bayman wrote:well i will ask it seeing no one else has.....do the norwood players care enough ? example mcglones goal in the 2nd term....for those not there he took a mark & there was NO EFFORT from the closest norwood player, then mcglone looked & to his amazement the same player hadn't even bothered to stand the mark so mcglone just strolled into an open goal.
Bayman, I recall that incident and wasn't impressed. Nor was I impressed by another goal Sturt kicked in that quarter from the right forward pocket when another high priced player didn't chase anywhere near hard enough and it resulted in a goal. I've been very disappointed in the efforts of both those players all season.
One only appears to be interested when he's a chance of winning the ball, and God only knows what's going through the head of the other one.
I think most of the players "care", I just feel Trevor Hill lost the players some time ago, resulting in players not wanting to play for him, and this always gives the impression that they don't care.
I would seriously like to see our current list under the care of someone like Healy, Norman, Macgowan, etc .... I think you'd see the players "caring" a lot more than they do at present.
Norwood are playing a very dull, uneventful style of football, and it would be natural for players to become unhappy. I know I would be.
What worries me is the longer we retain Hill, the greater chance we have of a few players looking elsewhere to play next season, and with our limited recruiting capacity for 2010, we'll be right back where we were in 2004.