mackdaddy wrote:I've seen him a couple of times and he is nothing special. I think given time he may develop into a solid SANFL footballer but there is nothing about him to suggest he is AFL material. O'Hara from Centrals would have been a much better choice IMO.
And surely a team would pick Almond before Nason. Almond has it all over Nason in just about every category you could mention.
Haha Mr Fuller stop being so bias... get the blinkers off!!!
could easily say the same thing about kirkwood, who has been good at league level the last 2 years, played the last half of the season with pneumonia and still performed.
you cannot compare nason and allmond... completely different players, nason outside player, allmond gets in there a lot more!
nason is a quality player, has always had the potential and as far as i can remember was stiff not to play state u16s and only fell off the state radar through injury... but was still firm in the minds of recruiters
AFL recruiters are a lot more focused on outside players who use the play... becoz keeping the ball is everything!
Nason fits that model... allmond does not[/quote]
Actually Allmond is more of an outside player than an inside player. And actually I don't think Allmond is good enough to play AFL either. I just used him as a comparison as a better player. And just because Richmond drafted him doesn't make a better player. There are plenty of jokers running around in the AFL who would be very average SANFL players. AFL scouts get it wrong as many times as they get it right. Maybe even more so. I'd bet the house that players like O'Hara or Coad would make far better players then many current AFL players