Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby blueandwhite » Sat May 30, 2009 10:38 am

cue "the hound". :roll:
Tiocfaidh ár Lá
User avatar
blueandwhite
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Cloney Harp
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 30, 2009 10:51 am

Constance_Perm wrote:Someone made a comment about Chambers earlier in this thread, and for all the ribbing us opposition supporters throw at him, he was clearly targetted by the men in white last night ... The first 25m penalty given against him at the Southern end was plain ridiculous, and was given by an umpire that clearly had Chambers in his sights (not that we minded at the time).


That must depend on what part of the ground you are watching from. What I saw was Chambers holding onto Zorzi .. free kick. Then when it was paid, Chambers started gobbing off at the umpire ... 25 metres. That's the way it is.

Shortly afterwards, Zorzi outmarked Chambers from behind. Then as Zorzi was about to go back and take his kick, Chambers ran in and grabbed him. 25 meter penalty ... that's the rules of the game. Chambers went off his nut, as did most Sturt fans, but the ruling on both cases was 100% correct. Chambers was then dragged for lack of discipline. Once again, correct.

I'm not saying the umpiring was great, it wasn't, but to use the Chambers incidents as examples is pure folly.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby JK » Sat May 30, 2009 10:57 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:Someone made a comment about Chambers earlier in this thread, and for all the ribbing us opposition supporters throw at him, he was clearly targetted by the men in white last night ... The first 25m penalty given against him at the Southern end was plain ridiculous, and was given by an umpire that clearly had Chambers in his sights (not that we minded at the time).


That must depend on what part of the ground you are watching from. What I saw was Chambers holding onto Zorzi .. free kick. Then when it was paid, Chambers started gobbing off at the umpire ... 25 metres. That's the way it is.

Shortly afterwards, Zorzi outmarked Chambers from behind. Then as Zorzi was about to go back and take his kick, Chambers ran in and grabbed him. 25 meter penalty ... that's the rules of the game. Chambers went off his nut, as did most Sturt fans, but the ruling on both cases was 100% correct. Chambers was then dragged for lack of discipline. Once again, correct.

I'm not saying the umpiring was great, it wasn't, but to use the Chambers incidents as examples is pure folly.


No problem with the second one which was clearly there, but the first one it appeared they pinged him for going over the mark, which I didn't think was the case ... Zorsi moved off his line to take his kick and Chambers almost dived in an attempt to smother and the second he moved, Quickdraw McGraw got him ... Had a pretty good view of it and looked as though the ump was itching to write him out a ticket.

Anyone know what Duigan got booked for?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Sojourner » Sat May 30, 2009 11:26 am

bayman wrote:next coach

basset 1/2

james (r) 6/4

quote others


Strong rumour that Phil Carman is in the mix and highly regarded as an ex Norwood man.
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Bluedemon » Sat May 30, 2009 11:37 am

i have to agree with other, the standard of umpiring was very poor. tony dey is meant to be the number 1 umpire and some of his decisions were bad and that went for both teams. norwood never looked like they were trying to win, game was too scrappy and at times was boring. sturt just did what they had to do, get the 2 points and now look to the centrals game to see where they stand for this year.
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
User avatar
Bluedemon
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Goodwood
Has liked: 127 times
Been liked: 106 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby FlyingHigh » Sat May 30, 2009 11:59 am

purch wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:Someone made a comment about Chambers earlier in this thread, and for all the ribbing us opposition supporters throw at him, he was clearly targetted by the men in white last night ... The first 25m penalty given against him at the Southern end was plain ridiculous, and was given by an umpire that clearly had Chambers in his sights (not that we minded at the time).


Nothing new there. Perhaps its time the SANFL considered mandatory pschycological testing for the umps, i.e. sit them down in fornt of a TV screen hooked up to heart and brain activity monitors then show them photos of various league players...

Backwell :heart: :-bd
The Gowans :? :x
Chambers :evil: :twisted:


They have tried this, but the thing overloaded when they showed a picture a Paul Lindsay. Must have had some effect because he did get a free kick the next week.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Bully » Sat May 30, 2009 12:01 pm

another week and another loss to the legs.
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby fish » Sat May 30, 2009 12:08 pm

Can someone remind me to never, ever, under any circumstances, ever tip Norwood to win again. :evil:
User avatar
fish
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:28 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby am Bays » Sat May 30, 2009 12:24 pm

I was going to make this comment after watching Norwood v west but thought, "nup not my place to make comment on another clubs coach". After the Glenelg game I thought, "nup, just rubbing Norwood fans noses in it - keep your thought to yourself" but after last night (and read Norwood supporters comments on here and Redleg talk) if ever a coach has "lost" his players it is Trevor Hill.

Now you can argue ad neuseum the reasons why and should the tail wag the dog but seriously what can be gained by keeping him on??

People have bagged my club for sacking coaches and the turmoil it creates but surely keeping a lame duck coach is just as harmful. Maybe just maybe there was a method in our madness - hmmm I doubt it though....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19625
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2090 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby dedja » Sat May 30, 2009 12:29 pm

that may all be true am bays, but then there was the central game where they were a tad unlucky to lose ... not sure what has happened as they have been abyssmal since then.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23375
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 670 times
Been liked: 1553 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 12:34 pm

Image

we stink!
we stink!
we stink!

:(

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28497
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby dedja » Sat May 30, 2009 12:39 pm

My last comment on this as I don't know why I really care about Norwood anyway ...

Now paraphrasing comments from their own supporters, if Norwood are so bad, the coach is a dead man hanging in the breeze, the club has no money and the players aren't committed, then why don't we fold the club, just bulldoze the other side of Woods St, and return the competition to an even no. of teams with no bye and have a 21 game season where we play each other 3 times a year and have a final 4?
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 23375
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 670 times
Been liked: 1553 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby JK » Sat May 30, 2009 12:41 pm

dedja wrote:My last comment on this as I don't know why I really care about Norwood anyway ...

Now paraphrasing comments from their own supporters, if Norwood are so bad, the coach is a dead man hanging in the breeze, the club has no money and the players aren't committed, then why don't we fold the club, just bulldoze the other side of Woods St, and return the competition to an even no. of teams with no bye and have a 21 game season where we play each other 3 times a year and have a final 4?


You really wanna cost yourself 2-3 guaranteed wins a year??
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Whitelinefever » Sat May 30, 2009 1:36 pm

So Chambers got a rough trot from the umps,every time I see ud play him it seems the other way around,like in last years final he kicked the first three goals of the game from gimme free kicks including a penalty that put him dead in front.
Not that a guy of his calibre needs any help!
But thats the nature of the beast with a high profile full forward that gets plenty of attention......one day it will go his way,then for some reason unbeknown to anyone but the umpires they will pick in his favour.
Obviously the Sturt guys see plenty of him,and see a lot of what happens in to regards as to how the umps generally approach him.
You ask an oppositon supporter and they will say he gets a ride,you ask a Double Blues guy and he will tell you he gets a rough trot.
User avatar
Whitelinefever
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Sojourner » Sat May 30, 2009 1:49 pm

Cheer up Norwood supporters, you will get to play South soon enough! ;)
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Voice » Sat May 30, 2009 3:56 pm

Whitelinefever wrote:So Chambers got a rough trot from the umps,every time I see ud play him it seems the other way around,like in last years final he kicked the first three goals of the game from gimme free kicks including a penalty that put him dead in front.
Not that a guy of his calibre needs any help!
But thats the nature of the beast with a high profile full forward that gets plenty of attention......one day it will go his way,then for some reason unbeknown to anyone but the umpires they will pick in his favour.
Obviously the Sturt guys see plenty of him,and see a lot of what happens in to regards as to how the umps generally approach him.
You ask an oppositon supporter and they will say he gets a ride,you ask a Double Blues guy and he will tell you he gets a rough trot.

Funny that it's Constance Perm making the noise about Chambo getting a raw deal. Last time I checked, his profile says he's a Norwood supporter.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 6:53 pm

dedja wrote:My last comment on this as I don't know why I really care about Norwood anyway ...

Now paraphrasing comments from their own supporters, if Norwood are so bad, the coach is a dead man hanging in the breeze, the club has no money and the players aren't committed, then why don't we fold the club, just bulldoze the other side of Woods St, and return the competition to an even no. of teams with no bye and have a 21 game season where we play each other 3 times a year and have a final 4?


Perhaps you are fortunate that geniearses such as yourself didn't say the same 5hit after the magnifcent start to the Yabs SANFL career....56 straight losses! Despite our well documented problems We've won 8 flags to 3 since WWII and our last flag was 11 years more recent than yours. We've been ordinary for a decade, you've been ordinary for the majority of your existence...perhaps it is you girls who should **** off. :D

regards,

REB
Last edited by Rik E Boy on Sat May 30, 2009 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28497
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 6:54 pm

Sojourner wrote:Cheer up Norwood supporters, you will get to play South soon enough! ;)


Problem is, you are the blokes who might be looking forward to it! 2004 all over again!

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28497
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby dash61 » Sat May 30, 2009 6:58 pm

For all the people who want to kick Norwood at the moment, lets not take the spotlight way from Luke Norman

For a side most including myself thought would struggle with the players they lost "Luke Norman" has done a fantastic job so far as a first year coach
dash61
 

Re: Rd 9 Norwood v Sturt Post Game Reviews

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat May 30, 2009 7:10 pm

Voice wrote:
Whitelinefever wrote:So Chambers got a rough trot from the umps,every time I see ud play him it seems the other way around,like in last years final he kicked the first three goals of the game from gimme free kicks including a penalty that put him dead in front.
Not that a guy of his calibre needs any help!
But thats the nature of the beast with a high profile full forward that gets plenty of attention......one day it will go his way,then for some reason unbeknown to anyone but the umpires they will pick in his favour.
Obviously the Sturt guys see plenty of him,and see a lot of what happens in to regards as to how the umps generally approach him.
You ask an oppositon supporter and they will say he gets a ride,you ask a Double Blues guy and he will tell you he gets a rough trot.

Funny that it's Constance Perm making the noise about Chambo getting a raw deal. Last time I checked, his profile says he's a Norwood supporter.


Shut up Voice. **** sake!

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28497
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1764 times
Been liked: 1876 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |