by mal » Mon Oct 16, 2006 11:07 am
by MagicKiwi » Mon Oct 16, 2006 6:05 pm
by Brad » Mon Oct 16, 2006 6:07 pm
by Peter Falconia » Mon Oct 16, 2006 8:27 pm
mal wrote:The Baby Blues with 7 players unavailable aquitted themselves
extremely well and shows the much vaunted depth of that state.
If they had a full compliment[like 1st game last year] imagine this team.
KATICH
JAQUES
CLARKE
THORNLEY
OBREIN
HADDIN
HENRIQUES
LEE
BRACKEN
MACGILL
MCGRATH
CLARK 12th man !!!!
Emegencies
BOLLINGER
HAURITZ
CASSEN
What a starting XI all bar Haddin + Jaques can bowl.
And look at the 12 th man, this guy is burning in the test arena!
by Rik E Boy » Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:30 am
mal wrote:Im going to make a few of my usual controversial comments.
Number 1
HAURITZ costs NSW the game![]()
The turning point of this game was when HAURITZ took that sensational
catch at 3rd man to dismiss centurion ELLIOTT....allowing BORGAS to come
in and smash that excillerating 31 of 9 balls !
Bullshit. Take two wickets and a great catch and cost your team the match??? SA were the best team all day and Hauritz was one of the few bowlers who could hold their head high in a poor bowling performance.
Number 2
BORGAS man of the match![]()
All game every batsmen scored at about a run a ball from both sides.
ELLIOTs innings was a sheer gem to get so may runs so quickly.
BUT all was in vain until the BORGAS gem.
Nah. Borgas closed his eyes and jagged a few swipes on one of the smallest grounds in the contry with no real alternative and got the backs over the line. He didn't face the new ball, set the innings up and bat all the way through on one leg. Borgas was sensational for an over or two, Matty for many overs and a deserved man of the match IMO.
Number 3
NICHOLSON [32] BLEWETT[35] past thier use by datetoo early to tell
as both have the ability to improve immensely, but it was sad to see two
wonderful former Australian cricketers struggling today.
Maybe. Remember it is the first match of the season. You've played a lot of cricket mal. Would you write off an experienced cricketer after just one day match into the new season??
Number 4
Even though we did eventually win it only masked the error in not having
LEHMANN batting higher![]()
Agreed. But he got away with it.
What do the experts think
by mal » Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:42 am
by heater31 » Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:02 am
by am Bays » Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:02 am
mal wrote:Surprise surprise ELLIOTT and now MANOU are in doubt for the P/C game v NSW today
Ahh let me guess they played the o/d game before the 4 day game .......
by Maddogmike » Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:52 am
by Rik E Boy » Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:14 pm
by mal » Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:46 am
Rik E Boy wrote:I was the other way round Mally. I'd get runs in the first couple of matches and then get bugger all for the rest of the season LOL. Never used to make runs against Woodville either, I was Dave Mellis' bunny because I'd always try and smash him through legside. DOH.
regards,
REB
by Booney » Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:34 am
mal wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:I was the other way round Mally. I'd get runs in the first couple of matches and then get bugger all for the rest of the season LOL. Never used to make runs against Woodville either, I was Dave Mellis' bunny because I'd always try and smash him through legside. DOH.
regards,
REB
I was a matchwinner with the ball....for the opposition
by Rik E Boy » Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:27 am
by mal » Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:43 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Espeically if you can't chase 56 on a postage stamp![]()
regards,
REB
by Booney » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:18 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |