Team's Of The 2000's

[The Cadet]

Cadet's Test and ODI Team's Of The 2000's
TEST

M.Hayden
G.Smith
R.Ponting
J.Kallis
S.Tendulkar
B.Lara
A.Gilchrist
S.Warne
B.Lee
M.Muralitharan
G.McGrath

12th M.Jayawardene

ODI

S.Tendulkar
A.Gilchrist
R.Ponting
M.Yousuf
J.Kallis
S.Ganguly
A.Symonds
S.Pollock
B.Lee
M.Muralitheran
G.McGrath

12th M.Nitini

[Lightning McQueen]

Are you a Brett Lee fan?

[Booney]

The Cadets "Top Band of all Time"

1 - Six and out

[MightyEagles]

He probably have Brett Lee song as the best of all time.

[Diddy]

He probably have Brett Lee song as the best of all time.

I hope you're not trying to insinuate that it isn't!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48eHkZfnGug

[Groover]

I'd probably have Jayasuriya in the ODI side for Yousuf

[Diddy]

I'd probably have Jayasuriya in the ODI side for Yousuf

Or move Bing up to bat 4, then you can add an extra bowler or all-rounder: maybe Shane Lee.

Pretty good stats from 01/01/2000 - 03/04/2001

Mat Runs HS Bat Av 100 Wkts BBI Bowl Av 5 Ct St
20 189 28 18.90 0 26 4/37 22.07 0 11 0

[bloods08]

I would probably put Langer in for Smith and swap Kallis and Lara in the batting order. But other than that, good effort.

[The Cadet]

Are you a Brett Lee fan?

Hate him

[Lightning McQueen]

Are you a Brett Lee fan?

Hate him

Sorry mate, everyones entitled to an opinion but I hardly think he has been one of the best eleven world-wide for the past decade, he couldn't even get into the Aussie eleven for ages.

[The Cadet]

Are you a Brett Lee fan?

Hate him

Sorry mate, everyones entitled to an opinion but I hardly think he has been one of the best eleven world-wide for the past decade, he couldn't even get into the Aussie eleven for ages.

Have look at his stats over the last 10 years in both forms

[GWW]

How would Lee's stats compare to Pollock's?

[Bob Loblaw]

How would Lee's stats compare to Pollock's?

ODI

Code: Select all

Player     Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI Ave  Econ  SR 4  5 
B Lee      186 182 1579.4 120 7456 324 5/22 23.01 4.71 29.2 11 9 
SM Pollock 220 215 1894.1 241 6872 275 5/20 24.98 3.62 41.3 8 3

Test

Code: Select all

Player     Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM     Ave  Econ SR  5 10
B Lee      75  148  2718.1 539 9476 303 5/30 9/171  31.27 3.48 53.8 9 0 
SM Pollock 70  135  2647.1 815 6439 260 6/30 10/147 24.76 2.43 61.0 6 1

Lee has him covered in ODI but you'd pick Pollock ahead of him for Tests

Only Murali has taken more wickets than Lee in the 2000's in ODI

[bloods08]

I would probably go for Lee over Pollock just for variety. McGrath and Pollock are the same sort of bowlers imo.

[Zorro]

Good effort, lucky it was only from 2000 onwards or you would've had to find room in the side for Scott Muller.

[Lightning McQueen]

I would probably go for Lee over Pollock just for variety. McGrath and Pollock are the same sort of bowlers imo.

You're more likely to get a fifty out of Pollock though. What about Freddy?

[CoverKing]

I would probably go for Lee over Pollock just for variety. McGrath and Pollock are the same sort of bowlers imo.

You're more likely to get a fifty out of Pollock though. What about Freddy?

Freddy haha kidding right??
He is massively overrated. Stats wise, he wouldnt make the best 3 sides.
only taken 4 5 wicket hauls in Test matches, and definitely not close to making a side as a batsman

[bloods08]

I would probably go for Lee over Pollock just for variety. McGrath and Pollock are the same sort of bowlers imo.

You're more likely to get a fifty out of Pollock though. What about Freddy?

Freddy haha kidding right??
He is massively overrated. Stats wise, he wouldnt make the best 3 sides.
only taken 4 5 wicket hauls in Test matches, and definitely not close to making a side as a batsman

Agree. Played a couple of good games in 2005 and everyone thinks hes a superstar.

[Lightning McQueen]

I would probably go for Lee over Pollock just for variety. McGrath and Pollock are the same sort of bowlers imo.

You're more likely to get a fifty out of Pollock though. What about Freddy?

Freddy haha kidding right??
He is massively overrated. Stats wise, he wouldnt make the best 3 sides.
only taken 4 5 wicket hauls in Test matches, and definitely not close to making a side as a batsman

I was just asking mate, stats don't always paint an accurate picture, I'd have Freddy in my side before Lee any day. Maybe he just lifts it a notch when playing the Aussies.

[bloods08]

I would probably go for Lee over Pollock just for variety. McGrath and Pollock are the same sort of bowlers imo.

You're more likely to get a fifty out of Pollock though.

Wouldnt get a bat most of the time.