Rann - Poll

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Is Mike Rann Telling the truth when he says "I did not have sexual relations with her?"

Yes
16
31%
No
25
48%
Unsure
11
21%
 
Total votes : 52

Rann - Poll

Postby A Mum » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:43 pm

There's lots of tooing and froing re is Mike Rann innocent.
Be interested in a straight out Poll regarding this.

All debate etc is in the other thread viewtopic.php?f=20&t=25744&p=857490#p857490

But simple question - what do you believe or - what is your gut feeling from what you know thus far.
Is Mike Rann Telling the truth when he says "I did not have sexual relations with her?"

(And no, there is no 'I don't care option' you either think he is telling the truth or lying or you're not sure....lol
You get what you give....
User avatar
A Mum
Coach
 
 
Posts: 10111
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:32 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby bayman » Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:30 pm

i voted unsure because only 2 people know the truth, i find it hard to believe the golf course story though & i have a feeling that it could be a set-up......having said that IF it did happen it would be by two consenting adults so i can't see much of a problem anyway & lets face it this type of activity happens a lot
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Mickyj » Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:34 pm

If he did have sex with her what's the problem.He was single at the time she was the married shouldn't we be up in arms over a WOMAN being adulterous.
Hell we can't have a single politician having sex. but a married woman having an affair we can feel sorry for .Round the wrong way if its true .
And then her estranged husband wants an enquiry smells rotten to me or in other words a set up to end his political career.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby southee » Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:41 pm

Mickyj wrote:If he did have sex with her what's the problem.He was single at the time she was the married shouldn't we be up in arms over a WOMAN being adulterous.
Hell we can't have a single politician having sex. but a married woman having an affair we can feel sorry for .Round the wrong way if its true .
And then her estranged husband wants an enquiry smells rotten to me or in other words a set up to end his political career.


He was not single...he was engaged to Sasha....so that makes it ok then???? :roll:
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Mickyj » Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:26 pm

southee wrote:
Mickyj wrote:If he did have sex with her what's the problem.He was single at the time she was the married shouldn't we be up in arms over a WOMAN being adulterous.
Hell we can't have a single politician having sex. but a married woman having an affair we can feel sorry for .Round the wrong way if its true .
And then her estranged husband wants an enquiry smells rotten to me or in other words a set up to end his political career.


He was not single...he was engaged to Sasha....so that makes it ok then???? :roll:

And she is married so its ok for a married american or canadian women to commit adultery and then get paid for her story from a tv station and a magazine :roll:
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Lunchcutter » Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:20 pm

who'd want to root either one of 'em anyway :!:
RIP my DH 1964 - 2009 - You were one of the best and I miss you
User avatar
Lunchcutter
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby CoverKing » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:58 pm

Mickyj wrote:
southee wrote:
Mickyj wrote:If he did have sex with her what's the problem.He was single at the time she was the married shouldn't we be up in arms over a WOMAN being adulterous.
Hell we can't have a single politician having sex. but a married woman having an affair we can feel sorry for .Round the wrong way if its true .
And then her estranged husband wants an enquiry smells rotten to me or in other words a set up to end his political career.


He was not single...he was engaged to Sasha....so that makes it ok then???? :roll:

And she is married so its ok for a married american or canadian women to commit adultery and then get paid for her story from a tv station and a magazine :roll:


He was not engaged at the time. he was single!
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby mick » Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:16 am

Is Mike Rann sleeping in the spare room or on the couch at the moment? A good topic for another poll.
User avatar
mick
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
Location: On the banks of the Murray
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Psyber » Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:51 am

What really goes to the question of his ethics is not whether or not he had sex with the woman.
It is whether he conned his fiancee into making a call to her, ostensibly to invite her and her husband to a function, but in reality to help him create an alibi..
This is a much more serious allegation.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12245
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 403 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Bum Crack » Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:06 am

who cares :roll: :roll:
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7943
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 325 times
Been liked: 909 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby redandblack » Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:31 am

Psyber wrote:What really goes to the question of his ethics is not whether or not he had sex with the woman.
It is whether he conned his fiancee into making a call to her, ostensibly to invite her and her husband to a function, but in reality to help him create an alibi..
This is a much more serious allegation.


You're kidding, Psyber :roll:
redandblack
 

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby gossipgirl » Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:08 am

Bum Crack wrote:who cares :roll: :roll:


you are exactly right. Who really cares and what has it got to do with anything. I guess people just love gossip especially journos.
Adelaide Crows World champions 2017 - Crows 4.11 to Lions 4.5
gossipgirl
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Looking for all the Boats
Has liked: 1491 times
Been liked: 57 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Psyber » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:34 pm

redandblack wrote:
Psyber wrote:What really goes to the question of his ethics is not whether or not he had sex with the woman.
It is whether he conned his fiancee into making a call to her, ostensibly to invite her and her husband to a function, but in reality to help him create an alibi..
This is a much more serious allegation.
You're kidding, Psyber :roll:
No mate...
Manipulating your intended life partner is in my opinion more morally questionable than having sex [if he did] with an apparently willing partner.
I might forgive an infidelity in a partner in some circumstances, but I'd part with one who tried to con or manipulate me very fast.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12245
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 403 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby redandblack » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:41 pm

I don't necessarily disagree with that, but it's a personal matter, not a 'serious allegation'.

It's between him and his wife, no-one else.

If not, do we then become morality judges for all politicians (or anyone, for that matter).
redandblack
 

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby aceman » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:52 pm

I would not be surprised if there isn't an "outside influence" in this so I'll play Devil's advocate.

Maybe someone ( bikies perhaps they hate MR) has put up a considerable amount of money for the story to be spread, she gets the coin and disappears back to the US, noone over there knows the story and I'm not sure about the woman's ex-husband either, has a shifty look about him. May have had more than a finger in the pie.

Is this 'too far fetched' to be true?
Always behind the 8 ball
User avatar
aceman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5481
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: At home by the fire with Rupert at my feet.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Jimmy_041 » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:44 pm

Lunchcutter wrote:who'd want to root either one of 'em anyway :!:


=)) =)) =)) Eloquently put there LC - the moment deserves the phrase...

Especially her now, if Mike's been there......
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14904
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 806 times
Been liked: 1237 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby Psyber » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:12 pm

redandblack wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with that, but it's a personal matter, not a 'serious allegation'.
It's between him and his wife, no-one else.
If not, do we then become morality judges for all politicians (or anyone, for that matter).
I have no argument with that.
I've also said elsewhere that I am aware he could be telling the truth - false accusations do occur.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12245
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 403 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby wycbloods » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:13 am

Of the 34 who voted either No or Unsure, how many would change their vote now given what has happened in the last week or so?
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby aceman » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:25 am

wycbloods wrote:Of the 34 who voted either No or Unsure, how many would change their vote now given what has happened in the last week or so?




Money will entice a lot of weak people to say or do a lot of things. I still say it's "bikie driven" and I wouldn't trust the ex husband with a mangy dog!
mangy dog.jpg
mangy dog.jpg (2.14 KiB) Viewed 250 times
Always behind the 8 ball
User avatar
aceman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5481
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: At home by the fire with Rupert at my feet.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rann - Poll

Postby silicone skyline » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:31 am

aceman wrote:
wycbloods wrote:Of the 34 who voted either No or Unsure, how many would change their vote now given what has happened in the last week or so?




Money will entice a lot of weak people to say or do a lot of things. I still say it's "bikie driven" and I wouldn't trust the ex husband with a mangy dog!
mangy dog.jpg


Love the mangy dog picture. Lol
Ruthless and Relentless
User avatar
silicone skyline
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6329
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Amsterdam
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |