Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby whufc » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:34 am

The whole issue is not what the SANFL clubs are going to vote, it's more that the Power are only interested in the Magpies if it includes the Prince of Wales. The Power are just looking to rape the Magpies for their own benefit.

The merger is never going to get passed, if it gives the magpies an unfair advantage the SANFL clubs vote NO and if the Power get any kind of advantage the Crows are going to kick up a massive fuss (al la they will want a ressies side in SANFL) which will make the SANFL clubs er on the side of caution and vote NO.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28559
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5909 times
Been liked: 2823 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby topsywaldron » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:52 am

whufc wrote:The merger is never going to get passed, if it gives the magpies an unfair advantage the SANFL clubs vote NO and if the Power get any kind of advantage the Crows are going to kick up a massive fuss (al la they will want a ressies side in SANFL) which will make the SANFL clubs er on the side of caution and vote NO.


Even with today's mooted disaster of the AFL taking the two licenses away from the SANFL?

Funny how that one's popped it's head up now. :D

FWIW Rucci hates the Po'er, the Magpies are his team.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:58 am

topsywaldron wrote:
Even with today's mooted disaster of the AFL taking the two licenses away from the SANFL?

Funny how that one's popped it's head up now. :D

FWIW Rucci hates the Po'er, the Magpies are his team.


I thought that was interesting too. I'll call Rucci's bluff. Seeing as though the AFL have made no noise about this issue.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Wedgie » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:01 am

I think the only thing in the proposal's favour now is the fact North are so against it, that might be the only thing that sways some clubs! :lol:
I love Ruccis stuff, the bug bad Roosters will be responsible for the death of all footy in this state! :lol:
Stay tuned for tomorrows article when he let's us know how North were responsible for the holocaust, JFKs death and climate change. Wednesday will be a discussion about which part of Prospect is hiding the weapons of mass distruction we have aimed at Alberton! :lol:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby on the rails » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:02 am

The SANFL Commission was against the merer proposal from the start but so they can keep the blood of the magpies demise off their hands they deferred the decision to the SANFL Clubs to make and ultimately take the blame. It was the Commission ultimately and not the clubs that forced the Magpies into the comp when the Power were formed. Funny how back then the clubs had no say and the Commission was happy to make that call but now the Pies are a crippled basket case the Commission is hiding from any decision makin.

My mail is that once this merger stuff is buried once and for all the SANFL clubs as a striong united 8 will set about ensuring that the Commission actually works for the SANFL Comp and stops arse licking the AFL and trying to dilute the SANFL with salary cap and import restrictions. Expect some of the present Commission to have their snouts in the trough days ended and put sone people on there who actually have the interests of the SANFL at heart.
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Barto » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:05 am

Booney wrote:I know one thing for sure. If the Magpies find themselves in a position at the end of 2010 that the doors close, I will never set foot in the ground of one of the other 8 clubs again.

Not because they may or may not have signed the death certificate of the Magpies ( I know I know our nest etc etc ) but because the SANFL comp will mean nothing to me, nothing.

Could I pick another team to follow? No way.


I think this will be the case for several thousand other Magpie fans who attend games during the year.

Big night tomorrow night.


I can empathise with that, it's what I had decided if our doors shut for good at the end of 1995.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Booney » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:07 am

Wedgie wrote:I think the only thing in the proposal's favour now is the fact North are so against it, that might be the only thing that sways some clubs! :lol:
I love Ruccis stuff, the bug bad Roosters will be responsible for the death of all footy in this state! :lol:
Stay tuned for tomorrows article when he let's us know how North were responsible for the holocaust, JFKs death and climate change. Wednesday will be a discussion about which part of Prospect is hiding the weapons of mass distruction we have aimed at Alberton! :lol:


Holocaust,JFK,Global Warming are all well and good, but go about explaining the biggest and most evil creature ever created by the NAFC.

Image
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60943
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8046 times
Been liked: 11722 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Barto » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:09 am

Magpiespower wrote:
beenreal wrote: Not true, there was a period in the early 80's when Port couldn't afford to pay it's players and many of them walked. Not to mention the dispute with the council in the 70's which saw them move to Adelaide Oval.


Almost shut-up shop in '83 and '85.

Bucky Cunningham was one who walked.

Was only 30 when he retired on the eve of the '84 season...


I'm glad a Port supporter finally confirmed this, I've been howled down repeatedly on another forum for daring to suggest this happened. What amazes me is that a mere 5 years later they had a crack at entering a national competition. It's not surprising that the Power are struggling financially.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Barto » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:10 am

Booney wrote:
Wedgie wrote:I think the only thing in the proposal's favour now is the fact North are so against it, that might be the only thing that sways some clubs! :lol:
I love Ruccis stuff, the bug bad Roosters will be responsible for the death of all footy in this state! :lol:
Stay tuned for tomorrows article when he let's us know how North were responsible for the holocaust, JFKs death and climate change. Wednesday will be a discussion about which part of Prospect is hiding the weapons of mass distruction we have aimed at Alberton! :lol:


Holocaust,JFK,Global Warming are all well and good, but go about explaining the biggest and most evil creature ever created by the NAFC.

Image


There is no god.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Wedgie » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:11 am

Booney wrote:
Wedgie wrote:I think the only thing in the proposal's favour now is the fact North are so against it, that might be the only thing that sways some clubs! :lol:
I love Ruccis stuff, the bug bad Roosters will be responsible for the death of all footy in this state! :lol:
Stay tuned for tomorrows article when he let's us know how North were responsible for the holocaust, JFKs death and climate change. Wednesday will be a discussion about which part of Prospect is hiding the weapons of mass distruction we have aimed at Alberton! :lol:


Holocaust,JFK,Global Warming are all well and good, but go about explaining the biggest and most evil creature ever created by the NAFC.

Image


lmao, were trying!
First we shipped him off to Norwood and that didn't work so we shipped him off to Western Australia!
If that doesn't work well try Iraq or maybe Mars.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:14 am

Wedgie wrote:
Booney wrote:
Wedgie wrote:I think the only thing in the proposal's favour now is the fact North are so against it, that might be the only thing that sways some clubs! :lol:
I love Ruccis stuff, the bug bad Roosters will be responsible for the death of all footy in this state! :lol:
Stay tuned for tomorrows article when he let's us know how North were responsible for the holocaust, JFKs death and climate change. Wednesday will be a discussion about which part of Prospect is hiding the weapons of mass distruction we have aimed at Alberton! :lol:


Holocaust,JFK,Global Warming are all well and good, but go about explaining the biggest and most evil creature ever created by the NAFC.

Image


lmao, were trying!
First we shipped him off to Norwood and that didn't work so we shipped him off to Western Australia!
If that doesn't work well try Iraq or maybe Mars.


Back to his home planet hey.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby nickname » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:21 am

beenreal wrote:
And you would of course be referring to the candestine meeting held behind the back of the Magpies and the SANFL Commission? Because I thought only Port Adelaide did that sort of thing. :roll:


Clandestine? It was a meeting of the League Directors, in the presence of a member of the Commission, to discuss a notice of motion put by the PAMFC. Are you Michelangelo Rucci?
nickname
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Barto » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:24 am

Just read Rucci's latest "article". So how come the AFL are going to take the licences from the SANFL if they vote against one of their own clubs?

The Power will probably end up with the POW somehow as it is. The Power do not want the Magpies millstone, they want the pub, vote yes, call their bluff.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Harry the Horse » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:28 am

Is it World War I? Not since then has such propaganda found such prominence in the daily rag.
The Advertiser should be ashamed for publishing such unbalanced drivel from a Port fan, laced with scare tactics about the licences.
And from someone who enjoys taking pot shots at anyone who dares to have a so-called "conflict of interest"!
A new low for the Sadvertiser I'm afraid.
User avatar
Harry the Horse
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:13 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Pseudo » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:32 am

Barto wrote:Just read Rucci's latest "article". So how come the AFL are going to take the licences from the SANFL if they vote against one of their own clubs?

OK by me, so long as they return the license fees. With interest.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12173
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1639 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby topsywaldron » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:34 am

Harry the Horse wrote:Is it World War I? Not since then has such propaganda found such prominence in the daily rag.
The Advertiser should be ashamed for publishing such unbalanced drivel from a Port fan, laced with scare tactics about the licences.
And from someone who enjoys taking pot shots at anyone who dares to have a so-called "conflict of interest"!
A new low for the Sadvertiser I'm afraid.


They publish Andrew Bolt weekly, nothing's beyond them.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:37 am

We are seeing some great examples of Port diplomacy. Port only have themselves to blame if they fold.

The benefits outweigh the negatives.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby TimmiesChin » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:39 am

Pseudo wrote:OK by me, so long as they return the license fees. With interest.


They paid for their license fee themselves, and bring millions into the SANFL coffers each year. (even though they are losing money themselves)

They have nothing to pay back.
TimmiesChin
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:22 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby Wedgie » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:45 am

Surely Rucci wants the Magpies to die? He'd have to be completely dumb arse stupid if he thought his dribble would actually help the cause and I don't think it would be possible for anyone to be that stupid? Surely?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Proposed model for the Magpies - Power Joint Venture?

Postby redandblack » Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:57 am

And why on earth does he think the Magpies would abstain from voting on their own motion.

That's nonsense and it makes the rest of his conspiracy theories totally irrelevant.
redandblack
 

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |