RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby redandblack » Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:06 pm

I can't recall us ever losing by 56.5 points, or even 55.8 points, spelly 8) ;)
redandblack
 

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby am Bays » Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:15 pm

As a neural at the ground I didn't think the umpiring was that bad. Paid the obvious ones I thought missed a few but gee they didn't miss the frees like Sturt missed the target in the 2nd and 3rd quarters with some of their forward entries.

To be brutally honest I have at least seven turnovers to Sturt on their forward entries in those two quarters of which four of them were over Chambers head or too wide from minimal pressure. Chambers should be in 7th on the leading goalkickers list.

Chambers comment in the 3rd said it all really and given that it was loud and clear in the family area, under the 2002 interpretations a free kick should have been paid against him.... :lol: :lol:

Sturts forward pressure though was outstanding when Westies had it in their defence.

It's scary to think Sturt should have won by more.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19787
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2132 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby bluegirl2002 » Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:18 pm

Chambers comment in the 3rd said it all really and given that it was loud and clear in the family area, under the 2002 interpretations a free kick should have been paid against him[quote

Don't know about your home ground am Bays,but at Unley the family friendly area extends only to the outside of the boundary fence. Anything the arena side of the fence is the jurisdiction of players and officials. Perhaps the face-painter should hand out ear-plugs :roll:
Double Blue Blooded
bluegirl2002
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:05 pm
Location: Out in Front
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby am Bays » Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:25 pm

Doesn't worry me Blue-girl, I shared his frustration I thought his comment was apt. However I also know what the guidelines were issued to the umpires for the dummest free kick interpretation EVER in the history of this great game. I mean it is a mans game after all.

play on....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19787
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2132 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby bloods08 » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:43 pm

Oh well, back to the drawing board.
Go you Redbacks!
User avatar
bloods08
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4820
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: right here
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 14 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby Cambridge Clarrie » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:52 pm

Brilliant and sustained intensity by the boys today. They really finished West off with an extremely dominant display in the last qtr. Great performance by Coad (yet again). I was also very impressed with the work of Bratton who went at it 100mph...

West were very ordinary, as the scoreline suggests. The umpiring was a bit below par but I've seen a lot worse. Some West players need to learn that you can't hold on to the ball while making no attempt to dispose of it. Others think that simply dropping the ball qualifies as acceptable disposal... They seemed to be caught holding the ball quite a bit today...

Don't know what comment Chambers' is supposed to have made, but the boy certainly does suffer white line fever. He gives 100% every second he's on the ground. He has high expectations of himself and his team mates...
"They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head"
User avatar
Cambridge Clarrie
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Asleep in the Unley Oval pirate ship...
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby bayman » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:08 am

i thought sturt were actually a bit scrappy & was just doing enough from 1/4 time onwards despite the impressive margin of the match, west were at best absolutely woeful which added to the big blowout & it was good to see brendan fevola there supporting his good mate ben nelson & fev was happy for photos to be taken & autographs to be had by the crowd
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby nickname » Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:23 am

Sturt have better footballers than us, and several of them.
nickname
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby am Bays » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:40 am

Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Some West players need to learn that you can't hold on to the ball while making no attempt to dispose of it. Others think that simply dropping the ball qualifies as acceptable disposal... They seemed to be caught holding the ball quite a bit today...



Good observation CC, thought West players were holding on to it to find the better option - ball in hand so to speak and then give to a team-mate who is hopefully in support. Against teams like Sturt who work hard through the mid-field you just can't do that. Sturts midfield presure was very good I thought yesterday.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19787
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2132 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby whufc » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:44 am

Sturt= unley oval bullies
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28775
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby redandblack » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:47 am

I think it needs to be said that discussing West's form yesterday is a bit like judging Sturt on how they play against Glenelg. It's valid for yesterday, but doesn't give any indication as to how they've been playing over a period of time.

This year, West have beaten Centrals, beaten and drawn with the Eagles, run Glenelg to a few points and been highly competitive against all teams except Sturt. Our 3 worst losses have been against them and I naturally rate them highly.

The last time Sturt beat us at Waikerie, we beat Centrals next start.

I agree with amBays, Sturt's pressure and ball use was terrific and we're not the only team to not handle that. The other thing is that our tackle count was unusually low, which tells me we were well off our normal standard.
redandblack
 

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby bosvit » Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:34 pm

I couldn't get to this one (thankfully), but the guys on the radio were laughing at the umpiring and spent a lot of time talking about it. Sounded terrible both ways.

Obviously made no difference to the result.
Never argue with an idiot, those watching may not be able to tell the difference
User avatar
bosvit
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: Port Lincoln
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby zipzap » Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:35 pm

whufc wrote:Sturt= unley oval bullies


7 home wins + 6 away wins = stupid comment
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
User avatar
zipzap
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Bluebird Bakery
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby whufc » Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:03 pm

More to the point they absolutley smash teams on their home ground but aren't anywhere near as threating away from home generally.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28775
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby CUTTERMAN » Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:29 pm

whufc wrote:More to the point they absolutley smash teams on their home ground but aren't anywhere near as threating away from home generally.

I think the Eagles, Port, West, South and Norwood would all disagree to that whufc
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby whufc » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:16 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:
whufc wrote:More to the point they absolutley smash teams on their home ground but aren't anywhere near as threating away from home generally.

I think the Eagles, Port, West, South and Norwood would all disagree to that whufc


Norwood, Port, South irrelevant, West and Eagles both very up and down.

Sturt have been able to smash (and i mean smash) the good sides like Centrals at home but when facing them outside of Unley they have struggled to even get victories against these sides at other venues.

Against North at Unley Sturt were very competitive and only lossed by a couple of points while at Prospect they were belted by 80+ points.

Even South this year at home you smashed them by 80+ points and if i remember people posts they felt Sturt could have won by a lot more. Then down at Noarlunga you only just got past them by 9 points in a game which many thought South deserved to win.

Last year was the same against Central, beat them very very comfortably on 2 occasions at Unley, only to lose twice in a row against the Dogs outside of Unley.

Just an observation and i guess will know a bit more after this finals series.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28775
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby mal » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:16 pm

And Brendan Fevola was in the ST changerooms at 1/2 time
Geez the 2 great men Chambo and Fev in the same room

When was the last ime WA beat ST ?
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30252
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2116 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby Cambridge Clarrie » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:23 pm

whufc wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:
whufc wrote:More to the point they absolutley smash teams on their home ground but aren't anywhere near as threating away from home generally.

I think the Eagles, Port, West, South and Norwood would all disagree to that whufc


Norwood, Port, South irrelevant, West and Eagles both very up and down.

Sturt have been able to smash (and i mean smash) the good sides like Centrals at home but when facing them outside of Unley they have struggled to even get victories against these sides at other venues.

Against North at Unley Sturt were very competitive and only lossed by a couple of points while at Prospect they were belted by 80+ points.

Even South this year at home you smashed them by 80+ points and if i remember people posts they felt Sturt could have won by a lot more. Then down at Noarlunga you only just got past them by 9 points in a game which many thought South deserved to win.

Last year was the same against Central, beat them very very comfortably on 2 occasions at Unley, only to lose twice in a row against the Dogs outside of Unley.

Just an observation and i guess will know a bit more after this finals series.


Centrals efforts away from home have been no better than Sturt's this year. Sturt have, overall, played well away from Unley and exceedingly well at Unley.

Just my observations...
"They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head"
User avatar
Cambridge Clarrie
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Asleep in the Unley Oval pirate ship...
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby whufc » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:40 pm

Cambridge Clarrie wrote:
whufc wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:
whufc wrote:More to the point they absolutley smash teams on their home ground but aren't anywhere near as threating away from home generally.

I think the Eagles, Port, West, South and Norwood would all disagree to that whufc


Norwood, Port, South irrelevant, West and Eagles both very up and down.

Sturt have been able to smash (and i mean smash) the good sides like Centrals at home but when facing them outside of Unley they have struggled to even get victories against these sides at other venues.

Against North at Unley Sturt were very competitive and only lossed by a couple of points while at Prospect they were belted by 80+ points.

Even South this year at home you smashed them by 80+ points and if i remember people posts they felt Sturt could have won by a lot more. Then down at Noarlunga you only just got past them by 9 points in a game which many thought South deserved to win.

Last year was the same against Central, beat them very very comfortably on 2 occasions at Unley, only to lose twice in a row against the Dogs outside of Unley.

Just an observation and i guess will know a bit more after this finals series.


Centrals efforts away from home have been no better than Sturt's this year. Sturt have, overall, played well away from Unley and exceedingly well at Unley.

Just my observations...


Agree Centrals away efforts have been fairly ordinary this year, but we have a proven record in finals and have a great record at home which is very similar in size and shape to Aami Stadium. I don't think that it's just a coincidence that our Aami Stadium record since the afl's inception is very good
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28775
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: RD20 Sturt v West Post Match Review

Postby whufc » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:40 pm

Cambridge Clarrie wrote:
whufc wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:
whufc wrote:More to the point they absolutley smash teams on their home ground but aren't anywhere near as threating away from home generally.

I think the Eagles, Port, West, South and Norwood would all disagree to that whufc


Norwood, Port, South irrelevant, West and Eagles both very up and down.

Sturt have been able to smash (and i mean smash) the good sides like Centrals at home but when facing them outside of Unley they have struggled to even get victories against these sides at other venues.

Against North at Unley Sturt were very competitive and only lossed by a couple of points while at Prospect they were belted by 80+ points.

Even South this year at home you smashed them by 80+ points and if i remember people posts they felt Sturt could have won by a lot more. Then down at Noarlunga you only just got past them by 9 points in a game which many thought South deserved to win.

Last year was the same against Central, beat them very very comfortably on 2 occasions at Unley, only to lose twice in a row against the Dogs outside of Unley.

Just an observation and i guess will know a bit more after this finals series.


Centrals efforts away from home have been no better than Sturt's this year. Sturt have, overall, played well away from Unley and exceedingly well at Unley.

Just my observations...


Agree Centrals away efforts have been fairly ordinary this year, but we have a proven record in finals and have a great record at home which is very similar in size and shape to Aami Stadium. I don't think that it's just a coincidence that our Aami Stadium record since the afl's inception is very good.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28775
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |