Dr. Pink wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Not too many from Barossa there. Willaston wanna be's might be closer.
Care to explain? 3 ex willaston players makes HB, Willaston wannabe's???
by The reigning Ben.C » Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:27 pm
Dr. Pink wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Not too many from Barossa there. Willaston wanna be's might be closer.
by Mythical Creature » Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:33 pm
by Dr. Pink » Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:56 pm
The reigning Ben.C wrote:Dr. Pink wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Not too many from Barossa there. Willaston wanna be's might be closer.
Care to explain? 3 ex willaston players makes HB, Willaston wannabe's???
by BobbyNeil » Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:34 pm
Dr. Pink wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Not too many from Barossa there. Willaston wanna be's might be closer.
by BobbyNeil » Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:36 pm
The reigning Ben.C wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Barossa wanna be's? Care to explain?
by The Duke » Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:41 pm
norm11 wrote:The Duke wrote:norm11 wrote:Any coaching jobs up for grabs around the league at this early stage?
I think Sponge Nelson would slot in nicely in the APFL, if that is what you are asking.
are u back soon Duke?
by Kart Horse » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:19 pm
The Duke wrote:norm11 wrote:The Duke wrote:norm11 wrote:Any coaching jobs up for grabs around the league at this early stage?
I think Sponge Nelson would slot in nicely in the APFL, if that is what you are asking.
are u back soon Duke?
Fitness test tomorrow.
Hopefully the hammy hold up.
by UNDERthePACK » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:28 pm
BobbyNeil wrote:The reigning Ben.C wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Barossa wanna be's? Care to explain?
Hamley only ever seem to do alright when they kick the locals out and get ring ins in.
The latest bunch are wanna be's because although they are ring ins they are hopeless ones.
by Kart Horse » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:48 pm
UNDERthePACK wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:The reigning Ben.C wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Barossa wanna be's? Care to explain?
Hamley only ever seem to do alright when they kick the locals out and get ring ins in.
The latest bunch are wanna be's because although they are ring ins they are hopeless ones.
Hamley probably have gone alright when they have paid out good money for all the ring ins. Apart from the 3 willaston lads and 1 gawler central player the rest of the side are made up of local Hamley Bridge boys (or players that have been around the club for 4+ years). Unfortunately this year hasn't been great for the bombers but certainly gets a little confussing when we go alright we get criticised for spending the dollars and the last few years we have looked at devoloping the locals and not spending big money we are criticised for being s***t. Yep totally agree that the club should be more competative, no one is denying that fact but the club is a young group that have been given an opportunity at A-grade level and hopefully a good portion of the players such as the Luke Weddings, Stuey Gregory, Jed Eastwood and Angus Lemmans all become quality A-graders in years to come as all of them are under 20 plus probably another 6-7 in that age bracket. Get off Hamley's back unless you want to volunteer to come out and help out. It is extremely tough sitting behind a computer bagging the F**K out of players and clubs but have a little respect to everyone involved. I would like to see the football ability of half the bloggers on this sight. Would be very interesting to see their credentials compared to the comments they make. I don't get on here much but when I do its about football / APFL in general but certainly not about bagging anyone or any club. Yes its a forum but I know for a fact that a lot of people read this and get quite down on what is said. Seriously sometimes it gets a little personal and lets just remember what happened to the 16 year old geelong girl earlier in the week. Sometimes what issaid on this sort of forum isn't that much different
by BobbyNeil » Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:02 pm
UNDERthePACK wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:The reigning Ben.C wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Barossa wanna be's? Care to explain?
Hamley only ever seem to do alright when they kick the locals out and get ring ins in.
The latest bunch are wanna be's because although they are ring ins they are hopeless ones.
Hamley probably have gone alright when they have paid out good money for all the ring ins. Apart from the 3 willaston lads and 1 gawler central player the rest of the side are made up of local Hamley Bridge boys (or players that have been around the club for 4+ years). Unfortunately this year hasn't been great for the bombers but certainly gets a little confussing when we go alright we get criticised for spending the dollars and the last few years we have looked at devoloping the locals and not spending big money we are criticised for being s***t. Yep totally agree that the club should be more competative, no one is denying that fact but the club is a young group that have been given an opportunity at A-grade level and hopefully a good portion of the players such as the Luke Weddings, Stuey Gregory, Jed Eastwood and Angus Lemmans all become quality A-graders in years to come as all of them are under 20 plus probably another 6-7 in that age bracket. Get off Hamley's back unless you want to volunteer to come out and help out. It is extremely tough sitting behind a computer bagging the F**K out of players and clubs but have a little respect to everyone involved. I would like to see the football ability of half the bloggers on this sight. Would be very interesting to see their credentials compared to the comments they make. I don't get on here much but when I do its about football / APFL in general but certainly not about bagging anyone or any club. Yes its a forum but I know for a fact that a lot of people read this and get quite down on what is said. Seriously sometimes it gets a little personal and lets just remember what happened to the 16 year old geelong girl earlier in the week. Sometimes what issaid on this sort of forum isn't that much different
by Swamp Donkey » Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:24 pm
UNDERthePACK wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:The reigning Ben.C wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Barossa wanna be's? Care to explain?
Hamley only ever seem to do alright when they kick the locals out and get ring ins in.
The latest bunch are wanna be's because although they are ring ins they are hopeless ones.
Hamley probably have gone alright when they have paid out good money for all the ring ins. Apart from the 3 willaston lads and 1 gawler central player the rest of the side are made up of local Hamley Bridge boys (or players that have been around the club for 4+ years). Unfortunately this year hasn't been great for the bombers but certainly gets a little confussing when we go alright we get criticised for spending the dollars and the last few years we have looked at devoloping the locals and not spending big money we are criticised for being s***t. Yep totally agree that the club should be more competative, no one is denying that fact but the club is a young group that have been given an opportunity at A-grade level and hopefully a good portion of the players such as the Luke Weddings, Stuey Gregory, Jed Eastwood and Angus Lemmans all become quality A-graders in years to come as all of them are under 20 plus probably another 6-7 in that age bracket. Get off Hamley's back unless you want to volunteer to come out and help out. It is extremely tough sitting behind a computer bagging the F**K out of players and clubs but have a little respect to everyone involved. I would like to see the football ability of half the bloggers on this sight. Would be very interesting to see their credentials compared to the comments they make. I don't get on here much but when I do its about football / APFL in general but certainly not about bagging anyone or any club. Yes its a forum but I know for a fact that a lot of people read this and get quite down on what is said. Seriously sometimes it gets a little personal and lets just remember what happened to the 16 year old geelong girl earlier in the week. Sometimes what issaid on this sort of forum isn't that much different
by Footy Warrior » Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:46 am
Mythical Creature wrote:My tips for the week for what they are worth:
United over Two Wells by 5 goals - despite what Footy Warrior thinks
Mallala over Hamley by 20+ goals - Mallala to possibly rest some key players
Virginia over Balaklava by 6 goals - Balak in great form but would help us if Virginia wins
United to have the showers to themselves as Two Wells know better than to shower in their own changerooms.
by Bob Loblaw » Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:52 am
Bob Loblaw wrote:This week's tips:
Hamley vs Mallala. Mallala by 26 goals
Two Wells vs United. Two Wells by 2 goals
Virginia vs Balaklava. Virginia by 7 goals
by Mythical Creature » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:00 pm
UNDERthePACK wrote:Hamley probably have gone alright when they have paid out good money for all the ring ins. Apart from the 3 willaston lads and 1 gawler central player the rest of the side are made up of local Hamley Bridge boys (or players that have been around the club for 4+ years). Unfortunately this year hasn't been great for the bombers but certainly gets a little confussing when we go alright we get criticised for spending the dollars and the last few years we have looked at devoloping the locals and not spending big money we are criticised for being s***t. Yep totally agree that the club should be more competative, no one is denying that fact but the club is a young group that have been given an opportunity at A-grade level and hopefully a good portion of the players such as the Luke Weddings, Stuey Gregory, Jed Eastwood and Angus Lemmans all become quality A-graders in years to come as all of them are under 20 plus probably another 6-7 in that age bracket. Get off Hamley's back unless you want to volunteer to come out and help out. It is extremely tough sitting behind a computer bagging the F**K out of players and clubs but have a little respect to everyone involved. I would like to see the football ability of half the bloggers on this sight. Would be very interesting to see their credentials compared to the comments they make. I don't get on here much but when I do its about football / APFL in general but certainly not about bagging anyone or any club. Yes its a forum but I know for a fact that a lot of people read this and get quite down on what is said. Seriously sometimes it gets a little personal and lets just remember what happened to the 16 year old geelong girl earlier in the week. Sometimes what issaid on this sort of forum isn't that much different
by Bob Loblaw » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:06 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:I understand the point you are trying to make but that is a piss poor effort on your behalf saying this is similar to what happened in her case.
Like Donkey said whilst we may all occasionally bag Hamley as a club (name a club which hasn't been bagged by someone on here) its only the dickheads like BobbyNeil (AKA The Big Shrek) that individually bag anyone. I would suggest to the bloke getting down on himself when reading this to either not come here for a read or harden up a touch as this site is all a bit of fun!
by Mythical Creature » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:09 pm
Footy Warrior wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:My tips for the week for what they are worth:
United over Two Wells by 5 goals - despite what Footy Warrior thinks
Mallala over Hamley by 20+ goals - Mallala to possibly rest some key players
Virginia over Balaklava by 6 goals - Balak in great form but would help us if Virginia wins
United to have the showers to themselves as Two Wells know better than to shower in their own changerooms.
Got it right this time MC. Lee Almond and Wally Hand beat United by themselves. Almond hasn't had a history of polling well at Mail Medal Counts, but he'll give it a fair crack this year.
by Mythical Creature » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:10 pm
Bob Loblaw wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:I understand the point you are trying to make but that is a piss poor effort on your behalf saying this is similar to what happened in her case.
Like Donkey said whilst we may all occasionally bag Hamley as a club (name a club which hasn't been bagged by someone on here) its only the dickheads like BobbyNeil (AKA The Big Shrek) that individually bag anyone. I would suggest to the bloke getting down on himself when reading this to either not come here for a read or harden up a touch as this site is all a bit of fun!
by Bob Loblaw » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:11 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:Bob Loblaw wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:I understand the point you are trying to make but that is a piss poor effort on your behalf saying this is similar to what happened in her case.
Like Donkey said whilst we may all occasionally bag Hamley as a club (name a club which hasn't been bagged by someone on here) its only the dickheads like BobbyNeil (AKA The Big Shrek) that individually bag anyone. I would suggest to the bloke getting down on himself when reading this to either not come here for a read or harden up a touch as this site is all a bit of fun!
Lucky you're a better tipster than a comedian Bobby!![]()
by jumbo » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:22 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:
Highlight of the day would have to be when Tallan Leighton was running along the wing, took a couple of bounces towards the HFF when brother Khan in what looked like to be an attempted shepherd (not sure why cause nobody was within 10 metres of Tallan) cleaned him and himself up in front of our coaches box.![]()
by check side » Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:53 pm
UNDERthePACK wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:The reigning Ben.C wrote:BobbyNeil wrote:Could coach the Barossa wanna be's at Hamley.
Barossa wanna be's? Care to explain?
Hamley only ever seem to do alright when they kick the locals out and get ring ins in.
The latest bunch are wanna be's because although they are ring ins they are hopeless ones.
Hamley probably have gone alright when they have paid out good money for all the ring ins. Apart from the 3 willaston lads and 1 gawler central player the rest of the side are made up of local Hamley Bridge boys (or players that have been around the club for 4+ years). Unfortunately this year hasn't been great for the bombers but certainly gets a little confussing when we go alright we get criticised for spending the dollars and the last few years we have looked at devoloping the locals and not spending big money we are criticised for being s***t. Yep totally agree that the club should be more competative, no one is denying that fact but the club is a young group that have been given an opportunity at A-grade level and hopefully a good portion of the players such as the Luke Weddings, Stuey Gregory, Jed Eastwood and Angus Lemmans all become quality A-graders in years to come as all of them are under 20 plus probably another 6-7 in that age bracket. Get off Hamley's back unless you want to volunteer to come out and help out. It is extremely tough sitting behind a computer bagging the F**K out of players and clubs but have a little respect to everyone involved. I would like to see the football ability of half the bloggers on this sight. Would be very interesting to see their credentials compared to the comments they make. I don't get on here much but when I do its about football / APFL in general but certainly not about bagging anyone or any club. Yes its a forum but I know for a fact that a lot of people read this and get quite down on what is said. Seriously sometimes it gets a little personal and lets just remember what happened to the 16 year old geelong girl earlier in the week. Sometimes what issaid on this sort of forum isn't that much different
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |