by cripple » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:23 pm
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:26 pm
by NFC » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:29 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:My batting order for the 3rd Test: Its time for Ricky to bat down to prolong his career and put the responsibility of batting at 3 on a younger head, hence:
Katich
Klinger
Watson
Hussey
Ponting
Clarke
Haddin
Johnson
Hauritz
Siddle
Douglas
Hughes looked ordinary again today and played at far too many wide deliveries with rash shots that a quality opener wouldnt. North, well how many chances do you give him? Too hit or miss for me!
Get on Maxie Klinger![]()
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:30 pm
NFC wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:My batting order for the 3rd Test: Its time for Ricky to bat down to prolong his career and put the responsibility of batting at 3 on a younger head, hence:
Katich
Klinger
Watson
Hussey
Ponting
Clarke
Haddin
Johnson
Hauritz
Siddle
Douglas
Hughes looked ordinary again today and played at far too many wide deliveries with rash shots that a quality opener wouldnt. North, well how many chances do you give him? Too hit or miss for me!
Get on Maxie Klinger![]()
I'm starting to think people have forgotten or didn't watch him carve up South Africa. IT'S HIS NATURAL GAME.
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:32 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:33 pm
NFC wrote:As long as Hughes stays I'll he happy. He looked good after a nervous start, unlucky to be dimissed to a fluke catch by one of the worst fielders ever. He was really getting going. Please, please persist with him, he's a run machine.
In: Katich
Out: North
Simple.
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:34 pm
cripple wrote:bit of bother now
by Swamp Donkey » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:35 pm
NFC wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:My batting order for the 3rd Test: Its time for Ricky to bat down to prolong his career and put the responsibility of batting at 3 on a younger head, hence:
Katich
Klinger
Watson
Hussey
Ponting
Clarke
Haddin
Johnson
Hauritz
Siddle
Douglas
Hughes looked ordinary again today and played at far too many wide deliveries with rash shots that a quality opener wouldnt. North, well how many chances do you give him? Too hit or miss for me!
Get on Maxie Klinger![]()
I'm starting to think people have forgotten or didn't watch him carve up South Africa. IT'S HIS NATURAL GAME.
by Bum Crack » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:35 pm
by NFC » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:35 pm
Dutchy wrote:NFC wrote:As long as Hughes stays I'll he happy. He looked good after a nervous start, unlucky to be dimissed to a fluke catch by one of the worst fielders ever. He was really getting going. Please, please persist with him, he's a run machine.
In: Katich
Out: North
Simple.
So you want to get rid of North cause he aint making runs, but keep Hughes who isnt making runs?
by Interceptor » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:35 pm
by NFC » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:36 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:and thats fine if everyone else is making runs but he's unreliable.
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:37 pm
Bum Crack wrote:My $45.00 is looking ok.
by Dutchy » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:37 pm
NFC wrote:Dutchy wrote:NFC wrote:As long as Hughes stays I'll he happy. He looked good after a nervous start, unlucky to be dimissed to a fluke catch by one of the worst fielders ever. He was really getting going. Please, please persist with him, he's a run machine.
In: Katich
Out: North
Simple.
So you want to get rid of North cause he aint making runs, but keep Hughes who isnt making runs?
Ummm how old is Hughes? 20. How old is North? 30 odd.
But yeah, lets keep no improvement remaining North and keep sidelined a guy that in time will be a superstar of world cricket.![]()
Should be a selector.
by NFC » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:39 pm
Dutchy wrote:Age comes into it? when has that mattered in Aussie cricket?
Superstar? you seriously have to stop having your man crushes
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:43 pm
NFC wrote:Dutchy wrote:Age comes into it? when has that mattered in Aussie cricket?
Superstar? you seriously have to stop having your man crushes
Hughes has superstar potential. North has the potential to what, average 40?
You're right though, we'd prefer a team of guys who should be in the old folks home and don't perform over promoting some young talent.
An old guy failing vs a young guy failing. Give me the one with greater room for improvement any day.
by Bum Crack » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:48 pm
by RoosterMarty » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:49 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |