by Sojourner » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:20 am
by Barto » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:02 am
by TimmiesChin » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:07 am
by Booney » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:08 am
TimmiesChin wrote:Id say there are three votes of yes from Magpies, Country/Affiliated Leagues and Norwood, meaning they will need three more yesses.
No doubt North will be against v(they think they run the SANFL)... unsure of other clubs.
by on the rails » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:26 am
Barto wrote:I dont think the clubs want to be the executioner, so the answer is yes.
by Barto » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:28 am
on the rails wrote:Barto wrote:I dont think the clubs want to be the executioner, so the answer is yes.
Well your club is going to vote no.
by on the rails » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:33 am
Barto wrote:on the rails wrote:Barto wrote:I dont think the clubs want to be the executioner, so the answer is yes.
Well your club is going to vote no.
Are you 100% on that?
by Barto » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:07 pm
on the rails wrote:Barto wrote:on the rails wrote:Barto wrote:I dont think the clubs want to be the executioner, so the answer is yes.
Well your club is going to vote no.
Are you 100% on that?
Unless one of your board members is telling me porkies then I think I am?
by Bluedemon » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:13 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:16 pm
by Booney » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:19 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Couldn't the power make more money with the magpies not in existance?
by darley16 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:25 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:29 pm
by darley16 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:35 pm
by TimmiesChin » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:36 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:But there has been no threat to take any licenses away darley. That's just rucci fear mongering. It will work on some people.
by redandblack » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:47 pm
by nickname » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:55 pm
redandblack wrote:The licence threat is a nonsense and just fairly typical Rucci hyperbole.
by redandblack » Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:46 pm
nickname wrote:redandblack wrote:The licence threat is a nonsense and just fairly typical Rucci hyperbole.
R&B, when is the hyperbole on? I know it was the superbole today.
by DOC » Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:35 pm
darley16 wrote:Sleeping, i am no fan of the Rucci but the point has been made clear by the AFL on this matter, Rucci not rumour mongering on this particular issue.
by DOC » Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:36 pm
TimmiesChin wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:But there has been no threat to take any licenses away darley. That's just rucci fear mongering. It will work on some people.
Yes there has been. Not sure if the threat has been raised with relation to this, but it was used recently ....... remember a recent announcement about playing AFL at Adelaide oval, and how the SANFL have mysteriously come to the table.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |