by Tight_Lines » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:19 am
by wycbloods » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:30 am
Tight_Lines wrote:Same story for Sheidow again this week had Keswick 5 for 89 as we have had each side 5 or 6 down for not many only to let a batsman or partnership take over. We bowled well again though they just had the depth Mackay came out at 6 and we dropped him on 0 tough chance to the keeper and twice again before 40 both 2 tough chances again also could of had another LBW shout turned down 2nd ball Ormsby faced which had to be close which could had made things alot different at 7 for 90.
But never happened and once Mackay got to 50 tho there was no where you could ball to him without it racing to the fence played some great shots. He smashed a cut shot that Peewee dropped and Broke his finger now where an opener and Leggy short for 6-8 weeks.
by Tight_Lines » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:35 am
wycbloods wrote:Tight_Lines wrote:Same story for Sheidow again this week had Keswick 5 for 89 as we have had each side 5 or 6 down for not many only to let a batsman or partnership take over. We bowled well again though they just had the depth Mackay came out at 6 and we dropped him on 0 tough chance to the keeper and twice again before 40 both 2 tough chances again also could of had another LBW shout turned down 2nd ball Ormsby faced which had to be close which could had made things alot different at 7 for 90.
But never happened and once Mackay got to 50 tho there was no where you could ball to him without it racing to the fence played some great shots. He smashed a cut shot that Peewee dropped and Broke his finger now where an opener and Leggy short for 6-8 weeks.
Heath is too good a player to give that many chances too. You guys seem to be a wicket away from rolling sides cheaply but haven't been able to do it on a couple of occasions.
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:40 am
by wycbloods » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:44 am
CoverKing wrote:And for all those sides that fielded the majority of the day on Saturday, dont worry you get some payback this week with the opposition having to field in 23 degreees![]()
by Roseboy » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:17 am
by jb » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:48 am
Roseboy wrote:I thought I'd follow up to my suggestion from last week that playing cricket in excessive heat should be disallowed on the basis of fairness and equal playing conditions.
So, I spent 5 mins and did some simple stats just to see...
The numbers below are based on both team's score, but only the first team's score if they got bowled out cheaply (sub 100). Reason being - team 2's score isn't what I consider proper data as their end-of-innings was cut short (usually declared or won the game), so it throws out the data.
Average score on the weekend: 237.67 runs
Average score for the previous round: 152.83 runs
Other interesting aspects to the round...
* a team that got beaten outright last round posts 280 this week
* another team that went incredibly close to being beaten outright makes 268
So draw your own conclusions.
PS Yes I know it's a very limited amount of data... not much I can do about that
PPS Yes if we'd made 352 I'd like to think I'd still bring this up
by Roseboy » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:44 pm
jb wrote:its all good in theory rb but how much cricket are you expecting to play with this rule i, wouldnt have thought you would get on much between now and march? weve lost ashes series on the toss of the coin so its just a bit of bad luck really...
by wycbloods » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:21 pm
Roseboy wrote:jb wrote:its all good in theory rb but how much cricket are you expecting to play with this rule i, wouldnt have thought you would get on much between now and march? weve lost ashes series on the toss of the coin so its just a bit of bad luck really...
As I pointed out in my previous post, there's only a probability of 1-2 days being called off per year even if the temperature limit was lowered to 35 going by the past 30 years of weather records. So if we stuck to 37 or so, there's less likelihood of even getting that many days called off.
I honestly don't think it'd effect how many days of cricket we play per year. From recent memory, we often lose 1 or 2 days prior to Christmas due to wet conditions. Probably won't happen this year though...
by Amateur Footy » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:36 pm
by Amateur Footy » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:39 pm
by Roseboy » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:51 pm
wycbloods wrote:Forecast for a "shower or two" this saturday. You guys might get lucky with the weather. Field in the nice warm weather and not have to bowl with a wet ball and slippery outfield. Good toss to lose some would say![]()
.
by wycbloods » Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:05 pm
Roseboy wrote:wycbloods wrote:Forecast for a "shower or two" this saturday. You guys might get lucky with the weather. Field in the nice warm weather and not have to bowl with a wet ball and slippery outfield. Good toss to lose some would say![]()
.
hehe, I'll pay that...
I didn't even get to have a crack at ya on the weekend Bloods, very disappointing. Only a couple of balls @ CK too.
by wycbloods » Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:12 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:Maybe with a bit of moisture in the wicket that brutal matting of yours will be a little less harsh on the cricket ball
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:54 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:Maybe with a bit of moisture in the wicket that brutal matting of yours will be a little less harsh on the cricket ball
by Roseboy » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:05 pm
wycbloods wrote:Roseboy wrote:wycbloods wrote:Forecast for a "shower or two" this saturday. You guys might get lucky with the weather. Field in the nice warm weather and not have to bowl with a wet ball and slippery outfield. Good toss to lose some would say![]()
.
hehe, I'll pay that...
I didn't even get to have a crack at ya on the weekend Bloods, very disappointing. Only a couple of balls @ CK too.
Yes that was a little disappointing, needed a hand to make a few more. On a serious note I thought you were the pick of the ramblers bowlers on the weekend.
by wycbloods » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:08 pm
Roseboy wrote:wycbloods wrote:Roseboy wrote:wycbloods wrote:Forecast for a "shower or two" this saturday. You guys might get lucky with the weather. Field in the nice warm weather and not have to bowl with a wet ball and slippery outfield. Good toss to lose some would say![]()
.
hehe, I'll pay that...
I didn't even get to have a crack at ya on the weekend Bloods, very disappointing. Only a couple of balls @ CK too.
Yes that was a little disappointing, needed a hand to make a few more. On a serious note I thought you were the pick of the ramblers bowlers on the weekend.
Cheers mate - the cheque's in the mail...
That 2nd ball we got from Russell was a shocker. No excuses, we bowled badly with it, but it was scuffed massively on one side and had a fair old chunk out of the other. Can't complain though, our first one was rooted. I think the ball hitting the roof, Marion road, fences etc probably didn't help it.
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:20 pm
by Amateur Footy » Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:29 pm
by CoverKing » Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:31 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:Doesn't matter which ball you use on the WYC wicket. Just don't use one you think is a jaffer![]()
43C tomorrow.....shame that wasn't saturday's forecast and we could escape with a draw. Still the rain forecast for saturday might make things tough for the fielding side.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |