better to live on your feet than die on your knees

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby gossipgirl » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:48 am

Unfortunately since 1991 the SANFL competition is becoming more and more irrelevant each year with very little media exposure these days (except for the current crisis). I suspect if the magpies do fold then the competition will have lost numerous supporters and followers as I cant see a magpies supporter following any other club. You have to wonder how many existing clubs in the SANFL will still be around in say 10 to 20 years. I do believe that the AFL's long term plan is for the AFL clubs CROWS and PORT licences to be no longer owned by the SANFL. Not sure if this can ever really happen but that would have a huge impact on revenues for the remaining SANFL clubs.

I wonder what is the long term financial feasibility of the SANFL competition ????? :shock:
Adelaide Crows World champions 2017 - Crows 4.11 to Lions 4.5
gossipgirl
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Looking for all the Boats
Has liked: 1501 times
Been liked: 57 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby Psyber » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:12 am

I think the VFL's plan was always a false "AFL" run primarily for the benefit of the Melbourne clubs.
That's why buying into it was a mistake, and Port did us a disservice by forcing the issue.
Had it not happened we may have eventually achieved a true independent national league.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12245
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 403 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby devilsadvocate » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:16 am

Psyber wrote:I think the VFL's plan was always a false "AFL" run primarily for the benefit of the Melbourne clubs.
That's why buying into it was a mistake, and Port did us a disservice by forcing the issue.
Had it not happened we may have eventually achieved a true independent national league.


And expand into places like the Gold Coast and Western Sydney.........
User avatar
devilsadvocate
Coach
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby SABRE » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:37 am

devilsadvocate wrote:
Psyber wrote:I think the VFL's plan was always a false "AFL" run primarily for the benefit of the Melbourne clubs.
That's why buying into it was a mistake, and Port did us a disservice by forcing the issue.
Had it not happened we may have eventually achieved a true independent national league.

And expand into places like the Gold Coast and Western Sydney.........

No 'dev',
Brisbane and Sydney have their own long running local competitions, as does every state
and territory. If those idiots in Western Aust. hadn't caved in to the Vics and Port had shown
some backbone by being faithful to South Australia, we could have a REAL national competition
right now, with all clubs having the right to compete, instead of the current disaster.
:(
NFC 2021
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Beyond Redemption
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby Dutchy » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:44 am

Constance_Perm wrote:
Psyber wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote: Im aware of all that mate, my point is more that a governing body should have some responsibility in helping the clubs ... And I don't mean just at the last minute or via large $ bailouts.
How many SA footy clubs in the SANFL, or its predecessor associations, have died or merged since, say, 1878.
Is it all that unusual for these changes to occur in any sporting association?


You don't think we've progessed since those days? How has the AFL managed to keep Hawthorn, Sydney, Melbourne, Western Bulldogs, Geelong and the Kangaroo's in their competition after their struggles at one time or another in the past 10 years?


Issue being is the PAMFC have been throwing huge $$$ at recruits over the past few years which is retrospect was irresponsible and is part of the cause, maybe the SANFL should be auditing clubs books regularly to pick up early warning signs, but bailing out clubs isnt the answer, otherwise all clubs will know they can take high risk strategies and have the knowledge that the SANFL will always help them if/when they get in trouble...
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45967
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2580 times
Been liked: 4197 times

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby Pseudo » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:53 am

pipers wrote:The other 8 SANFL clubs can go and get f**ked for their selfish and short-sighted vindictiveness.

and you, sunshine, can stick your head even further up your own fundament, where you will be insulated from reality and can happily believe the illusion that Port is not to blame for any of this, that the SANFL owes Port, that Port is not dying because of its own mismanagement but because those nasty ol' SANFL clubs just want to sink the boot.

It is exactly your attitude which prevents your mob from picking itself up off the canvas - like every other club has done in the last 20 years.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12173
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1639 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby Pseudo » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:54 am

am Bays wrote:The sad thing is, it is the wrong Port Adelaide who will survive.

Funnily enough, I agree.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12173
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1639 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby on the rails » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:56 am

Dutchy wrote:...but bailing out clubs isnt the answer, otherwise all clubs will know they can take high risk strategies and have the knowledge that the SANFL will always help them if/when they get in trouble...


Spot on Dutchy - No way will it happen plus the fact the SANFL never bailed out West Torrens, Woodville, Sturt or North makes the fact that Port Adelaide are no different to any other SANFL club in terms of consideration for a bail out despite some of the absolute rubbish posted by some so called Port people on this forum and others such as the Power from Port about some god given right to survive!
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby stan » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:03 am

gossipgirl wrote:Unfortunately since 1991 the SANFL competition is becoming more and more irrelevant each year with very little media exposure these days (except for the current crisis). I suspect if the magpies do fold then the competition will have lost numerous supporters and followers as I cant see a magpies supporter following any other club. You have to wonder how many existing clubs in the SANFL will still be around in say 10 to 20 years. I do believe that the AFL's long term plan is for the AFL clubs CROWS and PORT licences to be no longer owned by the SANFL. Not sure if this can ever really happen but that would have a huge impact on revenues for the remaining SANFL clubs.

I wonder what is the long term financial feasibility of the SANFL competition ????? :shock:


Less people at games will mean less money will be spent by sponsors for marketing. Which makes sense because there is not point having signs around if there is not anyone around to see them.
This can in turn effect the ABC, and god help the SANFL if the ABC's commitment to the league stops. What can happen and what did happen with the NSL, now the A-League prior is games werent televised and hence thats makes gettings sponsors very difficult. And in these times sponsers are hard to get.
The issue with the ABC will be ratings, and will they get enough people watching on TV to warrent them including this as part of the programing? Time will tell, I suspect not in the long term which means less coverage as a whole, which is very bad.

In summary, the remaining clubs need to get there pokie venues settled, like most have, and look at expanding that side of there business.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15446
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1313 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: better to live on your feet than die on your knees

Postby Booney » Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:06 pm

PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60943
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8046 times
Been liked: 11722 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |