Adelaide Suburban Cricket Association 2009-10

[wycbloods]

Our win against Sheidow was a very good all round effort with no real stand out performances.

Everyone who bowled did the job and we never really let Sheidow get a partnership going after the first drinks break.

Also thanks to TL for walking because the umpire wasn't giving you out.

[The sarge]

Probably every chance Bloods that Tight Lines picked up the 3 votes in a side that was comprehensively beaten.

[wycbloods]

Probably every chance Bloods that Tight Lines picked up the 3 votes in a side that was comprehensively beaten.

Would be a very good chance Sarge. With a highest score of 61 by Eckert and no one taking more than 4 wickets over two innings i would think his 6/69 would get him 3 votes.

[wycbloods]

Bennett having some sort of year.

845 runs @ 140

32 wickets @12.

No doubt the sheidow boys will be putting in some work to keep him for future years, just gotta get him into the section 1 where he would no doubt have a big impact.

Looks as though they will make the finals so he would have to be a chance to nudge 12-13 hundred runs and get close to 50 wickets.

[Real McCoy]

Bennett having some sort of year.

845 runs @ 140

32 wickets @12.

No doubt the sheidow boys will be putting in some work to keep him for future years, just gotta get him into the section 1 where he would no doubt have a big impact.

Looks as though they will make the finals so he would have to be a chance to nudge 12-13 hundred runs and get close to 50 wickets.

Also, who's this Giesler in sect 3, ( Sth Coasters )750 odd runs with about 5-6 tons to his name, anyone know about him ????

[DR TIMS]

Big call to say he would dominate section 1 because he is making runs in section 4 bloody big difference in the standards of cricket in those two leagues. For starters you wont get dropped 5 times everytime at bat like ive heard he has been every game in section 4

[Minotaur]

Big call to say he would dominate section 1 because he is making runs in section 4 bloody big difference in the standards of cricket in those two leagues. For starters you wont get dropped 5 times everytime at bat like ive heard he has been every game in section 4

The comment wasnt dominate, it was have a big impact. As to whether bloods meant that to be competition wide, or just for SPCC is up to him. But the guy has played B and C grade district cricket. I do not doubt he would be able to make runs in section 1! You laugh at being dropped 5 times, but it does happen in section 1 as well! Regardless of the competition he is playing in, and the number of times he may have been dropped, you still need to make the runs and i think 6 centuries in a row speaks for itself.

I only hope he does decide to stick around at SPCC next year. He is a quality player, and can also offer a lot to young kids coming through in being able to teach (in batting, bowling and fielding). If he does stick around, then I have no doubt he will be playing section 1 and also assisting other players in some capacity if he desires. If Josh decides to go back to district cricket, then he can leave in the knowledge that he has a home club to come back to that will welcome him back with open arms.

[wycbloods]

Big call to say he would dominate section 1 because he is making runs in section 4 bloody big difference in the standards of cricket in those two leagues. For starters you wont get dropped 5 times everytime at bat like ive heard he has been every game in section 4

yep i agree it would be a big call hence why i didn't say that .

There is a difference in standards no doubt but i am sure someone doing that well in section 4 would be able to have an impact at section 1 level for Sheidow Pk.

[The sarge]

I will say he would dominate section 1. He is a quality player who has done well at B grade district level.

[DR TIMS]

if he was that good of a club person and such a good player he would play section 1 and not just be a big fish in a small pond when he does make section 1 runs then talk him up but while he is just playing C grade all we should say is he is an awesome C grade player because thats where he is playing

[wycbloods]

if he was that good of a club person and such a good player he would play section 1 and not just be a big fish in a small pond when he does make section 1 runs then talk him up but while he is just playing C grade all we should say is he is an awesome C grade player because thats where he is playing

That is a decision Sheidow Pk need to make. If he is playing with mates, as has been suggested by JB and others, then it is the clubs decision to allow him to do so and they cease that when they see fit.

I don't think being a good club person has anything to do with what grade you play.

I would have to ask why he would want to play a standard of cricket that is obviously well below him, playing with mates is a fair answer but not a good enough reason by itself. Enjoyment has been mention by JB in the past and if he is enjoying playing with his mates then so be it but i would think his competitiveness would see him playing at a more suitable level of cricket next year, if not have as much of a go as you like .

[Rik E Boy]

I don't think being a good club person has anything to do with what grade you play.

Thank God!

regards,

REB

[wycbloods]

I don't think being a good club person has anything to do with what grade you play.

Thank God!

regards,

REB

In fact the best ones, quite often, come from the lower grades. You were just in the middle of both areas .

[wycbloods]

Two rounds to go who will put their hand up for 4th spot?

These are the teams who can still make 4th.

In order(morphy pk and coro result not on ladder as yet so a guess as to where they will fit in)

Coro Ramblers currently 4th
Coromandel
Morphy Pks
ICC Sharks
Sheidow Pk
Plympton

My tip to make it is the winner of the Morphy Pk's and Coro Ramblers game this week.

[Roseboy]

Two rounds to go who will put their hand up for 4th spot?

These are the teams who can still make 4th.

In order(morphy pk and coro result not on ladder as yet so a guess as to where they will fit in)

Coro Ramblers currently 4th
Coromandel
Morphy Pks
ICC Sharks
Sheidow Pk
Plympton

My tip to make it is the winner of the Morphy Pk's and Coro Ramblers game this week.

I honestly cannot believe we are still sitting 4th. I don't think we could have played worse since Christmas (no disrespect to the teams that have beaten us), but I really do think we're a much better side than we've shown recently. I guess like many teams this year, form isn't consistent and it's a killer.

Best news for us is that our destiny is still in our hands. We start playing some decent cricket, except for an outright by one of the other teams, we win both we're in the finals.

[Booney]

I don't think being a good club person has anything to do with what grade you play.

I do. Surely if you are a good club person you want what is best for your club and if that means you play in a side that perhaps you dont want to, but it benefits the club then who do you put first, you or the club?

[wycbloods]

I don't think being a good club person has anything to do with what grade you play.

I do. Surely if you are a good club person you want what is best for your club and if that means you play in a side that perhaps you dont want to, but it benefits the club then who do you put first, you or the club?

Not the point i was trying to make Booney. I was more getting at it isn't just talented cricketers that make good club people. I do agree about the rest of what you wrote it is a hard decision for many though.

[wycbloods]

Two rounds to go who will put their hand up for 4th spot?

These are the teams who can still make 4th.

In order(morphy pk and coro result not on ladder as yet so a guess as to where they will fit in)

Coro Ramblers currently 4th
Coromandel
Morphy Pks
ICC Sharks
Sheidow Pk
Plympton

My tip to make it is the winner of the Morphy Pk's and Coro Ramblers game this week.

I honestly cannot believe we are still sitting 4th. I don't think we could have played worse since Christmas (no disrespect to the teams that have beaten us), but I really do think we're a much better side than we've shown recently. I guess like many teams this year, form isn't consistent and it's a killer.

Best news for us is that our destiny is still in our hands. We start playing some decent cricket, except for an outright by one of the other teams, we win both we're in the finals.

You guys have been afforded more last chances than John Farnham has had last tours.

[The sarge]

if he was that good of a club person and such a good player he would play section 1 and not just be a big fish in a small pond when he does make section 1 runs then talk him up but while he is just playing C grade all we should say is he is an awesome C grade player because thats where he is playing

Yes but I am saying he would dominate section 1. He has made runs at B Grade district level and there is a big difference between B Grade district and section 1.

It is his choice where he wants to play. It is his first season at the club and he came to the club only because he was going to play in the section 4 side where his mate was captain. If he didn't do that he wouldn't be playing cricket at all and I would rather see him playing than not.

[woodublieve12]

does anyone know if keswick B grade beat Adelaide Indians outright?