by NO-MERCY » Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:06 am
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:06 am
bayman wrote:i can't comment on it because i was at woodville oval.....i only call them as i see them....although i doubt claytons 'hit' could have put the player in a wheel chair where the other 'illegal tackle' could have
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by bayman » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:55 pm
matt1 wrote:bayman wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:bayman wrote:i can't comment on it because i was at woodville oval.....i only call them as i see them....although i doubt claytons 'hit' could have put the player in a wheel chair where the other 'illegal tackle' could have
2 games for an illegal tackle, with a clean record. 2 games for a striking behind play, with a scratchy record.
Surely you would outraged bayman.
as i said i didn't see it, infact i was at another match at least i comment on what i see
Its just that we'd all prefer if your view was through two eyes, not just one
by bayman » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:56 pm
Wedgie wrote:bayman wrote:i can't comment on it because i was at woodville oval.....i only call them as i see them....although i doubt claytons 'hit' could have put the player in a wheel chair where the other 'illegal tackle' could have
Noone denies anything you said in that comment, I personally took exception to the fact and only to the fact that you called it a spear tackle when it clearly wasn't.
Good to see Mal and your story have clearly changed now, it appears you may have been educated as to exactly what a spear tackle is so at least one good thing came out of your hissy fit!
And 'hit's have been known to kill people where not too many rough tackles have.
by nickname » Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:37 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:44 pm
nickname wrote:I agree bayman. So does wikipedia:
"A spear tackle is a dangerous tackle in rugby union, rugby league and Australian rules football whereby a player is picked up by a tackler on the opponent's side, and turned so that they are upside down. The tackler then drives the player into the ground head or neck first."
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:45 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:nickname wrote:I agree bayman. So does wikipedia:
"A spear tackle is a dangerous tackle in rugby union, rugby league and Australian rules football whereby a player is picked up by a tackler on the opponent's side, and turned so that they are upside down. The tackler then drives the player into the ground head or neck first."
Anyone who uses wikipedia for information is an idiot. Do some research.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:50 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:54 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:True. I have never seen someone post evidence that contradicts what they are trying to say before.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by nickname » Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:39 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:nickname wrote:I agree bayman. So does wikipedia:
"A spear tackle is a dangerous tackle in rugby union, rugby league and Australian rules football whereby a player is picked up by a tackler on the opponent's side, and turned so that they are upside down. The tackler then drives the player into the ground head or neck first."
Anyone who uses wikipedia for information is an idiot. Do some research.
by mal » Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:07 am
by Big Phil » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:03 pm
Jai Bednall @ Messenger Press wrote:Clayton’s bid to cool down
AGGRESSION: Clayton (left) has been found guilty of striking four times in the past three seasons
PORT Adelaide Magpies star Jeremy Clayton is attending anger management sessions in a bid to curb his onfield aggression.
The midfielder has been seeing a sports psychologist weekly since copping a four-match ban for striking Eagles wingman Luke Jarrad in Round 14 - the second time he had been rubbed out for striking this season.
He had previously seen the same psychologist last year to help him control outbursts of verbal abuse towards umpires, a trait some SANFL followers believe has cost him the chance of adding a second Magarey Medal to the one he won in 2005.
``I felt sick for a week after it happened ... I realised something needed to be done,’’ Clayton said of the Jarrad incident.
``I had previously met with her (the psychologist) to help me with the umpires thing and it’s absolutely worked with that so I’m confident it will help me with this too.
``We’ve put some things in place so that hopefully it doesn’t happen again - before I didn’t have any control over it at all.’’
Clayton, who was also suspended for two matches earlier in the season for striking West Adelaide’s Daniel Caire, will make his return for the Magpies against the Bloods at City Mazda Stadium this Saturday.
The 28 year old said he expected to be targeted by opposition players.
``Absolutely and that’s what we’re working through.
``I’m a pretty angry type on the footy field and it’s something (the bad behaviour) I’ve accepted is OK for the past 10 years but it’s not.’’
The four-time Magpies best and fairest stopped short of promising the incidents would never happen again.
``I’d like to be able to say it will never happen again. I can promise all things in the world but I’ve just got to go out and do it.
``I just want to get back, control the aggression and help the side win the last few games. It hasn’t been pretty (watching from the sidelines), especially the Sturt game. It’s been a long month.’’
Magpies football manager Bob Clayton said he was confident Clayton was dealing with the issue.
``He’s a quality player and he’s handling it all right,’’ Clayton said.
``He’ll be a better play for it.’’
by Booney » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:21 pm
by Macca19 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:13 pm
by silicone skyline » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:18 pm
mal wrote:NICKNAME
Dont worry about the inferior Wikipedia
In future use a far more superior source for SANFL football, Wedgiepedia
by Mate » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:49 am
by beenreal » Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:04 pm
by NO-MERCY » Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:41 pm
beenreal wrote:I'm starting to wonder whether the aggression has more to do with unfulfilled ambition. No doubt when he was recruited to the club in 2005, his head was filled with promises of an imminent Premiership under Jack or Tim Ginever.
As he has never won a Flag, at 28 he may be becoming frustrated at the chance slipping away.
by Slots It Through » Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:31 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:beenreal wrote:I'm starting to wonder whether the aggression has more to do with unfulfilled ambition. No doubt when he was recruited to the club in 2005, his head was filled with promises of an imminent Premiership under Jack or Tim Ginever.
As he has never won a Flag, at 28 he may be becoming frustrated at the chance slipping away.
Could well be the problem with the rest of the side too, to bigger expectations placed on them because of their past history.
by CoverKing » Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:24 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |