Para District Cricket Association 2008/2009

[catchit]

i hope you are not relying to much on success for your rebuilding years browny.. I wouldnt imagine sib to play to many more years.. As for two wells being a rabble now.. It pretty much is back where they want to be.. Central districts was a power house.. Two wells should of been a power house.. West should of been a power house.. I am only talking since wells have been in..

[Lightning McQueen]

Well they were pretty strong dont you agree!

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

[unknown source]

Well they were pretty strong dont you agree!

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

when's the last time Sandy won it?? what do you class as a powehouse team?? priemership's or a good list?

[Lightning McQueen]

Well they were pretty strong dont you agree!

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

when's the last time Sandy won it?? what do you class as a powehouse team?? priemership's or a good list?

A strong list, strong performances throughout the season, didn't they win it the year before Two Wells, I could be wrong, nevertheless, they have been around the mark for a few years.

[Browny25]

A powerhouse to me is a good list! With good results of course..

Sandy / TW / and Wesites all had (still have) numerous talented players in their teams...

Brahma isnt a powerhouse because we have 1!

[catchit]

i say a powerhouse is a good list that wins premierships.. centrals can tick both boxes.. where as the others will be remembered for having strong lists with only 1 premiership in recent years.. who would want to be remembered for dominating the minor round??

[unknown source]

A powerhouse to me is a good list! With good results of course..

Sandy / TW / and Wesites all had (still have) numerous talented players in their teams...

Brahma isnt a powerhouse because we have 1!

since ive played senior level the only two i can think of is Salis West and Central District that i would class as a powerhouse side.. Westies have always finished the year top and have one two gf's since ive been playing and Central District won 3 in a row.. my opinion

[Browny25]

maybe a better argument would be that sandy / tw / westies should have won more flags with their lists..

[saveyourlegs]

A powerhouse to me is a good list! With good results of course..

Sandy / TW / and Wesites all had (still have) numerous talented players in their teams...

Brahma isnt a powerhouse because we have 1!

since ive played senior level the only two i can think of is Salis West and Central District that i would class as a powerhouse side.. Westies have always finished the year top and have one two gf's since ive been playing and Central District won 3 in a row.. my opinion

Spot on the money unknown source

[catchit]

no argument from me on that one browny..

[saveyourlegs]

Well they were pretty strong dont you agree!

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

Lm names on paper means nothing! Yes we were a good side but def not a "powerhouse" side.. I believe we were just as good as any of the other sides, i think everyone just about beat us last year except rose & crown.. The year before brahma lodge would of beat us in the semi final if it wasn't to hot on the sunday.. so it would be fair to say we weren't a "POWERHOUSE"

[Browny25]

very funny mate

[unknown source]

Well they were pretty strong dont you agree!

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

Lm names on paper means nothing! Yes we were a good side but def not a "powerhouse" side.. I believe we were just as good as any of the other sides, i think everyone just about beat us last year except rose & crown.. The year before brahma lodge would of beat us in the semi final if it wasn't to hot on the sunday.. so it would be fair to say we weren't a "POWERHOUSE"

happy you guys admit that but dont get me wrong you guys are quailty players and its always good to play against quailty teams.. i learnt alot last year..

like dont sledge the opening bowlers that can rip them down at you lol

[Lightning McQueen]

Well they were pretty strong dont you agree!

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

Lm names on paper means nothing! Yes we were a good side but def not a "powerhouse" side.. I believe we were just as good as any of the other sides, i think everyone just about beat us last year except rose & crown.. The year before brahma lodge would of beat us in the semi final if it wasn't to hot on the sunday.. so it would be fair to say we weren't a "POWERHOUSE"

You had high quality players for a few years, everyone was always wary when they came up against you guys.

[james07]

Well they were pretty strong dont you agree!

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

Lm names on paper means nothing! Yes we were a good side but def not a "powerhouse" side.. I believe we were just as good as any of the other sides, i think everyone just about beat us last year except rose & crown.. The year before brahma lodge would of beat us in the semi final if it wasn't to hot on the sunday.. so it would be fair to say we weren't a "POWERHOUSE"

so does that make TW SC and SW under achievers???

[Lightning McQueen]

just as good as the other 6 sides..

Come on mate, you guys have been the best side on paper for a few years, as for "powerhouses", there has only been 3 over the last few years, Westies, Two Wells and Sandy, before that is was Central District and Rose & Crown were right up there.

Lm names on paper means nothing! Yes we were a good side but def not a "powerhouse" side.. I believe we were just as good as any of the other sides, i think everyone just about beat us last year except rose & crown.. The year before brahma lodge would of beat us in the semi final if it wasn't to hot on the sunday.. so it would be fair to say we weren't a "POWERHOUSE"

so does that make TW SC and SW under achievers???

There's "usually" only one premiership team, at the start of each season there's a 12.5% chance of it being yours, how do you rate success, premierships, winning more than losing, building your club's financial status, every season there are 7 under-achievers if premierships are the be all and end all.

[unknown source]

dont know they are under achievers when they have all one the big one in the last 3 seasons.. we were saying powerhouses is a big word to give a team

[saveyourlegs]

so does that make TW SC and SW under achievers???

No james just sandy's..

[james07]

so does that make TW SC and SW under achievers???

No james just sandy's..

thanks

[catchit]

i am with james on this one.. and lm i am not sure that everyone is on equal odds at the start of a year, i would of thought TW 35% SW 30% SC 30% and the rest to share the other 5%... i also think success has to be mearsured by premierships, you would like to think that is the reason for playing the game IMO..