by & Pigs Fly » Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:36 am
by footy1992 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 am
by Ogilthorpe » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:21 am
by Bag The Points » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:56 am
by Rush a Point » Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:12 am
footy1992 wrote:i hear "football" was incorrectly spelt on the certificate of the u/16 leading goal kicker! Spelt "footabll"... deplorable
by Kart Horse » Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:35 am
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:01 am
by Bag The Points » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:13 am
Kart Horse wrote:does anyone know the u18, u16 & u14 winners?
by Down the Hill » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:46 am
by Bag The Points » Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:21 pm
The Lova wrote:Just a question to see if anyone knows how the champion club of the year is worked out???????
Reynella got the club of the year for 2009 for the overall success of every team in every grade at the end of the minor round
just a quick comparison (in which you would think the senior grades would be weighted slightly higher) but none the less here goes
................MVFC............Reynella
A grade........1 ..................4
B grade........1 .................6
C grade........1 ...............no team
U18s ...........5 ............... 4
U16s ...........2 ................ 5
U16 Sun.......6 ................ 3
U14s ...........6 ................. 2
U14 Sun.......6 ................ 5
7 teams from each side participated in finals.
Clearly morphett vale finished higher in most grades espicially senior.
Can anyone come up with a logical explanation or formula that explains this.
May sound like sour grapes but am just curious because I cannot work this out.
I guess it could be worse Port elliot could have won it apparently they play in the "SOUTHERN FOOTABLL LEAGUE" now.
Also a big congrats to Paul Hayford for his C grade medal.
by Bag The Points » Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:38 pm
by Axle Rose » Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:46 pm
Down the Hill wrote:The plus for the night was that after looking as though it would drag on for a while they actaully got through things quite well. Yes, there were a few minor blues with graphics and Craig Warman's butchering of certain names but I thought the SFL did OK. I didn't mind how they presented the votes for the minor grades but please leave them all on the screen for a while so they can be digested. On the goalkicking and team man trophies, what on earth happened there. On most trophies football was spelt either "footabll" or "footbal". At least the names were spelt correctly but if the engraver took care to get that right how can you get one of the easiest words in the English language wrong. Were they done by an Indian Call Centre ?
Anway, well done to big S$b. As stated earlier, his prepaartion for his clubs Elimination Final was far from perfect. I've heard a whisper there may have been some finals week financial issues between club and certain $$$$ players that caused a little unrest down at the Roo. Any comment Wheels and Deals.
by turning circle » Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:52 pm
by Bag The Points » Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:17 pm
turning circle wrote:is there anywhere you can get the entire vote list for both a and b grade???
and well done seb. he is huge!!!
by turning circle » Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:34 pm
by Slammer » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:26 pm
by Kart Horse » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:12 pm
Slammer wrote:Round 15 Cove v Lonsdale, Cove 24.19 def Lonsdale 11.7, 3 votes were awarded to a Lonsdale player in this match, now come on you can't be serious, these umpires cannot be taking this medal seriously if they were to adjudge a Lonsdale player best afield in a 15 goal drubbing. Lift your game men in white/yellow/orange/green. Simply not good enough
by Bag The Points » Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:24 pm
Kart Horse wrote:Slammer wrote:Round 15 Cove v Lonsdale, Cove 24.19 def Lonsdale 11.7, 3 votes were awarded to a Lonsdale player in this match, now come on you can't be serious, these umpires cannot be taking this medal seriously if they were to adjudge a Lonsdale player best afield in a 15 goal drubbing. Lift your game men in white/yellow/orange/green. Simply not good enough
best for Lonsdale that week were: K. MCINTYRE, S. MURPHY, B. KEMPSTER
and for Cove: D. REAVILL, A. BASIR, C. BEVAN. D Reavill kicked 7 goals. Which Lonsdale got the votes?
by White Line Fever » Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:39 pm
by Slammer » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:58 pm
Bag The Points wrote:Kart Horse wrote:Slammer wrote:Round 15 Cove v Lonsdale, Cove 24.19 def Lonsdale 11.7, 3 votes were awarded to a Lonsdale player in this match, now come on you can't be serious, these umpires cannot be taking this medal seriously if they were to adjudge a Lonsdale player best afield in a 15 goal drubbing. Lift your game men in white/yellow/orange/green. Simply not good enough
best for Lonsdale that week were: K. MCINTYRE, S. MURPHY, B. KEMPSTER
and for Cove: D. REAVILL, A. BASIR, C. BEVAN. D Reavill kicked 7 goals. Which Lonsdale got the votes?
If it was Kane McIntyre I can see how he could still be best on ground despite the scores. This crap about "losing team can't have the BOG" is total garbage. Sure, it would naturally follow that a whalloping like that would have BOG from winning side MOST TIMES, but a player from the losing side is not impossible. I'd suggest Blake Mosar from Hackham could have actually been the best man on the park at least once or twice this year, but his team around him were so far below the oppsition his great game still can't get them up. Your team could be playing so poorly no blinder by you can change the result or even get you closer.
Give the umps some credit for noticing it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |