Fair point ... let me clarify, and qualify that it's just a personal opinion and obviously the Eagles have determined the process so it's a tad academic.
I've made 2 assumptions which may well be incorrect.
1. The the agency in question does not have people on hand who have SANFL or AFL club experience in some form.
2. The first interview will be solely conducted by the agency with no football club appointed people involved (but who would obviously vet the shortlist).
It's OK for a recruitment agency to co-ordinate and oversee the process, but personaly I'd want to have football people on any interview panel, including the first (again I interpreted that it wasn't going to be the case so I could be mistaken).
The value of a very good recruiter is to (a) understand the requirements of the client, (b) understand the market and translating the client's requirements into action, and (c) manage the process professionally.
I don't see the agency performing well in (b) because it's such a specialised market and applicant target.
I have worked with recruiters at a senior level (on both sides of the equation) and the differentiator for me is almost always (b).
I agree that there should be a formal process to some extent, but with some flexibility. I'll give you an example where things can go wrong.
Cyril Rioli was picked up in the draft by Hawthorn when more than one other AFL club didn't consider him seriously because apparently he didn't interview well. The man's skills were unquestionable, but being able to handle an interview aren't skills that necessarily enhance his ability to be the player we all now know him to be.
It's almost as if there is that intangible quality that is very hard to define that you may not be able to accomodate with such a rigid process ...or a recruiter who doesn't have people who have been heavily involved in this sport at the required level who just won't understand.
And a final point, 3 interviews is an arduous process that some prospects may just think is not worth it, especially when they may have to take a significant pay cut if they were ultimately successful ... and what if (yes, I'm being slightly facetious) someone like Rick McGowan, Damien Hardwick, or an ex-AFL coach was interested? Would you really put them through 3 interviews?
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.