by 11 players = surprise surprise 6 overs per player.......i was only doing my bit mate!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |