
by blueandwhite » Sat May 30, 2009 10:38 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 30, 2009 10:51 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Someone made a comment about Chambers earlier in this thread, and for all the ribbing us opposition supporters throw at him, he was clearly targetted by the men in white last night ... The first 25m penalty given against him at the Southern end was plain ridiculous, and was given by an umpire that clearly had Chambers in his sights (not that we minded at the time).
by JK » Sat May 30, 2009 10:57 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Someone made a comment about Chambers earlier in this thread, and for all the ribbing us opposition supporters throw at him, he was clearly targetted by the men in white last night ... The first 25m penalty given against him at the Southern end was plain ridiculous, and was given by an umpire that clearly had Chambers in his sights (not that we minded at the time).
That must depend on what part of the ground you are watching from. What I saw was Chambers holding onto Zorzi .. free kick. Then when it was paid, Chambers started gobbing off at the umpire ... 25 metres. That's the way it is.
Shortly afterwards, Zorzi outmarked Chambers from behind. Then as Zorzi was about to go back and take his kick, Chambers ran in and grabbed him. 25 meter penalty ... that's the rules of the game. Chambers went off his nut, as did most Sturt fans, but the ruling on both cases was 100% correct. Chambers was then dragged for lack of discipline. Once again, correct.
I'm not saying the umpiring was great, it wasn't, but to use the Chambers incidents as examples is pure folly.
by Sojourner » Sat May 30, 2009 11:26 am
bayman wrote:next coach
basset 1/2
james (r) 6/4
quote others
by Bluedemon » Sat May 30, 2009 11:37 am
by FlyingHigh » Sat May 30, 2009 11:59 am
purch wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Someone made a comment about Chambers earlier in this thread, and for all the ribbing us opposition supporters throw at him, he was clearly targetted by the men in white last night ... The first 25m penalty given against him at the Southern end was plain ridiculous, and was given by an umpire that clearly had Chambers in his sights (not that we minded at the time).
Nothing new there. Perhaps its time the SANFL considered mandatory pschycological testing for the umps, i.e. sit them down in fornt of a TV screen hooked up to heart and brain activity monitors then show them photos of various league players...
Backwell![]()
![]()
The Gowans![]()
Chambers![]()
by Bully » Sat May 30, 2009 12:01 pm
by fish » Sat May 30, 2009 12:08 pm
by am Bays » Sat May 30, 2009 12:24 pm
by dedja » Sat May 30, 2009 12:29 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 12:34 pm
by dedja » Sat May 30, 2009 12:39 pm
by JK » Sat May 30, 2009 12:41 pm
dedja wrote:My last comment on this as I don't know why I really care about Norwood anyway ...
Now paraphrasing comments from their own supporters, if Norwood are so bad, the coach is a dead man hanging in the breeze, the club has no money and the players aren't committed, then why don't we fold the club, just bulldoze the other side of Woods St, and return the competition to an even no. of teams with no bye and have a 21 game season where we play each other 3 times a year and have a final 4?
by Whitelinefever » Sat May 30, 2009 1:36 pm
by Sojourner » Sat May 30, 2009 1:49 pm
by Voice » Sat May 30, 2009 3:56 pm
Whitelinefever wrote:So Chambers got a rough trot from the umps,every time I see ud play him it seems the other way around,like in last years final he kicked the first three goals of the game from gimme free kicks including a penalty that put him dead in front.
Not that a guy of his calibre needs any help!
But thats the nature of the beast with a high profile full forward that gets plenty of attention......one day it will go his way,then for some reason unbeknown to anyone but the umpires they will pick in his favour.
Obviously the Sturt guys see plenty of him,and see a lot of what happens in to regards as to how the umps generally approach him.
You ask an oppositon supporter and they will say he gets a ride,you ask a Double Blues guy and he will tell you he gets a rough trot.
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 6:53 pm
dedja wrote:My last comment on this as I don't know why I really care about Norwood anyway ...
Now paraphrasing comments from their own supporters, if Norwood are so bad, the coach is a dead man hanging in the breeze, the club has no money and the players aren't committed, then why don't we fold the club, just bulldoze the other side of Woods St, and return the competition to an even no. of teams with no bye and have a 21 game season where we play each other 3 times a year and have a final 4?
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 6:54 pm
Sojourner wrote:Cheer up Norwood supporters, you will get to play South soon enough!
by dash61 » Sat May 30, 2009 6:58 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 7:10 pm
Voice wrote:Whitelinefever wrote:So Chambers got a rough trot from the umps,every time I see ud play him it seems the other way around,like in last years final he kicked the first three goals of the game from gimme free kicks including a penalty that put him dead in front.
Not that a guy of his calibre needs any help!
But thats the nature of the beast with a high profile full forward that gets plenty of attention......one day it will go his way,then for some reason unbeknown to anyone but the umpires they will pick in his favour.
Obviously the Sturt guys see plenty of him,and see a lot of what happens in to regards as to how the umps generally approach him.
You ask an oppositon supporter and they will say he gets a ride,you ask a Double Blues guy and he will tell you he gets a rough trot.
Funny that it's Constance Perm making the noise about Chambo getting a raw deal. Last time I checked, his profile says he's a Norwood supporter.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |