Moe wrote:bazza1 wrote:Moe, the only way the T20 will really take of is when the association take the concept seriously. The men in charge have all good intentions, but when you let the clubs take charge of when you play these games, its fraught with danger of the games becoming a farce. I agree with you Moe, the association need to program matches because being the sheep we are, we will do what we are told and then there wont be any problems.
I agree with you to a point Bazza, but up until this year i have never worried about what the Assoc. heirachy has done. Rather i have put all efforts into my own club and getting that structure right. Now that MPCC is running well i feel it is time for our club, which has been a minnow & underestimated in the ASCA for a long time, to stand up for what i/we believe is right. A few suggestions i will bring up now because i have the time & am sober
1. We need a 1 day comp badly for lower grades. Especially Divs 5-7.
2. We need our "Code of conduct" adhered to more stringedly, with players fined/suspended for bad behaviour & umpires not afraid to step in when needed more often. Our league is slowly denegrating in my opinion.
3. A medal for players who win a premiership. (Only a small thing, but bugger me, they cost $5 each)
4. A better selection criteria for Assoc. matches.
5. An effing better ron T20 comp.
6. Meeting once before & once after between every A grade captain & umpires to discuss problems. This means every club is represented.
7. Every club MUST have an A grade scorer. They are more important than umpires most times.
8. Some kind of prize money for winning a Premiership?
Only my thoughts.......

Following on with your extremely good points there moe, i'd like to throw this one in and see what you guys think...
In ASCA cricket what is the pinncale? a section 1 premiership of course, so therefore it should be the pinncale game of the season, and no other matches played while it is on.
I propose that the section one finals system be changed to a 3 week system, with 1v2, 3v4, winner of 1v2 into the final with a weeks break, and the loser getting a second chance to make the big one against the winner of 3v4. this actually gives the top 2 sides more of an advantage with a double chance, which i think is a fitting reward for being the top 2 sides at the end of the season.
sections 2-7 stay a 2 week system, so that the pinnacle game can be attended by all clubs accross the association.
The season need not go any longer, because you would introduce another 1 day game into the comp across all grades, most probably the first game after the break, which would be handy with a lot of people still away in xmas holidays etc you dont have to worry about super-subs.
This would in fact make section 2-7 one week shorter.
The argument against is that it would make a lot of cricket in a 3 week period, but in response to that it should be very hard to win a flag, especially i section one flag.