Blacky wrote:very short must be suffering from CRAFT
Haha! CRAFT, suffered from that a fair few times on a sundee morn!!!



by the tractor » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:33 pm
Blacky wrote:very short must be suffering from CRAFT
by CENTURION » Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:05 pm
by spell_check » Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:24 pm
CENTURION wrote:Don't get rid of it, re-invent it! Do what Daryl Hicks did at Centrals all those years ago! New song, new guernsey, corridor football, things aren't working the way they are at the moment & haven't been for ages, like Mr. T says, "Get some Nuts". Question. How old are the majority of members of the board? How old are the majority of the supporters?
by FEUNG » Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:47 pm
by bosvit » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:17 am
by bosvit » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:39 am
by darley16 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:18 pm
by panthers 2008 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:43 pm
by bosvit » Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:56 pm
by southee » Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:24 pm
by panthers 2008 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:46 pm
by pale ale » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:56 am
panthers 2008 wrote:Bosvit you make some good points 'but' playing blokes who clearly have no future in league football is a waste of everyones time!
There is no point being physically big enough yet totally incapable of making a presence!
Our reserves team is not much chop at the moment yet there are a few blokes who deserve a crack at league level and to be left there for a few weeks!
I can stomach young fellas having a dig and giving 100%,but to watch players who should not be part of our future dishing up rubbish is disheartening!
Coaching is a tough caper and the coaching staff will have to make some tough calls on certain players at seasons end!
Mass recruiting is a path the club do not want to go down and I commend them for that,but selective recruiting of at least four or five ready to go players is essential!
by bosvit » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:22 pm
pale ale wrote:panthers 2008 wrote:Bosvit you make some good points 'but' playing blokes who clearly have no future in league football is a waste of everyones time!
There is no point being physically big enough yet totally incapable of making a presence!
Our reserves team is not much chop at the moment yet there are a few blokes who deserve a crack at league level and to be left there for a few weeks!
I can stomach young fellas having a dig and giving 100%,but to watch players who should not be part of our future dishing up rubbish is disheartening!
Coaching is a tough caper and the coaching staff will have to make some tough calls on certain players at seasons end!
Mass recruiting is a path the club do not want to go down and I commend them for that,but selective recruiting of at least four or five ready to go players is essential!
Totally agree, Clay needs to stay on in 2010 recruit 4 to 5 quality recruits and stick with the younger ones and yes identify the 26 to 30 year old guys that arent up to league level and move them on...
by am Bays » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:49 pm
by southee » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:57 pm
am Bays wrote:I see South have announced another review of the football department following the loss to West on Saturday, ahhh excuse me but didn't Kevin Morris do that not two years ago. Will this new review uncover anything more than what Morris' review did? Will this review be made public???
by Lunchbox Legend » Wed Aug 05, 2009 7:56 pm
am Bays wrote:I see South have announced another review of the football department following the loss to West on Saturday, ahhh excuse me but didn't Kevin Morris do that not two years ago. Will this new review uncover anything more than what Morris' review did? Will this review be made public???
by darley16 » Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:18 am
by ball breaker » Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:07 am
MagareyLegend wrote:I stand by my comments.
To relate the debacle that is South Adelaide Football Club since 1964 to any lean periods my club has endured in its history is totally inappropriate.
In any case North Adelaide premiers 1900, 1902, 1905, 1920, 1930-31, 1949, 1952, 1960, 1971-72, 1987, 1991 (13 total) and Champions of Australia in 1972 versus South Adelaide 1877, 1885, 1892-93, 1895-96, 1898-99, 1935, 1938, 1964 (11 total) surely says it all.
by Sojourner » Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:50 pm
darley16 wrote:Lunchbox, Morris did complete his report and for once and all Cahill was not dismissed, presured, asked to leave etc, etc by the club, he got up and left for petulent reasons all of his own. The club went out of it's way to keep him, please no more misrepresentation re this topic (that includes you Sojourner).
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |