devilsadvocate wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Can't believe anyone would dispute that as being a free kick.
I'm not disputing that it was a free kick, as to the letter of the law it was. But I just think that it was a bit soft in that part of the ground, at that point in the game.
I just think it's crap that a decision like that effectively decides the game.
You cant wing tackle a bloke and not let him go to the contest with only one arm, who is to say he wouldnt of marked it if he had both arms free?