Income Management Policy

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby Wedgie » Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:07 am

Gozu, I'm of Aboriginal descent ( my father was one of the stolen generation), what question did you exactly want to ask me?

If you're asking what I thought of the apology a while back from Rudd both my Dad and I thought it was a complete waste of time and it turns out we were right as nothing has happened since.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby Gingernuts » Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:21 pm

Another more comprehensive take on this issue:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/26/2753970.htm

There are some people in the Central Deserts region who would like to see income management extended to all of their cross-border region of the NT, South Australia, WA and Queensland.

They say large amounts of cannabis and other drugs are hurting communities despite all the Australian government monies going into new police stations and police housing under the COAG (Council of Australian Governments) national partnership.

Jenny Macklin has a tough road ahead.

Her spokeswoman says it is about changing the "culture of welfare dependence" for all Australians.

In the first instance, it is about the immediate problem of the poor living conditions of many Australian children.


As always with these issues, it's very easy to sit back and criticise ie the Greens in the earlier article. Suggesting a viable alternative proposal though?
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby mick » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:23 pm

Gingernuts wrote:Another more comprehensive take on this issue:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/26/2753970.htm

There are some people in the Central Deserts region who would like to see income management extended to all of their cross-border region of the NT, South Australia, WA and Queensland.

They say large amounts of cannabis and other drugs are hurting communities despite all the Australian government monies going into new police stations and police housing under the COAG (Council of Australian Governments) national partnership.

Jenny Macklin has a tough road ahead.

Her spokeswoman says it is about changing the "culture of welfare dependence" for all Australians.

In the first instance, it is about the immediate problem of the poor living conditions of many Australian children.


As always with these issues, it's very easy to sit back and criticise ie the Greens in the earlier article. Suggesting a viable alternative proposal though?


I don't have a problem with changing the culture of welfare dependence, so long as it is applied across the board to ALL Australians receiving welfare. I think Gozu is right a policy like this if enacted appeals very strongly to many on the conservative side of politics. The political divide is becoming blurred. In the future perhaps competance of government will ensure electoral success, rather than ideology or policy.
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:26 pm

So which party is moving across the spectrum or are both?
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14904
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 806 times
Been liked: 1237 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby mick » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:46 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:So which party is moving across the spectrum or are both?


I think the ALP is definitely moving to right, and will continue to do so under Rudd, if Turnbull survives I suspect the Liberal party may become more "liberal", but I think the cave dwellers will oust him before the end of 2010. However with arch conservative policies such as this one from Labor they will find it hard to differentiate themselves to the 15-20% who aren't rusted on either way. Maybe we'll se a resurgance in the minor parties in response to this, perhaps the Greens will attract people who see themselves as socialists?
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:55 pm

So, in the words of one of the posters on here, the Australian "Labor" Party is "becoming irrelevant" as it moves further and further to the right. Maybe we will end up with a Liberal Party and a Conservative Party.

Half the federal MPs are bourgeois lawyers anyway. Paul Keating is a good example of what the new Labor Party politician is. Only time he ever got his hands dirty was with french polish for his clocks

Actually, I've never understood why the name Liberal Party

"Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas"
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14904
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 806 times
Been liked: 1237 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby mick » Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:14 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:So, in the words of one of the posters on here, the Australian "Labor" Party is "becoming irrelevant" as it moves further and further to the right. Maybe we will end up with a Liberal Party and a Conservative Party.

Half the federal MPs are bourgeois lawyers anyway. Paul Keating is a good example of what the new Labor Party politician is. Only time he ever got his hands dirty was with french polish for his clocks

Actually, I've never understood why the name Liberal Party

"Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas"


I think it comes from the idea of Liberal capitalism as espoused by Bob Menzies. There certainly was diffentiation between parties in those days when the ALP was unashamedly socialist. Think the socialist plank in the ALP manifesto was quitely removed some years ago.
Last edited by mick on Thu Nov 26, 2009 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 3:42 pm

My father always said you need a regular changeover of government

Labor in power to fix the social issues / Liberals in power to fix the finances

A sharing of government allows a balance in the life of the country
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14904
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 806 times
Been liked: 1237 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby Gozu » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:12 pm

Wedgie wrote:Gozu, I'm of Aboriginal descent ( my father was one of the stolen generation), what question did you exactly want to ask me?

If you're asking what I thought of the apology a while back from Rudd both my Dad and I thought it was a complete waste of time and it turns out we were right as nothing has happened since.


Fair enough, Wedgie. But from my experiences I would say quite a few Aboriginal people were very happy with the apology.

For anyone that is interested there is a pretty lively discussion on the whole income management thing going on at LP:

http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/11/25/in-other-news/
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13775
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 674 times

Re: Income Management Policy

Postby Gozu » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:12 am

Excellent piece by Eva Cox on the government's plans to roll out income management nation wide:

"As the government has promised to reinstate the RDA, it has now proposed extending the process to non Indigenous communities, with high levels of disadvantaged residents. The proposal is to exempt veteran, age and disability pensions but target the less politically popular unemployed and sole parents, and allows those people that can prove their bona fides to ask for an exemption. It will start next year in the NT and then be extended to the rest of Australia."

http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/200 ... be-having/
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13775
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 674 times

Previous

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |