by turk186 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:06 pm
by aceman » Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:08 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:yes jabber, i came out and said well done at half time of the b grade as i was going into A grade meeting. on that particular day you were the fairest reserves umpire i have had the pleasure to watch. our guy is also good however he has no ties to hv being an ex safl umpire living nearby. on the guy you reported and got 15 weeks everyone knows he is his own worst enemy. reckon he has been reported every year he has played footy, terriffic lad but loses it when he crosses the white line sadly
by Rupert My Boy » Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:09 pm
by TIRED TIGER » Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:26 pm
by old moz » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:18 pm
by aceman » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:26 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:think you will find aceman when i was coaching reserves footy apart from 2 years it was all club umps including the great rule book against uni div1res .when safl umpires did have my sides they were learners in green tops with an experienced ump eg barry lewis. so yes i think he was one of the better ones. and aceman just for your info i try not too slag them altho at times it is very hard to bite the tongue i must admit. and the last time i crawled to anyone was you for you to buy me a beer.
by Jabber » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:33 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:35 am
Jabber wrote:Look guys, my appologies, it certainly wasn't meant to be a tyre pumping session. Anyway hopefully as of this saturday i'm back being a player, so i can hate all the orange maggots like you guys!
The original post was not meant to be a spiteful one, just that a guy got 15 weeks.
Also forgive me if i'm wrong but i don't think that he got life because i wasn't aware that the 15+ or 12+ rule or whatever it is was in force back then, unless they enforced it retrospectively and booted out the guys that had accrued the weeks previously.
Anyway, lets get on with it. As i said before, my appologies. I have got too many real life arguments going on at the moment to worry about any cyber ones.
by Jabber » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:47 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Jabber wrote:Look guys, my appologies, it certainly wasn't meant to be a tyre pumping session. Anyway hopefully as of this saturday i'm back being a player, so i can hate all the orange maggots like you guys!
The original post was not meant to be a spiteful one, just that a guy got 15 weeks.
Also forgive me if i'm wrong but i don't think that he got life because i wasn't aware that the 15+ or 12+ rule or whatever it is was in force back then, unless they enforced it retrospectively and booted out the guys that had accrued the weeks previously.
Anyway, lets get on with it. As i said before, my appologies. I have got too many real life arguments going on at the moment to worry about any cyber ones.
Are you umpiring this week?
by zedman » Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:10 am
Sturtman wrote:turk186 wrote:Jabber .... which are you more proud of ??
A. Getting a bloke banned for life because he stated what was obvious to most at that game... you were a pathetic one eyed blatant cheat![]()
or
B. The fact that after the game you came and stood near our barbie van and gloated (very loudly) over the fact to your two mates that 'you got another one this week and Im going to make sure he gets at least 8 matches'.![]()
or
C. Getting on this forum and pumping up your own tyres about it![]()
Good work champ.. a 'b' grade club umpire being a "would be if he could be"...hope you invested the money you got for attending the tribunal wisely.
Great call Turk. jabber you sound like a bloody Moron!!!
by Jabber » Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:12 am
zedman wrote:Sturtman wrote:turk186 wrote:Jabber .... which are you more proud of ??
A. Getting a bloke banned for life because he stated what was obvious to most at that game... you were a pathetic one eyed blatant cheat![]()
or
B. The fact that after the game you came and stood near our barbie van and gloated (very loudly) over the fact to your two mates that 'you got another one this week and Im going to make sure he gets at least 8 matches'.![]()
or
C. Getting on this forum and pumping up your own tyres about it![]()
Good work champ.. a 'b' grade club umpire being a "would be if he could be"...hope you invested the money you got for attending the tribunal wisely.
Great call Turk. jabber you sound like a bloody Moron!!!
i have been saying that for weeks..but now the emperor is naked..a B grade umpire..enough said
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:40 am
10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:53 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012
10 games plus finals.
North Pines guy goes up next week - if he bothers
by Q. » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:00 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012
10 games plus finals.
North Pines guy goes up next week - if he bothers
Try 28 games plus finals
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:08 am
Quichey wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012
10 games plus finals.
North Pines guy goes up next week - if he bothers
Try 28 games plus finals
Try 46 games plus finals
by Bigshow82 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012
10 games plus finals.
North Pines guy goes up next week - if he bothers
by Q. » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:26 am
Bigshow82 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012
10 games plus finals.
North Pines guy goes up next week - if he bothers
Where did you blokes find this info?? How did the Ovies bloke go??
Well thats why they changed it because he couldnt. Probably shouldnt have bothered changing it, not sure if it will matter if he is there or not after that case
by valleys07 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:41 am
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:45 am
Quichey wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012
10 games plus finals.
North Pines guy goes up next week - if he bothers
Try 28 games plus finals
Try 46 games plus finals
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:48 am
valleys07 wrote:The tribunal decision with the st pauls bloke is a bit confusing at the end of the day, how does he get a 2 1/2 year ban but is still eligible to play again, yet the paralowie player from last year is suspended for less than half the amount of games, but is banned for life??? am i missing something here, please correct me if im wrong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |