
It is your standard, run of the mill BBQ, Same thing you get at every SANFL ground.
The best part about the Westies BBQ is ordering. So much fun seeing how confused the staff get with their "ticket" system.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:12 pm
by nickname » Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:09 am
by zipzap » Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:31 am
by Psyber » Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:41 am
by Booney » Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:52 am
Psyber wrote:When Port tried to join the VFL, and undermined SANFL independence, I thought they should be cast out and replaced by a team called Westport.
Perhaps it will finally happen...
by JK » Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:39 am
prowling panther wrote:well, the whispers are getting stronger, so my source tells me
and I cannot tell you his name
by oldfella » Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:51 am
by holden78 » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:47 pm
oldfella wrote:Why would not they amalgamate with the Eagles who are right next door?
by Psyber » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:14 pm
They called it the AFL, and wanted an SA team - any SA team - to support its appearance of legitimacy.Booney wrote:It was the AFL when Port tried to join.Psyber wrote:When Port tried to join the VFL, and undermined SANFL independence, I thought they should be cast out and replaced by a team called Westport.
Perhaps it will finally happen...
by southee » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:35 pm
zipzap wrote:Love the Westies BBQ - and the Ethelton lot will reap the benefits. On Sunday they had the option of sausages or sausages. In lieu of the stone cold pies I had sausages.
by bosvit » Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:43 pm
by beenreal » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:10 am
It was the AFL when Port tried to join.[/quote]They called it the AFL, and wanted an SA team - any SA team - to support its appearance of legitimacy.Psyber wrote:
by Psyber » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:47 am
I thought Norwood had already said "No" that's why they approached Port..beenreal wrote:That's right, ANY team, even a holier than thou Norwood, who didn't get to say yes quickly enough, beaten again by Port.Psyber wrote:They called it the AFL, and wanted an SA team - any SA team - to support its appearance of legitimacy.
I still reckon we should have thrown Port Adelaide out then, and hung out for a national league without far too many teams in Melbourne.
However, we are stuck with it now.
by MatteeG » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:52 am
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Zorro » Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:35 pm
by therisingblues » Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:47 pm
by Booney » Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:49 pm
by therisingblues » Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:07 pm
by beenreal » Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:19 pm
Psyber wrote:I thought Norwood had already said "No" that's why they approached Port..beenreal wrote:That's right, ANY team, even a holier than thou Norwood, who didn't get to say yes quickly enough, beaten again by Port.Psyber wrote:They called it the AFL, and wanted an SA team - any SA team - to support its appearance of legitimacy.
I still reckon we should have thrown Port Adelaide out then, and hung out for a national league without far too many teams in Melbourne.
However, we are stuck with it now.
by Wedgie » Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:52 pm
beenreal wrote:That would be a little difficult as both clubs were approached simultaneously.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |