by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:02 am
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:43 am
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:02 am
locky801 wrote:Watson dropped at fine leg and it goes for 6
Australia 0/36
by RoosterMarty » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:05 am
by shoe boy » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:06 am
CoverKing wrote:locky801 wrote:Watson dropped at fine leg and it goes for 6
Australia 0/36
How well did he pick that pull shot up.
And as i type, he has just pulled a half volley for four over mid wicket!
Australia 0/46
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:08 am
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:09 am
shoe boy wrote:CoverKing wrote:locky801 wrote:Watson dropped at fine leg and it goes for 6
Australia 0/36
How well did he pick that pull shot up.
And as i type, he has just pulled a half volley for four over mid wicket!
Australia 0/46
How does one do that???
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:20 am
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:29 am
by RoosterMarty » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:30 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:I heard on day one that Hughes had extra pressure on him as he was only going to play the one test and be dropped regardless of how he went. I don't really understand this line of thinking, what if he scored ton's in both innings, are we so set in our ways that we can't accomodate for in-form batsmen?
Are batsmen earmarked too often for set places in the batting order? If Hughes was to save the game for us, wouldn't it be benficial to keep him in there and re-jig the line-up? Katich or Hughes to 3, Punter to 6 and North out?
Just a thought, I hear it too often when players get their chance that they are doomed no matter how they go.
by valleys07 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:33 am
RoosterMarty wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I heard on day one that Hughes had extra pressure on him as he was only going to play the one test and be dropped regardless of how he went. I don't really understand this line of thinking, what if he scored ton's in both innings, are we so set in our ways that we can't accomodate for in-form batsmen?
Are batsmen earmarked too often for set places in the batting order? If Hughes was to save the game for us, wouldn't it be benficial to keep him in there and re-jig the line-up? Katich or Hughes to 3, Punter to 6 and North out?
Just a thought, I hear it too often when players get their chance that they are doomed no matter how they go.
Good call that. If Hughes did play well then surely someone like North could drop out instead.
Watto dropped again? Is that 3 times now?
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:34 am
by locky801 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:41 am
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:43 am
by Swamp Donkey » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:44 am
CoverKing wrote:I personally would like to see Ponting move to 4/5/6 and hope that rejuvenates his career and prolongs it! We have to remember he is 35 now. His reflexes are not what they were.
North's out of touch at the moment but jeeze it would be harsh to drop him before Hussey after Hussey struggled for so so long and the selectors did nothing about it.
however Hughes has not made a ton in both innings! if he was to make a big hundred today, i would hope they keep him in tho!
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:49 am
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:53 am
by RoosterMarty » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:59 am
by JK » Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:07 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:11 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |