I wonder what is the long term financial feasibility of the SANFL competition ?????

by gossipgirl » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:48 am
by Psyber » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:12 am
by devilsadvocate » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:16 am
Psyber wrote:I think the VFL's plan was always a false "AFL" run primarily for the benefit of the Melbourne clubs.
That's why buying into it was a mistake, and Port did us a disservice by forcing the issue.
Had it not happened we may have eventually achieved a true independent national league.
by SABRE » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:37 am
devilsadvocate wrote:Psyber wrote:I think the VFL's plan was always a false "AFL" run primarily for the benefit of the Melbourne clubs.
That's why buying into it was a mistake, and Port did us a disservice by forcing the issue.
Had it not happened we may have eventually achieved a true independent national league.
And expand into places like the Gold Coast and Western Sydney.........
by Dutchy » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:44 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Psyber wrote:How many SA footy clubs in the SANFL, or its predecessor associations, have died or merged since, say, 1878.Constance_Perm wrote: Im aware of all that mate, my point is more that a governing body should have some responsibility in helping the clubs ... And I don't mean just at the last minute or via large $ bailouts.
Is it all that unusual for these changes to occur in any sporting association?
You don't think we've progessed since those days? How has the AFL managed to keep Hawthorn, Sydney, Melbourne, Western Bulldogs, Geelong and the Kangaroo's in their competition after their struggles at one time or another in the past 10 years?
by Pseudo » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:53 am
pipers wrote:The other 8 SANFL clubs can go and get f**ked for their selfish and short-sighted vindictiveness.
by Pseudo » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:54 am
am Bays wrote:The sad thing is, it is the wrong Port Adelaide who will survive.
by on the rails » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:56 am
Dutchy wrote:...but bailing out clubs isnt the answer, otherwise all clubs will know they can take high risk strategies and have the knowledge that the SANFL will always help them if/when they get in trouble...
by stan » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:03 am
gossipgirl wrote:Unfortunately since 1991 the SANFL competition is becoming more and more irrelevant each year with very little media exposure these days (except for the current crisis). I suspect if the magpies do fold then the competition will have lost numerous supporters and followers as I cant see a magpies supporter following any other club. You have to wonder how many existing clubs in the SANFL will still be around in say 10 to 20 years. I do believe that the AFL's long term plan is for the AFL clubs CROWS and PORT licences to be no longer owned by the SANFL. Not sure if this can ever really happen but that would have a huge impact on revenues for the remaining SANFL clubs.
I wonder what is the long term financial feasibility of the SANFL competition ????? :shock:
by Booney » Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:06 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |