SANFL v SACA

All discussions to do with the SANFL

SANFL v SACA

Postby csbowes » Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:51 am

The SACA...

... am I the only one who will come out and say what total tossers they appear to be (once again, for like the millionth time).

Seriously, if the accusations being made by the AFL and SANFL are true, whereby the SACA is talking out of school, SACA members should be on the phone calling the board and giving them a good going over, god knows I'll be giving Brayshaw a serve about my teams coaching fiasco... but that's another story...

I've just never understood the SACA. A great stadium with a p*** poor product. They have one 1-dayer and 1 test and then a range of incredibly uninteresting cricket matches after that. I know, I know, some people like state cricket, but in the big picture of things, five men and a dog going to see the Redbacks isn't an endorsement of the product. From where I sit, the SACA should be pleading like crazy to get AFL football there, but there always seems to be an air of "arrogance cum expectation" on their part.

Do they not know humility down there?

I'm quite happy for someone to provide more facts to this than what the crappy commercial television stations and the local paper have said on this matter, but on the face of it, the SACA certainly appears to have acted poorly, improperly, wanker-like etc

Comments?
csbowes
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: Alma
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 77 times

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby dedja » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:04 am

Pretty much my thoughts as well ... I would have added the word irrelevant somewhere.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja … my yes be yes, my no be no
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24526
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 808 times
Been liked: 1721 times

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Wedgie » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:29 am

I'd add the term a joke. This latest unprofessional act may be a bonus for us SANFL fans ensuring we have to go there less.
And what's this crap I keep reading that the SACA want football to return there for the first time since 1973.
WTF have I been watching there for the last 30 years?
Morons.
Get a competent organisation to take over Adelaide Oval and I and footy might consider going back there.
They should have demolished the SACA instead of demolishing the bowling club there.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Barto » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:49 am

Wedgie wrote:And what's this crap I keep reading that the SACA want football to return there for the first time since 1973.


That's hilarious. Where was that written?
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Wedgie » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:59 am

Barto wrote:
Wedgie wrote:And what's this crap I keep reading that the SACA want football to return there for the first time since 1973.


That's hilarious. Where was that written?


Today's article alluded to it "more concessions to football if the SANFL is to return to Adelaide Oval for the first time since 1974" but at least 2 articles and quotes in the past have rerferred to "football" returning to the oval for the first time since 73 or 74.
Completely disrespectful and incorrect.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Barto » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:31 am

I didn't realise things were that bad in Adelaide that SANFL isn't even referred to as football let alone league football anymore. Flogs.

Perhaps a VFL team played there back then.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Pseudo » Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:56 am

Wedgie wrote:
Barto wrote:
Wedgie wrote:And what's this crap I keep reading that the SACA want football to return there for the first time since 1973.


That's hilarious. Where was that written?


Today's article alluded to it "more concessions to football if the SANFL is to return to Adelaide Oval for the first time since 1974" but at least 2 articles and quotes in the past have rerferred to "football" returning to the oval for the first time since 73 or 74.
Completely disrespectful and incorrect.


The "journalist" whose name I will not smear upon This August Forum wrote that "elite football" has not been played there in 40 years. It baffles me how anyone with that attitude could hold a "chief" position at the Advertiser.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12256
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Rucciangelo » Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:20 am

Pseudo wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Barto wrote:
Wedgie wrote:And what's this crap I keep reading that the SACA want football to return there for the first time since 1973.


That's hilarious. Where was that written?


Today's article alluded to it "more concessions to football if the SANFL is to return to Adelaide Oval for the first time since 1974" but at least 2 articles and quotes in the past have rerferred to "football" returning to the oval for the first time since 73 or 74.
Completely disrespectful and incorrect.


The "journalist" whose name I will not smear upon This August Forum wrote that "elite football" has not been played there in 40 years. It baffles me how anyone with that attitude could hold a "chief" position at the Advertiser.


It wasn't me! x_x ^#(^ :-B
Failure is only the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.
User avatar
Rucciangelo
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: Half Back Flank
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby doggies4eva » Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:20 pm

I'm confused. Are we sposed to be hating SACA or journalists? :?
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Wedgie » Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:40 pm

doggies4eva wrote:I'm confused. Are we sposed to be hating SACA or journalists? :?

Both! :twisted:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby Booney » Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:44 pm

Journalists, journalists who play footy, they're the worst.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61831
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8231 times
Been liked: 11966 times

Re: SANFL v SACA

Postby doggies4eva » Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:57 pm

Booney wrote:Journalists, journalists who play footy, they're the worst.


What about journalist who play cricket? :?
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time


Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |