Port and West merge

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Port and West merge

Postby wobat head » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:44 pm

As someone who has followed the SANFL closely over the last 20 years and is a Magpies supporter the most logical answer is for Port and West to merge
I know that people will disagree but I would rather see Port Magpies merge and win some games then be in their present situation
Lets face it West and Port are sister clubs, West have a great facility at Richmond and could use an increase in membership
It would mean that Port Power can worry about what they need to worry about AFL and the SANFL would be reduced to 8 teams which would be a great result
I know that many will disagree with my opinion but personally I believe it is the most obvious, sensible and logically decision
The great thing about football is that individuals are passionate about it and consequently people will disagree for various reasons but lets face it The Port can not keep two teams afloat, I drove the Port the other day and its like a one horse town and the horse is as sick as a dog, there is not near enough money around the place to support both
Time to make tough decisions if this merge does not happen Port Magpies supporters will have to get use to competing with South for the wooden spoon and the Power will just have another distraction they do not need

GO THE WESTERN MAGPIES – they would be an instant Premiership chance and create a club that would be able to challenge Centrals as lets face it since the Magpies have suffered because of the Power all the other clubs have not had the strength, character or toughness and I could use a lot of other adjectives but would prefer not to use on this forum to stand up to Centrals, without the Magpies Centrals have had it to easy in this comp and such a merge has to happen as all other teams are soft
wobat head
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:35 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Thiele » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:57 pm

IT WONT HAPPEN
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: Port and West merge

Postby westcoastpanther » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:59 pm

worst thread ever
Hi, My name is Ron 'Bluey' Dunn. Did you know I played in the 61 & 62 Tasman Premiership sides....
User avatar
westcoastpanther
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5489
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Weipa
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 150 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Hondo » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:59 pm

Why drag West Adelaide into this problem?

We don't need a dilution of supporter bases right now IMO, especially the PAM people who would surely wash their hands of the SANFL before they'd support the Western Magpies.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:20 pm

An amazing post for a Port supporter.

Is there a push for this starting somewhere else? Trying to generate a bit of interest, see what the feeling is among Joe Public?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Dirko » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:22 pm

If Port can't survive on their own then they can piss off and die. Don't need another team of Hybrids.

Leave Westies alone. If Port got involved they'd **** up their BBQ.
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Psyber » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:47 pm

I suggested somewhat light-heartedly in other threads either a "Westport" solution or a merger with WWT to resurrect the Port Natives.
I can't see either of those clubs wanting to merge with the Magpies, though, without a desperate need on their part that we don't know about, or a substantial "sweetener" from the SANFL...
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Punk Rooster » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:56 pm

a merger is a good idea- allows the Williams family to attend any reunions that take place, without getting confused as to where they should go... ;)
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Port and West merge

Postby bayman » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:09 pm

wobat head wrote:I know that people will disagree but I would rather see Port Magpies merge and win some games then be in their present situation

without the Magpies Centrals have had it to easy in this comp and such a merge has to happen as all other teams are soft


i can't believe what i just read but these two clips of you post i have to reply to

1, yes you would rather see a merged team being more successful than being near the bottom etc etc, but i very much doubt if many port people feel the same way & surely it is just ports turn in the cycle to be in the bottom half of the table & instead of saying ''we're basically bottom & broke so lets merge'' why don't YOU DO THE HARD WORK & WORK YOUR WAY OUT OF IT AS CLUBS LIKE NORTH & STURT HAVE HAD TO DO FOR SURVIVAL

2, all other teams are soft :shock: but not as soft as you just giving up after 1 bad year & it is 1 bad year because the year before you played finals & the giving up (where is that creed ??) is bloody well softer than any team you care too mention


i texted my west mate terry he replied ''they can merge if they called the team west adelaide (port using the adelaide part of their name), wear black & red, play home at richmond & are called the bloods''

i think this poster is a troll
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Port and West merge

Postby spell_check » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:10 pm

SJABC wrote:If Port can't survive on their own then they can piss off and die. Don't need another team of Hybrids.

Leave Westies alone. If Port got involved they'd **** up their BBQ.


You'd love it. More excuses to pay them out.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: Port and West merge

Postby mal » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:22 pm

Wobat Head
Your post has some merits
But the past has brought up merger talks b4
Usually when clubs are near the bottom, and usually when they are financially strugglng
Was not that long ago ST were in strife with meger talk and when collecting a few spoons

I think its a cycle thing and that PA will come good again
At least PA have not completly disgraced themselves in recent years but are struggling

Someone or something will bail the club out
The real 1870 team will rise again
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30252
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2116 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: Port and West merge

Postby JK » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:44 pm

It's a pretty arrogant post actually, I wouldn't be too impressed if I were a Bloods supporter.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Mr66 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:09 pm

Er...how can I put this.. EFF NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

..there..
If one person does it, it's insanity. If millions do it, it's religion.

http://www.beyondblue.org.au
User avatar
Mr66
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4392
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:08 pm
Location: Where the Streets Have No Name
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Wedgie » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:05 pm

If you take the names of the teams out it does bring up some good points, if you discuss the teams then emotion's always going to come into it which makes it a difficult thing to discuss.
It'd be good to get a merger similar to the Wests Tigers in the NRL happening if you could bring successful elements from two different entities together.
For eg. one club with good resources, poor crowds, OK onfield performance, mediocre history and another with poor resources, great crowds and great history, or two middle of the road teams into a super club.
Might not be ideal candidates in the SANFL though.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Port and West merge

Postby beenreal » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:09 pm

Great, as if there aren't enough threads out there across a multitude of forums giving folks enough opportunity to bash the Magpies?
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Port and West merge

Postby am Bays » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:31 pm

Wedgie wrote:If you take the names of the teams out it does bring up some good points, if you discuss the teams then emotion's always going to come into it which makes it a difficult thing to discuss.
It'd be good to get a merger similar to the Wests Tigers in the NRL happening if you could bring successful elements from two different entities together.
For eg. one club with good resources, poor crowds, OK onfield performance, mediocre history and another with poor resources, great crowds and great history, or two middle of the road teams into a super club.
Might not be ideal candidates in the SANFL though.


Not the best example Wedgie, THE reason why I stopped following 'League as a Balmain supporter. Not the most fiancial club too despite the merger
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19787
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2132 times

Re: Port and West merge

Postby lachlan » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:42 pm

The SANFL want an 8 team competition. There will be no merger
lachlan
Member
 
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Barto » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:05 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:a merger is a good idea- allows the Williams family to attend any reunions that take place, without getting confused as to where they should go... ;)


Brilliant.

I doubt Westies want to take in some starving refugees anyway.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:06 pm

Wedgie wrote: Wests Tigers


Now there's an SANFL merger I'd like to see ;)
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Port and West merge

Postby Zathrus » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:08 pm

It won't happen, but the idea has merit. Westies would have the upper hand and would gain much because the Maggies are fightling for their survival. It would kill the Magpies/Power merger, and also give the SANFL an eight team comp without completely losing all the history of the most dominant club in SANFL history.

The way things look the other SANFL clubs and Adelaide won't allow a Port merger to also run a team in the SANFL for fear of possible on and off-field advantages they may gain. So the only other alternative is to just let them die completely, which even though I've hated the wharfies would be a disgrace.

Westies aren't going badly enough to consider it, but maybe should look at the pros and cons and look to the future 10 to 50 years down the track, not just the angst of the supporters today.

I can understand supporters hating the idea as I'd be the same with the Doggies. And look at the c&@p the Eagles supporters still get 20 years on.

But as I said, it won't happen.

I'm now going to pull my head in and go hide in the next room
Last edited by Zathrus on Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Zathrus
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:47 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 27 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

cron