SA vs Victoria

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Battler » Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:02 pm

jackpot jim wrote:The blokes on here that r supporting the declaration have to remember that Victoria have ROMPED the run chase by a massive 20 overs.
That means that the declaration was far too generous OR that Manou has overestimated the quality of his bowling attack OR he hasn't and that they just bowled and fielded like SSHHIITT.
Anyway u look at it S.A. DOMINATED the game for 3 days and then simply hands the ascendancy back to Vic by the way of a miscalculated declaration.
For the S.A. attack to get wickets, they rely on the oppositons batsmen taking risks BUT when the Vics only have to score @3.3 rpo, they can just bat norMALly without taking risks and score at that rate confortably.
JJ I agree with you overall mate. I think other than George our bowlers are below par and needed some freedom by having another 100 runs to play with. I think we stuffed up by scoring only 109 runs in 28 overs or so when we knew what the declaration scenario was. A run rate of 6-8 per over for a 28 over period was achievable in SA s 2nd dig, particularly with wickets in hand. I will say it is good to have had an interest in this game at day 4 though. Such declaration agreements definitely have their place in the game and while Manou has done Ok in my opinion to date he was out-skippered in this one!
Battler
Member
 
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:06 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Keith

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby mal » Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:04 pm

mal wrote:SA 6/517 DEC
VI 6/246 DEC
SA 2/109 DEC
KLINGER 29* Thats the 3rd time this season we have declared on him, this guy needs to play in a 5 day test to get out !
COSI 44*

VI need 381 of about 100 0vers
We have absolutely creamed them, and can still get beaten
Bloody annoying



Made this comment b4 the innings started
And yes I am very very very very annoyed
This is a shattering defeat

GEORGE
HABERFIELD
DUVAL
CHRISTIAN
OBREIN

2 bowler attack
3 part time bowlers who bat
None have played for AU

VRS

JEWELL
ROGERS
HODGE
HUSSEY
MCDONALD
WHITE
WADE

7 batsman who have scored SS/PC tons
5 of them have represented AU
WADE might play for AU as well
Against a team which habitually makes a plethora of runs against us


I only posted once during the innings to congratulate cuzzin HODGEY for making his milestone
I was pissed off at this almost gift chase
Make the opposition score at 4 per over not just over 3 is a declaration

Merry Xmas to the Vics
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29762
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1982 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby The Cadet » Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:08 pm

jackpot jim wrote:JOKE of a declaration. :oops:
Very smart of the Victorians to win the toss and send S.A. into bat in a rain affected match knowing that they would receive a gift of a declation to set the game up.
381 off 113 overs @ 3.37 rpo.
Vics are going to CRUISE it in with 20 overs to spare. :roll:

When was the last time S.A. won a game after declaring and setting a target?

Redbacks will NEVER be any good until they get a captain thats got some idea about cricket.
FFS, this bloke thinks he can bat at 6. :shock:


To be good as a captain you have to be attacking thats what Manou did this game by declaring and try and give his bowlers as much of a chance as victory as possible. You wont get to the sheild final trying to just get first innings points all the time. 381 is a big chase on a last day wicket, dosnt matter how flat the track is. Vics have the best batting lineup in the comp and proved that today in style. SA's bowlers are inexperienced maybe the should of played Bailey if the wicket was so flat, would of been handy today.
User avatar
The Cadet
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 10:08 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby bloods08 » Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:16 pm

The Cadet wrote:
jackpot jim wrote:JOKE of a declaration. :oops:
Very smart of the Victorians to win the toss and send S.A. into bat in a rain affected match knowing that they would receive a gift of a declation to set the game up.
381 off 113 overs @ 3.37 rpo.
Vics are going to CRUISE it in with 20 overs to spare. :roll:

When was the last time S.A. won a game after declaring and setting a target?

Redbacks will NEVER be any good until they get a captain thats got some idea about cricket.
FFS, this bloke thinks he can bat at 6. :shock:


To be good as a captain you have to be attacking thats what Manou did this game by declaring and try and give his bowlers as much of a chance as victory as possible. You wont get to the sheild final trying to just get first innings points all the time. 381 is a big chase on a last day wicket, dosnt matter how flat the track is. Vics have the best batting lineup in the comp and proved that today in style. SA's bowlers are inexperienced maybe the should of played Bailey if the wicket was so flat, would of been handy today.


Wouldn't have made much of a difference....... Tait on the other hand.
Go you Redbacks!
User avatar
bloods08
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4817
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: right here
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 13 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby catchisthecry » Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:31 pm

Vics one of the best TEAMS of all time! Phenomonal record over the last few years. sensational belief. I think it all leads back to their unbelievable chase in Newcastle I think. When they chased down 500+ under Hookesy
catchisthecry
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:07 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:07 pm

The Cadet wrote:You wont get to the sheild final trying to just get first innings points all the time.


And you certainly won't get there if you are prepared to hand 6 points over to your opponent each time either.

Sometimes getting 2 points to 0 in a match is a good result, and Victoria in Melbourne is one such occasion.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:11 pm

catchisthecry wrote:Vics one of the best TEAMS of all time! Phenomonal record over the last few years. sensational belief. I think it all leads back to their unbelievable chase in Newcastle I think. When they chased down 500+ under Hookesy


They've won 1 Sheffield Shield in a row. A bit of work to be done before they match New South Wales 9 shields in a row from 1953-54 to 1961-62. :)
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby mal » Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:28 pm

Im still gutted and I didnt play
Imagine the players
We have outplayed the opposition for 3 days and LOSE

SA 8/626 combined innings
And lose by 6 wickets
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29762
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1982 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby CoverKing » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:43 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
The Cadet wrote:You wont get to the sheild final trying to just get first innings points all the time.


And you certainly won't get there if you are prepared to hand 6 points over to your opponent each time either.

Sometimes getting 2 points to 0 in a match is a good result, and Victoria in Melbourne is one such occasion.


Not each time, however handing it over to VIC is not so bad. They are a sure thing of finishing top IMO. Therefore each side is playing for 2nd spot. We had already got the 2 points. We needed the time to bowl there star studded batting line up out. The problem IMO was our 2nd innings batting rate. Too slow!

Fact is, we should be happy with 2 points against the VICS. That is 2 points we would not have expected at seasons start. 2 points more then most sides will get against them for the entire year!
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby welly » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:53 am

Manou must take a bit of flack for this, but who is his adviser???? The coach and how much first class cricket he played?????
welly
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:55 am

mal wrote:Im still gutted and I didnt play
Imagine the players
We have outplayed the opposition for 3 days and LOSE

SA 8/626 combined innings
And lose by 6 wickets


Exactly Mal. The trouble is trying to explain to the one day cricket generation that sometimes a draw is a good result. Yesterday was a disaster for SA cricket and set that team back 2 years. They'll be useless for the rest of the season now.

I'm past caring to he honest, I've seen them do this way too many times over the past years and we just never learn. Putting all your faith in a pedestrain medium fast attack and making a leg spinner 12th man doesn't help my mood either.

Sack Manou, not a good enough cricketer, certainly not a captain.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby locky801 » Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:12 am

I'm peevd off with the result as well and the declaration, thought we should have shown more aggression in that 2nd innings and set the Vics 420, probably they still may have got it, looking at that batting lineup it would probably score over 400 against the current Australian attack ;)
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 58653
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4390 times
Been liked: 1419 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Hondo » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:04 am

It will eventually be our turn to benefit from a manufactured result like that and I'll take that win with the same reality as I take this loss. It's about chasing the 6 points and manufacturing a 50-50 game out of a game that one team has dominated on paper.

I'm disappointed to lose but not gutted. Just the same, I bet the Victorian players aren't buying into the headlines of "amazing win". They played in a game where 2 sporting declarations set up a run chase after they had been outplayed in the first innings and, in the normal course, a draw was the likely result.

I reckon the SA lads will be equally realistic about it and so should we. I don't think they'll be in a daze for the rest of the season because of it. They'll know they had control of the game when it counted and should take the positives from it. AH is right in that sometimes not letting the opponent get 6 points is a good idea. But v Victoria in Melbourne if there's any chance to grab 6 points then I reckon you go for it. If we had got 6 points v Vic when everyone else loses to them then we would have been very well placed.

Draws are an honourable result but you won't get you into the final batting your way to 2 points per game. It's not necessarially right but that's the current points system. Maybe it could be an extra 2 first innings points when you've clearly done your part in setting up a 6 point scenario out of a game you had dominated on the 1st innings.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Not Scared » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:13 am

In my opinion we did declare too early, and it was an error in judgement from Manou. He certainly had to make it tougher for the Vics. Another 50 runs would have made all the difference, but if it had then ended up a draw, would everyone be on here saying we declared too late? Probably yes I reckon.

I also have to say though, that I don't agree with this whole the Vics will finish top and we are playing for second anyway school of thought. Now it is probably correct but before we gave them those 6 points we had to give ourselves a chance of finishing top. When was the last time a team won the Shield from second spot?
Don't be scared. Now is not the time!
User avatar
Not Scared
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby the joker » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:16 am

come on guys give choc a break, he made a game of it and they batted to well, what would you be saying if he left the Declaration to late and we just missed out on the 4 points. victoria were always going to host the final the other teams are just playing to be in it
I love vegatarian food. It goes great with steak.
User avatar
the joker
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4687
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:32 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:Vics one of the best TEAMS of all time! Phenomonal record over the last few years. sensational belief. I think it all leads back to their unbelievable chase in Newcastle I think. When they chased down 500+ under Hookesy


They've won 1 Sheffield Shield in a row. A bit of work to be done before they match New South Wales 9 shields in a row from 1953-54 to 1961-62. :)


Thank you very much. I thought the exact same thing but didn't bother replying. At one stage the NSW team had about eight current test players and a couple of former test players as well. The best team of all time in Shield terms would have to be in earlier eras at a time when International cricket was not being played on an annual basis in Australia and the domestic scene was the main course and not just an appertiser.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1761 times
Been liked: 1874 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:35 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote: The trouble is trying to explain to the one day cricket generation that sometimes a draw is a good result. Yesterday was a disaster for SA cricket and set that team back 2 years. They'll be useless for the rest of the season now.



Don't know about this one Hawk. More credit should go to Victoria in this thread IMO.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1761 times
Been liked: 1874 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby MAY-Z » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:57 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:Im still gutted and I didnt play
Imagine the players
We have outplayed the opposition for 3 days and LOSE

SA 8/626 combined innings
And lose by 6 wickets


Exactly Mal. The trouble is trying to explain to the one day cricket generation that sometimes a draw is a good result. Yesterday was a disaster for SA cricket and set that team back 2 years. They'll be useless for the rest of the season now.

I'm past caring to he honest, I've seen them do this way too many times over the past years and we just never learn. Putting all your faith in a pedestrain medium fast attack and making a leg spinner 12th man doesn't help my mood either.

Sack Manou, not a good enough cricketer, certainly not a captain.


absolute crap ah - who cares if we gave 6 points to victoria - they are not a threat to us in this competition they are always going to finish top- to try and finish 2nd it was worth giving them a run chase. taking 2 points from vic is better than what most teams will do.

main problem is our bowling has very little strike power - george is very good but he has little genuine support so we will always struggle to get outright results as we find it extremely difficult to bowl any side out twice
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby mal » Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:12 am

VI are a very good team
But they are vulnerable
They have currently run out of fast bowlers
Hodge will piss off soon
WHITE and possibly HUSSEY will be summoned to play shorter forms of cricket for AU

Last season unbeatable
This season have now become beatabale

But courtesy of a gift wrapped declaration by SA they have a good break on the other teams now
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29762
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1982 times

Re: SA vs Victoria

Postby redandblack » Mon Dec 14, 2009 12:02 pm

A declaration inviting the other team to make nearly 400 in the 4th innings, after having them 6/246 in the first, is hardly handing victory away.

Vic batted very well, that's cricket.

A declaration well worth making.
redandblack
 

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |