by Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:42 am
by dedja » Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:52 am
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:18 pm
by beenreal » Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:50 pm
by Barto » Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:55 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jan 23, 2010 3:42 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by nickname » Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:59 pm
Wedgie wrote:We have a top 5 for 9 teams but would have a top 4 for 10 teams?
Im lost already.
by Psyber » Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:14 pm
But not the team for making choices that give Port an advantage.beenreal wrote: Point 3: I for one do not see the problem with the AFC continuing to distribute their players throughout the other 8 SANFL teams? After all, are they not the alleged "Team for all South Australians?"
by Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:50 pm
by Strawb » Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:51 pm
by Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:54 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:01 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:01 pm
by Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:02 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:48 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:01 pm
by beenreal » Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:39 pm
Apachebulldog wrote:That was my theory all along to introduce a Power and Crow reserves side into the comp to increase SANFL attendances.
by Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:19 pm
by Psyber » Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:30 am
I tend to agree there beenreal.beenreal wrote:For how long? As I said previously, the next generation of Crows supporters will barrack for the Crows in the SANFL as well.Apachebulldog wrote:That was my theory all along to introduce a Power and Crow reserves side into the comp to increase SANFL attendances.
by Apachebulldog » Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:29 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |